Cases

*257 OPINION McKEE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Jim Thorpe, multi-sport Olympic gold medalist (“Thorpe”), died in California in 1953 without a will. 1 His estate was assigned to his third wife, Pat

MEMORANDUM ERIC L. FRANK, CHIEF U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Joseph G. Mirarehi Legal Services, P.C., a law firm in which Joseph G. Mirarehi (“Mr. Mirarehi”) is the sole practitioner,1 has filed a motion (“the Mirarehi Motion”) seeking payment of $113,400.00 that has been placed in the bankruptcy court clerk’s registry. The $113,400.00 constitutes

G. KENDALL SHARP, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes for consideration on Defendant BJ's Restaurants Inc.'s ("BJ's) Dispositive Motion for Final Summary Judgment (the "Motion") (Doc. 16), to which Plaintiffs Elizabeth Thorpe ("E. Thorpe") and John Clark Williams, II ("Williams") (collectively, the "Plaintiffs") filed a response in opposition (Doc. 26) and BJ's replied (Doc. 32). For the reasons that follow, the Mot

*233MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THORPE & DESROSIERS’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 56) AND LE-AHY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 61) HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE. This case arises from Bruce and. Lori Bazinet’s encounter with police on July 29, 2012, which began with Bruce’s suicidal behavior and ended with an allegedly falsely procu

MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. Plaintiffs, Dalé and Renee Thorpe, filed suit alleging that after they purchased a 149-acre property in Upper Makefield Township, they were discriminated against on the basis of ethnicity in violation of their rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and suffered tortious interference with contract

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1714 Doc: 56 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1714 WILLIAM THORPE; FREDERICK HAMMER; DMITRY KHAVKIN; GERALD MCNABB; GARY WALL; VERNON BROOKS; BRIAN CAVITT; DEREK CORNELISON; CHRI

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge In this Olmstead action, plaintiffs, who include nine 1 current and former nursing facility residents, claim that the District of Columbia (“District” or “defendant”) px-ovides Medicaid-funded l

677 F.3d 869 (2012) In the Matter of THORPE INSULATION COMPANY, Debtor, Motor Vehicle Casualty Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha; Century Indemnity Company, successor to Cigna Specialty Insurance Company, FKA California Union Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Thorpe Insulation Company; Pacific Insulation Company, Appellees, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, as successor by merger to Transcontinental Insurance

671 F.3d 980 (2012) In the Matter of THORPE INSULATION COMPANY, Debtor, Motor Vehicle Casualty Company; Central National Insurance Company of Omaha; Century Indemnity Company, successor to Cigna Specialty Insurance Company, fka California Union Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Thorpe Insulation Company; Pacific Insulation Company, Appellees, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, as successor by merger to Transcontinental Insurance

OMNIBUS ORDER URSULA UNGARO, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant H. Marc Helm’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint, D.E. 76, and Defendants Walter Investment Management, Corporation, Mark J. O’Brien, Denmar Dixon, Keith A. Anderson, Brian Corey and Charles E. Cauthen’s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Class Action Complaint, D.E. 77. On Februa

107 P.3d 1064 (2004) John K. THORPE, Elisha E. Sprong, Darrell J. Vigil, Sean P. Ley, and Hector Juarez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE of Colorado and Fred Fisher in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue and Tax Collector for the State of Colorado, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03CA0243. Colorado Cour

671 F.3d 1011 (2012) In the Matter of THORPE INSULATION CO., Debtor. Continental Insurance Company, as successor in interest to certain policies issued by Harbor Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Thorpe Insulation Company, Appellee, and Official Creditors' Committee of Thorpe Insulation Company and Pacific Insulation Company, Movant, Future Claims Representative, Real-party-in-interest. No. 10-55744.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION May 28, 2025 Plaintiff-Appellee,

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Trelliny T. Turner appeals her convictions and 240-month sentence for multiple offenses arising out of her role in the theft of approximately $266,000 from a U.S. Post Office in Valdosta, Georgia on September 3, 2004. On appeal, Turner argues that the district court erred by admitting hearsay testimony, in violation of Bruton

Randolph, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 This is an appeal from the decision of the district court refusing to enjoin the Federal Election Commission from releasing information identifying a trust and its trustee in connection with a misreported federal campaign contribution. Doe v. FEC ,

ACCEPTED 15-24-00095-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/3/2025 3:39 PM No. 15-24-00095-CV CHRISTOPHER A. P

OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Roy Thompson acts as a trustee for a trust whose investment accounts were formerly managed by defendant Leonel Federico. Plaintiff alleges the trust suffered about $1 million in losses under Federico’s watch. In an attempt to recover those losses, plaintiff brings negligence and fraud claims against Federico and his employer, Citigroup Global Markets, f/

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) sets forth with specificity the standing requirements that must be satisfied by a party seeking to bring suit under the statute. Finding these requirements unmet, the district court properly dismissed Shirley Stewart’s action for lack of standing. This court now reverses. Because the majority interprets ERISA in a m

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0099p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, │ Plaintif

824 F.2d 897 ROSENTHAL TOYOTA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,v.Jay M. THORPE, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,andGold Key Leasing, Inc., a Florida Corporation, John M.Mannone, John F. Troy, Defendants. No. 86-3538. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 14, 1987. Rich