Cases

ORDER The opinion filed January 13, 1994 is withdrawn and the opinion and separate concurrence filed concurrently herewith are filed in its stead. OPINION DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: We consider the following question in this appeal: To what extent is a district court obliged to consider the policy statements of Chapter 7 of the United States Sentencing Guidelin

14 F.3d 34w UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John William FORRESTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10137. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 16, 1993*.Decided Jan. 13, 1994. NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Donohue, J. This action arises out of a public construction contract entered into between the plaintiff, John J. Petruzzi-William E. Forrester, Inc. (“Petruzzi-Forrester”), and the defendant, the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority (“MTA”), for rock and earth excavation and the stabilization and construction of boulder walls and ditches. Petruzzi-Forrester claims that it is entitled to (1) additional compensation for time lost as a

WILLIAM R. FORRESTER, JR. * NO. 2023-CA-0335 AND REGAN A. FORRESTER * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * JOSHUA L. BRUNO FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH:

SCHWELB, Associate Judge, dissenting: Forrester had a statutory right to a hearing on his motion to set aside his convictions “[ujnless the motion and files and records of the case conclusively show that [he was] entitled to no relief.” D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996). In my opinion, no such conclusive showing has been made, and the trial judge erred in denying Forrester’s motion without a hearing.

04/22/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 3, 2021 Session LINDSEY BETH HONEA V. JOHN WILLIAM HONEA Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 17CV-833 Darrell Scarlett, Chancellor No. M2020-00881-COA-R3-CV A mother

James G. Carr, Sr. U.S. District Judge This is a copyright-infringement case in which the plaintiff, Design Basics, LLC (DB), alleges that the defendants - Forrester Wehrle Homes, Inc.; Forrester Wehrle Development, Ltd.; and their principals Jeffrey, Joseph, and Richard Wehrle (collectively, FWH) - infringed DB's copyrights in a series of architectural plans. DB alleges that FWH copied its plans and/or used them wi

Defendant appeals his jury convictions on the charges of aggravated first-degree murder and first-degree extortion. He raises the following issues: (1) Were the tape recordings of the defendant's telephone conversations with a police officer made in violation of RCW 9.73.030? (2) Was the defendant's confession to a police detective voluntary? (3) Was the admission into evidence of a typed manuscript of the defendant's tape-recorded confession

TITUS, Judge. The transcribed judgment of conviction herein recounts that on August 24, 1978, in the Circuit Court of Greene County, Missouri, defendant was sentenced and judgment was entered upon his conviction for the crime of pandering, a felony per § 563.010, V.A.M.S. The court has been furnished a certified copy of the Certificate of Death of the Missouri Division of Health, duly executed by Harold L. Jones, M.D., which

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM F. FORREST, a single No. 22-16051 man; WENDY SMITH, a single woman; MICHELLE MARTINEZ, a D.C. No. single woman; JODI MILLER, a 2:21-cv-01688- married woman; KENNETH GMS TURNER, a married man, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER KEITH SPIZZIRRI; MIRIAM SPIZZIRRI, husband and wife; KEN MAR

James G. Carr, , Sr. U.S. District Judge *937This is a copyright-infringement case. Plaintiff Design Basics, LLC (DB), creates, markets, and licenses architectural plans for single-family homes. (Doc. 58 at ¶ 1). It contends that defendants-Forrester Wehrle Homes, Inc.; Wehrle Development, Ltd.; and their principals Jeffrey, Richard, and Joseph

(2008) Ray FORRESTER, Plaintiff, v. RAULAND-BORG CORP., Defendant. No. 04 C 4424. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 16, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER CHARLES R. NORGLE, Senior District Judge. Fair warning: This Opinion contains x-rated emails that the Plaintiff sent to a female coworker at Defendant's company.

906 P.2d 304 (1995) 138 Or. App. 43 Jane ST. JOHN and James Heiden, Plaintiffs, and Pat HERRICK and Friends of the Historic 804 County Road and Hiking Trail, aka 804 Revisited Committee as an entity unto itself and as its individual members in their own right, Portia Foster, William Adams, Norma McMillin, Janice Brandstrom, Charlotte Mills, Joan Criswell, Rita Boudreau and Barbara Foster, Appellants, v. YACHATS PLA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00947-COA WILLIAM EUGENE HOWARD, JR., TRUSTEE APPELLANT OF THE WILLIAM EUGENE HOWARD, JR. TRUST v. KELLIE NELSON, ADMINISTRATOR WITH APPELLEE WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN CARPENTER NELSON, JR., DECEASED DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/17/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON

PER CURIAM: John W. Darden, John L. Dillon and James T. Holmes, members of the United Steelworkers of America (the “Union”), filed separate complaints in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama on November 26, 1986 seeking damages for breach of contract, false representations, conspiracy and conversion. The three cases were removed to the United States District Court fo

This is a constitutional challenge to the Alabama tax on insurance premiums brought as a result of the recent ruling of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Western andSouthern Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Equalization,451 U.S. 648, 101 S.Ct. 2070, 68 L.Ed.2d 514 (1981). Section 27-4-4, Code of Alabama 19

01/31/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 17, 2023 Session MATTHEW SWILLEY ET AL. v. WILLIAM THOMAS ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 21-0437 Pamela A. Fleenor, Chancellor ________________________________

04/22/2026 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 31, 2026 SAMUEL FORRESTER HUNTER v. WINNIE SUE COOPER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 19CV-48536 Deana C. Hood, Judge ___________________________________

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM F. FORREST; WENDY No. 22-16051 SMITH; MICHELLE MARTINEZ; JODI MILLER; KENNETH D.C. No. TURNER, 2:21-cv-01688- Plaintiffs-Appellants, GMS v. OPINION KEITH SPIZZIRRI; MIRIAM SPIZZIRRI; KEN MARING; MARING; CYNTHIA MOORE; MOORE, Unknown; named as John Doe

06/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 18-04642 John W. Campbell, Judge No. W2019-00914-CCA-R3-CD The defendant