Cases

Affirmed.

353 S.W.3d 662 (2011) Johnny WIGGINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 94658. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. August 16, 2011. Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., a

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 11-1-08534-8, Laura Gene Middaugh, J., entered July 19, 2013. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Spearman, C.J., concurred in by Cox and Dwyer, JJ.

808 P.2d 1383 (1991) 248 Kan. 526 STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Johnny WIGGINS, Appellant. No. 64716. Supreme Court of Kansas. April 12, 1991. *1384 Michael L. McCoy, Asst. Appellate Defender, argued the cause, and Jessica R. Kunen, Chief Appellate Defender, was with him on the brief for appellant.

CASANUEVA, Judge. David Wiggins appeals his sentences in thirteen cases following the revocation of community control in each one. We affirm on all issues except the award of his credit for time served. Pursuant to section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1995), Wiggins is entitled to credit for all of the time he spent in the county jail prior to his sentencing. See also State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d

208 Ga. App. 757 (1993) 432 S.E.2d 113 WIGGINS v. THE STATE. A93A0759. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 26, 1993. Moore & Davidson, Johnny R. Moore, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Brenda J. Bernstein, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BLACKBURN, Judge. The defendant,

BARKETT, Circuit Judge: This case is the latest in a long line of appeals stemming from a 1985 employment discrimination lawsuit brought by a class of African-American employees and applicants against the Alabama Department of Transportation (“ALDOT”). In January 1994, a group of white ALDOT employees moved to intervene for purposes of challenging the race-conscious aspects of a

07/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 9, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEDRICK WIGGINS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 14-01751 Chris Craft, Judge ___________________________________

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Judge. On this appeal from appellant’s conviction on two counts of uttering a forged instrument, appellant claims he should be discharged because he was not brought to trial within the period prescribed by the speedy trial rule, Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We agree. The State’s contention is that the period of the rule did not begin to run until August 25, 1978, when appellant was formally arrested on the char

WIGGINS, Justice (concurring specially)- I write to concur specially. I agree with the well-reasoned dissent. If we were to develop the common law further in this area, I might overrule our prior precedents for the reasons stated in the dissent and allow the court to award punitive damages awarded against the estate of a deceased tortfeasor. However, when the legislature jumped into the arena of punitive dam

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Johnny C. Wiggins appeals from a final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Wiggins v. Lockart, No. PB-C-86-155 (E.D.Ark. July 10, 1986). For reversal, Wiggins a

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00612-CR JOHNNY MARTINEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 208th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Cour

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE JOHNNY M. THOMAS, ) No. ED111245 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Charles County

HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge. Johnny Clint Wiggins and other inmates from the Cummins Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their civil rights action. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The inmates contend that prison officials have refused to allow them to receive religious literature and to correspond with religious leaders in violation of their first amendment rights. They also allege

JOHNSON, Judge. Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s ruling on defendants’ motions for directed verdicts. The dispositive issue presented to us is whether as a matter of law the evidence offered by plaintiffs, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, is sufficient to be submitted to the jury. See Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Memorial Park, 281 N.C. 48, 187 S.E. 2d 721 (1972).

ACCEPTED 15-25-00005-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2025 2:57 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00005-CV CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge. Plaintiff, an inmate in the Oklahoma State Penitentiary has brought this action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S. C. § 1983 against Defendant Park J. Anderson, then Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, and Defendants B. R. Parrach and O. D. Martin, Guards at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary, complaining that under color of State law said Defendants deprived P

ORDER The judgment of this court has been reversed, unpublished Memorandum decision filed May 31, 1995, 1 and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Old Chief v. United States, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 644, 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997). The district

326 S.E.2d 39 (1985) Carl M. WIGGINS and Clara P. Wiggins v. The CITY OF MONROE, a Municipal Corporation and Johnnie H. Rollins, Jr. No. 8420SC138. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 19, 1985. *41 Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston by Christian R. Troy, Charlotte, for plaintiffs-appellants.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 26, 2014 JOHNNY COFFEY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 12-CR-503 Carroll L. Ross, Judge No. E2013-01659-CCA-R3-PC - Filed April 23, 2014 The Petitioner, Johnny Coffey, appeals the Bradley County Criminal Court’s denial of post