Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Taylor”
JOHN TAYLOR v. ARGOS, USApublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MARKLE, J., LAND and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules January 31, 2
JOHN TAYLOR v. ARGOS, USApublic domain
SECOND DIVISION MARKLE, J., LAND and DAVIS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 25, 2
John Taylor v. Argos USApublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, December 21, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0168. JOHN TAYLOR v. ARGOS USA et al. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order
John Taylor v. 386 McDonough LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, February 12, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0236. JOHN TAYLOR et al v. 386 MCDONOUGH LLC. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: SUCV2024003023 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
John Taylor v. Michael Huertapublic domain
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: Congress has charged the Federal Aviation Administration with maintaining the safety of the Nation’s air traffic. As small unmanned aircraft (sometimes known as drones) have become more popular, the number of unmanned aircraft-related safety incidents has increased. In 2015, in an effort to address that trend, the FAA promulgated a rule known as the R
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 26, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A24D0397. JOHN TAYLOR et al. v. BLACKSTONE RESIDENTIAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP. John Taylor and all other occupants of a residential property in Henry County are before this Court once more, this time purportedly seeking discretionary review of a June 202
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 21, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0020. JOHN TAYLOR et al v. BLACKSTONE RESIDENTIAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: SUCV2021002723 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 26, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0399. JOHN TAYLOR et al v. BLACKSTONE RESIDENTIAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: SUCV2021002723 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 11, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A23D0006. JOHN TAYLOR et al. v. BLACKSTONE RESIDENTIAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: SUCV2021002723 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Christopher John Taylor v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00398-CR CHRISTOPHER JOHN TAYLOR, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 4
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 24, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A22D0424. JOHN TAYLOR et al. v. BLACKSTONE RESIDENTIAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, LP. This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After the magistrate court entered a writ of possession in favor of the plaintiff Blackstone Residential Ope
Christopher John Taylor v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals Third District of Texas P.O. BOX 12547. AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711-2547 www,txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733 JEFF L ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFREY D. KYLE. CLERK DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON. JUST
Sallie Lunn Tarver v. John Taylor Tarverpublic domain
03/13/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 16, 2019 Session SALLIE LUNN TARVER v. JOHN TAYLOR TARVER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-000207-14 Robert Samual Weiss, Judge ___________________________________
John Taylor, Jr. v. James Brownpublic domain
SYKES, Circuit Judge. John Taylor, an Illinois prisoner, filed suit against several prison officials alleging various civil-rights violations, but his complaint included misjoined claims, one of which was a failure-to-proteet claim against Officer James Brown. A magistrate judge issued a show-cause order indicating that he was inclined to sever the claims but that Taylor could avo
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-01001-CV JOHN TAYLOR AND PENNELOPIA TAYLOR, Appellants V. ANDREW MISSICK AND BONNALYN MISSICK, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 & Probate Court Brazoria County, Texas
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Humphreys, Chafin and AtLee Argued at Lexington, Virginia PUBLISHED JOHN TAYLOR OPINION BY v. Record No. 1593-18-3 JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS APRIL 30, 2019
John Taylor, Jr. v. James Brownpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 12‐1710 JOHN E. TAYLOR, JR., Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. JAMES BROWN, Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court
People of Michigan v. John Taylorpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 6, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143417
John Taylor v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Dec 29 2015, 8:57 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Michael R. Fisher Gregory F. Zoeller
John Taylor v. Argos USApublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 24, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26D0621. JOHN TAYLOR v. ARGOS USA. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 26CV3670 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, At