Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John W. Fitzgerald”
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
ANITA LASTER MAYS, J.: {¶ 1} This consolidated appeal arises from the issuance of two amended qualified domestic relations orders ("QDROs") journalized on January 23, 2017. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. Background and Facts {¶ 2} On May 13, 2014, plaintiff-appellee Deborah
Estate of George Lambert v. John Arnold Fitzgeraldpublic domain
OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, CHIEF JUDGE, delivered the opinion of the court, in which .CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR. and THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, JJ., joined. George Lambert (“Lambert”) sued John Arnold Fitzgerald (“Fitzgerald”) in connection with money that Lambert gave to Fitzgerald to invest alleging claims for
Allen v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
Michael F. Urbanski, Chief United States District Judge This matter comes before the court on the Defendant-Appellants Jason Royce Allen, Kevin Chern, Law Solutions Chicago, LLC ("Law Solutions"), and UpRight Law, LLC's ("UpRight," and collectively "Petitioners") Motion to Stay (the "Motion"), ECF No. 97. Previously, the court granted a partial temporary stay until July 2, 2018 so the parties could brief and the court could consider
Metcalf v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
September 3, 2019 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT JONATHAN S. METCALF v. MICHAEL FITZGERALD ET AL. (SC 20227)
Ausmus v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. John Ausmus (“the father”) petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing *407the Madison Circuit Court (“the trial court”) to vacate its order awarding Rachael Ann Ausmus Fitzgerald (“the mother”) temporary physical custody of the parties’ minor child (“the child”), pending further order of the trial court. For the reasons set forth bel
SUPERIOR COURT OLD IRONSIDES ENERGY LLC v. MARSH & MCLENNAN AGENCY LLC; MARSH LLC; MARSH USA INC.; JOHN KURKULONIS, JR.; AND EDWARD D. FITZGERALD Docket: 1984CV00912-BLS2 Dates: June 9, 2025
Fitzgerald v. Ashleypublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania denied.
Fitzgerald v. City of Bridgeportpublic domain
ALVORD, J. The defendant Manuel Cotto 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his counterclaim and in favor of the plaintiffs. 2 The court struck Cotto's name from the eligibility list for promotion to police capta
Fitzgerald v. Arizonapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona denied.
State ex rel. Ozanne v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶ 130. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). These matters exemplify the importance of compliance with procedural rules and the rule of law to the legitimacy of our government. Just as *114there is a right way and a wrong way to proceed with the legislative process, there is a right way and a wrong way
ADEGOKE v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
784 F.Supp.2d 538 (2011) Adeshola ADEGOKE, Petitioner, v. Karen FITZGERALD, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano, Respondents. Civil Action No. 10-CV-2056. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 2, 2011. *539 John J. Hykel, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner. Colin Abbott Kisor, U.S. Department Of Justice, Wash
Charette v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
213 S.W.3d 505 (2006) Mary Helen and Gilfred CHARETTE, Appellants v. Kassie and John Blake FITZGERALD, Appellees. No. 14-05-00918-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 21, 2006. *507 James M. McGraw, Michael Antoine Ackal III, Houston, for appellants. Jenny Nguyen, Houston, for appellees. Pan
Trust Under Agreement of Edward W. Taylorpublic domain
OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: Appellants, beneficiaries of the Trust Under Agreement of Edward Winslow Taylor, appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Orphans’ Court Division, denying their petition to modify a trust agreement. Upon careful review, we reverse. The Honorable John W. Herron has set forth the relevant factual and procedural history of thi
John Fitzgerald Davis v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00081-CR JOHN FITZGERALD DAVIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 48028-A Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
John Fitzgerald Davis v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-19-00081-CR JOHN FITZGERALD DAVIS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 48028-A Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDE
Robin E. Thomas-Jones v. John Fitzgerald Jonespublic domain
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2023-1080 LT Case No. 2018-DR-002642-FM _____________________________ ROBIN E. THOMAS-JONES, Appellant, v. JOHN FITZGERALD JONES, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. James E. Kallaher, Judge. Robert W. Elrod, Jr., of
State v. Fitzgeraldpublic domain
Opinion NORCOTT, J. The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether the prosecutor’s disclosure to the judge in a bench trial of the existence of a part B information so tainted the entire trial as to require that the judgment of conviction be reversed. The state appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the defendant’s conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under
in Re: John Wesley Pattersonpublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not following a prior order of this Court. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See <
W.G.A. v. Sessionspublic domain
Hamilton, Circuit Judge. *960In 2015, tattooed members of the Mara 18 gang held a gun to petitioner W.G.A.'s head and threatened to kill him.1 The Mara 18-also known as the "Calle 18," "Barrio 18," or "Eighteenth Street" gang-is one of the two main gangs operating in El Salvador. Together with their rivals, MS-13,
Reeder John v. Billie Brewer Currypublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice MYERS. On the Court’s own motion, we withdraw the opinion and vacate the judgment of December 31, 2013. The following is now the opinion of this Court. John Reeder appeals the summary judgment that he take nothing on his claims against Billie Brewer - Curry, individually and as successor to W.C. Brewer,