Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Warren Williams”
Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. John Warrenpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1005 VIRGINIA URANIUM, INC.; COLES HILL, LLC; BOWEN MINERALS, LLC; VIRGINIA ENERGY RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. JOHN WARREN, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy; BRA
Warren v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: William J. Warren, Laurie Rubin, and David Young-Wolff bring separate actions against John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Wiley”) for copyright infringement and related claims. Rubin’s action is also against William Zerter and Hilary Newman (employees of Wiley), and John Does 1-10 (“the Printer Defendants”). Defendants now move to dismiss these action
United States v. Warrenpublic domain
ORDER James Warren was a frequent customer of Fearless Distributing, a store in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, that not only sold clothing and other merchandise but also held itself out as a willing buyer of guns and drugs. Over the course of three months, either in person or through friends, Warren sold store employees several firearms and a number of pills containing controlled substances including ecstasy. Unfortunately for Warren, Fearless
Warren v. Patakipublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In 2005, then-New York State Governor George Pataki launched the Sexually Violent Predator Initiative (the “SVP Initiative” or the “Initiative”), which provided for the involuntary civil commitment at state psychiatric facilities of some “sexually violent predators” (“SVPs”) nearing the date of their release from incarceration or supervision. The six plaintiffs in this case were civilly committed to a ps
Thomas Wilson v. Warren County, Illinoispublic domain
ADELMAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Thomas Wilson and Randy Brown bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against private citizen defendants, Ronald Hanson, Mark Johnson, and Douglas Reiners, as well as against Warren County, Illinois and several of its officials including Sheriff Martin Edwards, Deputy Thomas Carithers, and State Attorney Albert Algren, referred to as the public de
Williams v. Warren General Hospitalpublic domain
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County granting the defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs' claims of negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the lower court. On July 9, 1992, plaintiff-appellant Frances Williams admitted herself to defendant-appellee Warren General Hospital to have an ovarian tumor removed. The excised tissue was sent to the Path
State of Tennessee v. Warren Parkerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 3, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WARREN PARKER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 06-08080 John T. Fowlkes, Jr., Judge No. W2009-02578-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 7, 2010 The defendant, Warren Parker, appeals the trial court’s denial of any form of alterna
Warren v. Bakerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Lester M. Warren appeals the dismissal of his federal civil rights complaint against thirty-three defendants. This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arose from the dismissal of Warren’s state-court medical malpractice and wrongful death suit against eighteen of the present defendants. In his federal complaint, Warren alleges several conspiracies that arose in th
Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vardiman (Slip Opinion)public domain
Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Edwin Lowe Vardiman Jr. of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0070574, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999. 1 *24 On December 3, 2007, we suspended Vardiman for failing to register for the 2
Warren v. Bakerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. Lester M. Warren appeals the dismissal of his federal civil rights complaint against thirty-three defendants. This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arose from the dismissal of Warren’s state-court medical malpractice and wrongful death suit against eighteen of the present defendants. In his federal complaint, Warren alleges several conspiracies that arose in th
Cora Mitchell v. City of Warren, MIpublic domain
SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which NORRIS, J., joined, and DONALD, J., joined in part. DONALD, J. (pp 236-44), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. After Robert Mitchell resisted arrest by the police, an officer shot two taser darts into his chest. Robert experienced cardiac arrest and died shortly af
Comcast Corp. v. Warrenpublic domain
650 S.E.2d 307 (2007) COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. v. WARREN. No. A07A0505. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 6, 2007. Reconsideration Denied July 27, 2007. *309 Carter & Ansley, Tommy T. Holland, John L. McKinley, Jr., Atlanta, John D. Hadden, for appellants Greer, Klosik, Daugherty & Swank, John F
Warren v. Statepublic domain
126 S.W.3d 336 (2004) James WARREN, Jr., Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 05-02-01982-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. February 4, 2004. *337 John H. Hagler, Dallas, for appellant. William T. (Bill) Hill, Jr., District Attorney, Appellate Section, Tammy Ardolf, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas, for s
Warren Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, epublic domain
PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: ExxonMobil Oil Corporation removed the underlying suits as a “mass action” pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005.1 The consolidated interlocutory appeals of Warren Lester, et al. and Shirley Bottley, et al. (Plaintiffs) challenge the district court’s order denying their respective motions to remand. We affirm.
Elliott v. Town of Warrenpublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on December 10, 2002, pursuant to an order directing all parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and considering the memoranda of the parties, we conclude that cause has not been shown. Accordingly, we shall decide the appeal at
639 F.Supp.2d 371 (2009) WARREN PEARL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant. No. 08 Civ. 9445(WHP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 22, 2009. *373 John Walter Fried, Esq., Fried and Epstein, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs. Paul Kenneth Stecker,
Butler v. Charles Powers Estate ex rel. Warrenpublic domain
OPINION Justice BAER. We granted allowance of appeal to consider whether a deed executed in 1881, which reserved to the grantor the subsurface and removal rights of “one-half [of] the minerals and Petroleum Oils” contained beneath the subject property, includes within the reservation any natural gas contained within the shale formation beneath the subject land known as the Marcellus Shale Forma
Gilstrap v. June Eisele Warren Trustpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 860 [¶ 1] After their mother died in 1938, each of three siblings, Ray E. Gilstrap (Ray), William P. Gilstrap (William) and Daisy Pearl Williams (Daisy), received an undivided one-third interest in a 680-acre ranch with a 320-acre mineral estate pursuant to her will. However, the siblings agreed to an alternativ
State v. Kelvin Williams (071306)public domain
*579 Justice ALBIN delivered the opinion of the Court. A jury convicted defendant, Kelvin Williams, of first-degree robbery based on evidence that he entered a bank, told a teller he possessed a bomb, and demanded money. Defendant made no gesture as he issued his threat, and a bomb was not displayed. Defe
Williams v. Williams, Ca2006-09-103 (6-18-2007)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, A. Graves Williams, III ("husband"), appeals from the Judgment Entry and Decree of Divorce of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, imputing income for child support and distributing marital assets and debts. {¶ 2} Husband and appellee, Lisa A. Williams ("wife") were married August 25, *Pa