Cases

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Johnny White, an African-American, was tried by jury and found guilty on charges of possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994); carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (1994); and illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in

___________ No. 95-2949 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Johnny White,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 96-KP-00246-SCT JOHNNY WHITE a/k/a JOHNNY LEE WHITE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED, PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/31/96 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. KOSTA N. VLAHOS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTOR

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Johnny White was convicted of armed robbery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a), 2113(d), and possession of a firearm in connection with that robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). He challenges his conviction, claiming an improper jury instruction, a speedy trial violation, and an erroneous evidentiary ruling; in addition he challenges his sentence. We affirm.

Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 287205; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 KW 0129 11 Denied. Moot.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 05-2040 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNNY R. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00230-CR In re Johnny Wayne White, II FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 47,692, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION In February 1998, Johnny Wayne White, II was sentenced to twenty years in prison following his conviction for

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-06-00230-CR In re Johnny Wayne White, II FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF

PER CURIAM. This appeal stems from a slip and fall accident that occurred in front of a Dunkin Donuts operated by defendant PSL Donuts, LLC. The plaintiffs, Cathy and Johnny Suker, appeal the final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant. 1 The trial court granted summary judgment based on Section 768.0755,

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 04-1-04526-8, Frederick W. Fleming, J., entered November 30, 2004. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J., concurred in by Houghton and Armstrong, JJ.

In re White, Johnny; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 00-6553; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-991. This application is transferred to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal for consideration pursuant to the procedures outlined in that court’s en banc resolution of September 9, 2008. See State v. Cordero, 08-1717 (La.10-3-0

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.) rendered January 27, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal mischief in the third degree and petit larceny, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed. The testimony of the victim regarding the actual cost of repairing the damaged property was sufficient to establish that the dama

OPINION GWIN, District Judge. Defendant Johnny White appeals his conviction for importing forty-five high-capacity firearm magazines into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545 and § 542. With his appeal, White challenges (1) whether the district court erred in excluding, as hearsay, evidence offered by a defense witness; (2) whether the district court erred in finding the evidence sufficient t

In re White, Johnny; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial *131District Court Div. D, No. 00-6553; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-991. Denied.

Cheno Kentaruas White was arrested and charged with unlawful possession of marijuana in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-12-214, Ala. Code 1975. White filed a pre-trial motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of an investigatory stop, namely a green leafy substance later determined to be marijuana and alleged statements or admissions made by White in connection with the illegal search of White's vehicle. Following an evidentiary heari

In re White, Florita; White, Johnny et al.; — Plaintiff(s); Applying For Superviso*851ry and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Rap-ides, 9th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 221,256; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW 09-01048. Denied.

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered November 13, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (3 counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury had am

PER CURIAM. We affirm White’s conviction and sentence, without prejudice to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the only issue on appeal, by seeking relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. We recognize, and the state has not disputed, that White asserts a prima facie showing that the speedy trial time period had expired at the time the state filed the information

In re White, Johnny;—Defendant; Applying for Writ, of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 287,205; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2001-KA-0023. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ.