Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Johnson v. Biopure Corporation”
Johnson v. Glassmanpublic domain
950 A.2d 215 (2008) 401 N.J. Super. 222 Carl JOHNSON and Jerry Foster, Derivatively On Behalf of Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel GLASSMAN, Iris Glassman, Bradley Glassman, R. Brent Lenczycki, C. Ralph Daniel, III, Steven Kriegsman, Alan Wolin, Andre Fedida, Michael Fedida and Michael Bernstein, Defendants-Respondents, and Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Nominal Def
Willa Rosenbloom v. David Pyottpublic domain
OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Allergan, a specialty pharmaceutical manufacturer, produces Botox, a well-known cosmetic and therapeutic drug. In 2010, faced with allegations that it had acted illegally in marketing and labeling Botox, Allergan settled several qui tom suits and pled guilty in a criminal ease. Allergan ultimately paid a total of $600 million in part for civil settlements and
Bell v. Board of Educationpublic domain
ORDER VANDERVORT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiffs remaining claim in this case is that Defendant Friedrichs, formerly a teacher and/or principal in the Fayette County Schools, was known by the Board and “Supervising Defendants” to be a pedophile and they, “in spite of such knowledge, failed to take any precautions or actions to prevent Friedrichs from inflicting harm upon young, male
In Re Pfizer Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigationpublic domain
722 F.Supp.2d 453 (2010) In re: PFIZER INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. Master File No.: 09 Civ. 7822 (JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 13, 2010. *454 Ira M. Press, David E. Kovel, Edward Michael Varga, Kirby McInerney LLP, Gerald Harlan Silk, Jeroen Van Kwawegen, Mark Lebovitch, Noam Noah Mandel, Beata Gocy