⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Johnson v. Biopure Corporation”

Johnson v. Glassmanpublic domain
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008-03-05 · Published · cited 18× · 950 A.2d 215; 401 N.J. Super. 222
950 A.2d 215 (2008) 401 N.J. Super. 222 Carl JOHNSON and Jerry Foster, Derivatively On Behalf of Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel GLASSMAN, Iris Glassman, Bradley Glassman, R. Brent Lenczycki, C. Ralph Daniel, III, Steven Kriegsman, Alan Wolin, Andre Fedida, Michael Fedida and Michael Bernstein, Defendants-Respondents, and Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Nominal Def
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-09-02 · Published · cited 65× · 765 F.3d 1137; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17078; 2014 WL 4290625
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Allergan, a specialty pharmaceutical manufacturer, produces Botox, a well-known cosmetic and therapeutic drug. In 2010, faced with allegations that it had acted illegally in marketing and labeling Botox, Allergan settled several qui tom suits and pled guilty in a criminal ease. Allergan ultimately paid a total of $600 million in part for civil settlements and
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004-12-03 · Published · cited 1× · 225 F.R.D. 186; 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 400; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25368; 2004 WL 2914903
ORDER VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs remaining claim in this case is that Defendant Friedrichs, formerly a teacher and/or principal in the Fayette County Schools, was known by the Board and “Supervising Defendants” to be a pedophile and they, “in spite of such knowledge, failed to take any precautions or actions to prevent Friedrichs from inflicting harm upon young, male
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-07-13 · Published · cited 31× · 722 F. Supp. 2d 453; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69593; 2010 WL 2747447
722 F.Supp.2d 453 (2010) In re: PFIZER INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Master File No.: 09 Civ. 7822 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 13, 2010. *454 Ira M. Press, David E. Kovel, Edward Michael Varga, Kirby McInerney LLP, Gerald Harlan Silk, Jeroen Van Kwawegen, Mark Lebovitch, Noam Noah Mandel, Beata Gocy