Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Tracy Fisher, Jr.”
Stanton v. Statepublic domain
AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM. McMILLAN, P.J., and SHAW, J., concur. BASCHAB, J., concurs in the result. COBB, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.
Fisher v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
Opinion LAVERY, J. The petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly dismissed his claim of *363ineffective assistance of counsel by incorrectly finding that the petitioner was not prejudiced by his trial counsel’
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Tracypublic domain
Appellant, MCI Telecommunications Corporation ("MCI"), appeals the decisions of the Ohio Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA"), wherein the BTA affirmed the final determinations of the Ohio Tax Commissioner, appellee, regarding appellant's public utility excise tax, or "gross receipts tax," liability for report years 1983, 1985, 1986 and 1987. The appeals for the above years are consolidated *Page 467 herein. Report year 1984 is not before us, as appellant has a c
Noelle Lee v. Robert Fisherpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOELLE LEE, derivatively on behalf No. 21-15923 of The Gap, Inc, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-06163- v. SK ROBERT J. FISHER; SONIA SYNGAL; ARTHUR PECK; AMY BOHUTINSKY; OPINION AMY MILES; ISABELLA D. GOREN; BOB L. MARTIN; CHRIS O'NEILL; ELIZABETH A. SMITH; JOHN J. FIS
Raina Fisher v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
06/06/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 18, 2017 Session RAINA FISHER v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 19513 Russell Parkes, Judge ___________________________________
Matter of Michelle EE. v. John EE.public domain
Matter of Michelle EE. v John EE. (2025 NY Slip Op 01019) Matter of Michelle EE. v John EE. 2025 NY Slip Op 01019 Decided on February 20, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Noelle Lee v. Robert Fisherpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOELLE LEE, derivatively on behalf No. 21-15923 of The Gap, Inc, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-06163-SK v. ROBERT J. FISHER; SONIA OPINION SYNGAL; ARTHUR PECK; AMY BOHUTINSKY; AMY MILES; ISABELLA D. GOREN; BOB L. MARTIN; CHRIS O'NEILL; ELIZABETH A. SMITH; JOHN J. FISHER; JORGE P. MONTOYA; MAY
Fisher v. Laddpublic domain
268 S.E.2d 20 (1980) 47 N.C. App. 587 Virginia C. FISHER, Successor Trustee under the Will of Oliver D. Fisher; Annie Clee High Fisher, Widow; Robert L. Fisher and wife, Virginia H. Fisher; Randolph D. Fisher and wife, Virginia C. Fisher, Individually; Margaret F. Jones, Widow; Hazel F. Griffin and husband, George R. Griffin; Buck Fisher and wife, Doris L. Fisher; Carolyn F. Joyner and husband, G. Herman Joyner; Peggy F. Snipes an
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge: Appellants Danny Maddox and Norman L. Robinson challenge their convictions on a variety of drug-related charges stemming from their participation in a series of drug transactions with a police informant in 1992. Officers of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA
In Re Baileypublic domain
976 A.2d 176 (2009) In re Patrick E. BAILEY, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. No. 05-BG-842. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 2, 2007. Decided July 23, 2009. *177 Stephen Andrew Armstrong, Fairfax, VA, for respondent. Judith Hetherton, Senior Assist
In Re Zakroffpublic domain
934 A.2d 409 (2007) In re Robert Joel ZAKROFF, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 163337). No. 05-BG-740. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 5, 2007. Decided October 25, 2007. *411 Robert Joel Zakroff, pro se. John Thomas Rooney
John J. Kennelly v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 05 2018, 8:36 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Alfredo Suarez, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 07-17-00047-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 8/2/2017 3:07 PM
Pinkney v. United Statespublic domain
851 A.2d 479 (2004) Tracy PINKNEY, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 98-CF-131, 01-CO-899. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued May 28, 2003. Decided June 17, 2004. *482 Thomas D. Engle, appointed by the court, with whom Sharon L. Burka was on the brief, for appellant. David P. Cora, Assis
State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 12, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID HOOPER CLIMER, JR. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. H 8704 Clayburn Peeples, Judge No. W2010-01667-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 14, 2011 A Gibson County Circuit Court jury convicted the appellant, David Hooper Climer, Jr., o
Jones v. Statespublic domain
REID, Associate Judge: The only issue presented on appeal in this homicide case is whether the trial court properly denied appellant John Jones’ motion to suppress identification testimony.1 Mr. Jones contends that “he *972was denied his rights under the [Fifth] Amendment to the Constitution because [ ] the pretrial identification proced
Cannon v. United Statespublic domain
838 A.2d 293 (2003) Antonio CANNON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 00-CF-811. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted April 23, 2003. Decided December 18, 2003. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing March 2, 2004. *294 Antonio Cannon filed a brief pro se. Roscoe C. Howard,
Nixon v. United Statespublic domain
870 A.2d 100 (2005) Allen NIXON, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 02-CM-466. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted March 26, 2003. Decided March 17, 2005. *101 Hope Umana, appointed by the court, was on the brief for appellant. Roscoe C. Howard, Jr., United States Attorney at the time t
Arndt v. City of Colorado Springspublic domain
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER DECIDING PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM OF DISPARATE IMPACT DISCRIMINATION Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge The Second Amended Complaint, filed February 1, 2016, includes a claim that the use of a physical fitness test to determine *1073continuation of employment as Colorado Springs Police Officers has had a disparate impact o
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20