Cases

ORDER Per Curiam: Mr. Ricky L. Haskins appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Ms. Jessica C. Toll. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 4, 2009 Session JOSEPH M. HASKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DREW E. HASKINS, JR., DECEASED v. DREW E. HASKINS, III Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 00-0292 Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor No. E2009-00403-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 13, 2010

Per curiam. John W. Haskins, a resident of Florida and an inactive member of the Georgia State Bar, petitioned for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law after pleading guilty to two counts of mail fraud in Florida. The State Bar made no objection. The Review Panel recommends that the petition for voluntary surrender be accepted for violation of Standard 66 of State Bar Rule 4-102, and that Haskins’ name be remov

Per curiam. John W. Haskins, a resident of Florida and an inactive member of the Georgia State Bar, petitioned for voluntary surrender of his license to practice law after pleading guilty to two counts of mail fraud in Florida. The State Bar made no objection. The Review Panel recommends that the petition for voluntary surrender be accepted for violation of Standard 66 of State Bar Rule 4-102, and that Haskins’ name be remov

224 S.W.3d 675 (2006) In re ESTATE OF Drewry E. HASKINS, Jr. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. September 19, 2006 Session. October 31, 2006. Permission to Appeal Denied March 12, 2007. *676 John P. Konvalinka, Mathew D. Brownfield, and Jennifer Hooks Lawrence, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the A

602 S.E.2d 402 (2004) 44 Va. App. 1 Jonathan Kirk HASKINS v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 1739-03-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. September 14, 2004. *403 John F. McGarvey, Richmond, for appellant. Deana A. Malek, Assistant Attorney General (Jerry W. Kilgore, Attorney General, on

22 P.3d 31 (2001) Michael W. HASKINS, Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Appellee. No. A-7435. Court of Appeals of Alaska. May 4, 2001. Robin L. Koutchak, Anchorage, for Appellant. Carmen E. ClarkWeeks and John E. McConnaughy, III, Assistant Municipal Prosecutors, and Mary K. Hughes and William A. Greene, Municipal Attorneys, Anchorage, for Appellee.

OPINION Brandon 0. Gibson, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which J. Steven Stafford, P.J., W.S., and Arnold B. Goldin, J., joined. This appeal involves a trust. A beneficiary of the trust filed this lawsuit against the bank that served as trustee of the trust, alleging that the bank mismanaged the

[Cite as State v. Haskins, 2024-Ohio-5908.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113309 v. : LAMAR HASKINS,

[1] Dorothy Garrett, personal representative of Helen M. Penrod's estate, seeks a declaratory judgment proceeding to construe the decedent's will. Specifically, the personal representative appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Orville I. Haskins. We affirm. [2] The relevant facts are not in dispute. The decedent executed a will containing a trust for the benefit of her brother, George W. Tiedeman, with a remainder interest in plaintiff. In this respect, Artic

[Cite as Haskins v. F. Leo Groff, Inc., 2025-Ohio-1850.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Edd Haskins Court of Appeals No. E-24-039 Appellant Trial Court No. 2023 CV 222 v. F. Leo Groff, Inc. et al. DECISION AND JUDGMENT

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: The parents of Meghan Threlkeld filed this legal malpractice suit against their former attorneys, the Haskins Law Firm (Has-kins). The Threlkelds allege that Haskins allowed their medical malpractice claim to prescribe against the doctor and hospital involved in Meghan’s delivery. Haskins then filed third-party claims against the doctor and the hospital for indemnity or contribution. The distr

260 N.W.2d 536 (1977) Robert A. WRIGHT, Appellee, v. John L. HASKINS, Appellant. No. 59398. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 21, 1977. *537 John F. Davis, of Lindgren, Davis & Baker, Des Moines, for appellant. Alfredo G. Parrish, Des Moines, for appellee. Heard before MOORE, C. J., and MASON, RAWLINGS, REYNOLDSON

644 S.W.2d 622 (1983) 7 Ark.App. 98 John D. TONEY, Sr., Appellant, v. John T. HASKINS, et al, Appellees. No. CA 82-166. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. January 12, 1983. Rehearing Denied February 9, 1983. *623 Hoover, Jacobs & Storey, Little Rock, for appellant. Cearley, Mitchell

198 Ga. App. 849 (1991) 403 S.E.2d 818 DELOITTE, HASKINS & SELLS v. GREEN; and vice versa. A90A2366, A90A2367. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 13, 1991. Rehearing Denied March 6, 1991. Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, John A. Chandler, John W. Bonds, Jr., Elizabeth V. Tanis, for appellant.

ORDER 1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR, District Judge Before the Court are cross-motions for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs Richard E. Haskins, Arthur L. Haskins, and the estate of Arthur “Buzz” Haskins, Jr. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek summary judgment that Defendant Employers Insurance o

David Newbern, Judge. The procedural morass which gives rise to this appeal yields an issue which is easier to decide than the facts are to describe. Basically, the question presented is whether the appellant should have been allowed to present an equitable counterclaim which was closely related to the main action and which arose after the issues had been joined in the circuit court. We hold the countercl

[Cite as Haskins v. 7112 Columbia, Inc., 2016-Ohio-5575.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT DAVID HASKINS, CO-ADMINISTRATOR ) OF THE ESTATE OF MINNIE HASKINS, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. ) CASE NO. 15 MA 0192 V.

Green, J. We are called upon to address a question raised but not resolved in U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Schumacher, 467 Mass. 421 (2014) (Schumacher): whether a notice of a mortgagor’s right to cure a mortgage loan default, sent pursuant to G. L. c. 244, § 35A, is deficient if it is sent by the mor

[Cite as Haskins v. 7112 Columbian, Inc., 2014-Ohio-4154.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT DAVID HASKINS, Co-Administrator of ) CASE NO. 13 MA 100 the Estate of Minnie Haskins ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT )