Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 10-2922 JOHN D OE, 3, a minor by D OE 3’S next best friend D OE 2, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E LMBROOK S CHOOL D ISTRICT, Elmbrook Joint Common School District No. 21, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court

OPINION HANSON, Justice. Appellant John Joseph Bussmann was convicted of two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct by a member of the clergy, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. l(Z)(ii) (2006) (hereafter the “clergy sexual conduct statute”). The clergy sexual conduct statute makes it a crime for a member of the clergy to engage in sexual penetration with a person who is seeking or receiv

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE ; No. 04-55732 MAXWELL BREEN ; LORI BARNES- WALLACE ; LYNN BARNES- D.C. No. WALLACE ; MICHAEL BREEN ; CV-00-01726- VALERIE BREEN , NAJ/AJB Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO , Defendant, and BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESE

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: Under the Supreme Court’s precedents, plaintiffs have standing to raise an Establishment Clause challenge to the Inaugural prayers and to the inclusion of the words “so help me God” in the official Presidential oath administered at the public Inauguration ceremonies. I would reject plaintiffs’ claims on the merits because those longstanding practices do

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

658 F.3d 710 (2011) John DOE, 3, a minor by Doe 3's next best friend DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ELMBROOK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Elmbrook Joint Common School District No. 21, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-2922. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 9, 2011. Decided September 9, 2011. *712<

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

603 F.3d 1002 (2010) Michael Arthur NEWDOW, et al., Appellants v. John G. ROBERTS, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, et al., Appellees. No. 09-5126. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued December 15, 2009. Decided May 7, 2010. *1004 Michael Newdow argued the cause for ap

PER CURIAM: The City of Pensacola, Florida appeals a district court decision ordering it to remove a 34-foot Latin cross from a public park on the ground that the City's maintenance of the cross violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. Having concluded that we are bound by existing Circuit precedent, we find ourselves constrained to affirm.

903 P.2d 110 (1995) 127 Idaho 521 Michael L. BEALE and Christine K. Beale, husband and wife, and Christine K. Beale, as parent and Guardian Ad Litem for Joshua C. Beale, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael SPECK and Gloria S. Speck, husband and wife, and Gregory L. Speck, Defendants-Respondents. No. 20873. Court of Appeals of Idaho. August 11, 199

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: On July 26, 1988, the bankruptcy court and the district court jointly confirmed the “Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization” (the Plan) submitted by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins). In Re A.H. Robins Co. Inc., 88 B.R. 742 (E.D.Va. 1988). Rosemary Menard-Sanford and certain other personal injury claimants, who voted against the Plan, appeal. -They challenge the district court’s a

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated petitions for review, we address approximately thirty challenges to three regulations promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency): (1) the “Major Boilers Rule,” 1 (2) the “Area Boilers Rule,” 2

[Cite as Freshwater v. Mt. Vernon City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 137 Ohio St.3d 469, 2013- Ohio-5000.] FRESHWATER, APPELLANT, v. MOUNT VERNON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Freshwater v. Mt. Vernon City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 137 Ohio St.3d 469, 2013-Ohio-5000.] R.C. 3319.16 proceeding for termination of public school teacher’s contract— Good and just cause—Insubordination defined as a willfu

17 Cal.Rptr.3d 710 (2004) 96 P.3d 30 34 Cal.4th 1 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Cynthia Lynn COFFMAN and James Gregory Marlow, Defendants and Appellants. No. S011960. Supreme Court of California. August 19, 2004. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 27, 2004. Certiorari Denied May

PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM & ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...............................................................23 II. Broad Discretion of Trial Judges to Sever Issues for Trial.......................25 A. History..............•.................................................25</

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

Supplemental Opinion Regarding Plan Conñrmation, Approving Settlements, and Approving Exit Financing STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction.159 II. The Plan CONFIRMATION Prooess. i — 1 ZD i — I A. The City’s Plans of Adjustment. i — 1 <

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed