Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Roy & Son, Inc.”
Roy Young & Sons Paving, Inc. v. Ashpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by John L. Ash and Fast Lube America, Inc., appellants/defendants1 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “F.L.A.”), from an order by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County denying their post-trial motion for a new trial. Roy Young & Sons Paving, Inc., appellee/plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Young & Sons Paving”), brought this action alleging that F.L.A.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-IA-00037-SCT REX DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC, MITCHELL BEVERAGE, LLC, MITCHELL REX DISTRIBUTING, LLC, MITCHELL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC. AND D.G. YUENGLING AND SON, INCORPORATED d/b/a D.G. YUENGLING & SON, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/15/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROGER T. CLARK TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ALYSSON LEIGH MILLS NATHAN LA
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 89]. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendant’s Motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The following facts are undisputed unless noted otherwise. Plaintiff Advanced Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc
Roy Kirby & Sons, Inc. v. Quinteropublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. The Court having denied the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, 313 Md. 8, 542 A.2d 845, and The Court thereafter having issued an order requiring the petitioners to show cause under Md.Rule 1-341 why the Court should not require the petitioners to pay the respondents the costs of the proceedings and the reasonable expenses including reasonable a
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: This appeal addresses the computation of economic losses arising out of the BP oil spill and based on the BP Settlement Agreement. In an attempt to adhere to our decision in In re Deepwater Horizon (“Deepwater Horizon I”), 732 F.3d 326 (5th Cir. 2013), the district court has approved a policy adopted by the Claims Administrator known as Policy 495. Policy 495 consists of five methodol
Chavez v. McDonald's Restaurant of Florida, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. David Chavez appeals the final summary judgment rendered in favor of McDonald’s Restaurant of Florida, Inc., the defendant in the personal injury action Chavez filed claiming damages from his slip and fall on McDonald’s Restaurant’s premises. We conclude that Chavez, a business invitee on the premises of McDonald’s Restaurant, was owed a duty of care and that material issues of fact exist that prohibit entry of
PER CURIAM: In its Petition for Panel Rehearing, BP asserts that the panel opinion rests upon an argument that was never raised. Specifically, BP asserts that Class Counsel never argued that Policy 495’s Industry-Specific Methodologies (“ISMs”) are inconsistent with the text of the BP Settlement Agreement. That is simply inaccurate. In fact, Class Counsel explicitly argued that Policy 495 “Departs from the Terms of the' Settle
06/28/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 20, 2019 Session ROY EDWARD BANE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MARTHA HARRISON BANE v. JOHN BANE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cocke County No. 2014-CV-103 Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor
MILLARD EARL KITZMILLER v. ROY KITZMILLERpublic domain
08/18/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2025 MILLARD EARL KITZMILLER v. ROY KITZMILLER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Washington County No. 19-CV-0811 John C. Rambo, Chancellor No. E2023-01834-COA-R3-CV
Justice BREYERdelivered the opinion of the Court. Texas offers automobile owners a choice between ordinary and specialty license plates. Those who want the State to issue a particular specialty plate may propose a plate design, comprising a slogan, a graphic, or (most commonly) both. If the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles Board approves the design, the State will make it available
Roy Carlus Riley & J&R Mfg., Inc. v. Barringerpublic domain
James P. Jones, United States District Judge The plaintiffs, a business corporation and its president, allege in this case that defendant Teresa B. Barringer was a long-time company employee in charge of the company's finances and a fiduciary of the company's retirement plan. It is claimed that she engaged in a fraudulent scheme to embezzle money from the company and pay portions of it into her own retirement account, as well as to
Pierson v. Orlando Regional Healthcare Systems, Inc.public domain
619 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2009) Raymond H. PIERSON, III, Plaintiff, and Joanne R. Werntz, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Erik Lieberman, as personal representative of the Estate of Phillip G. Spiegel; Roger Murbach; Steven Appleblatt; Frank Bone; William Bott; Thomas Csencsitz; J. Dean Cole; John Hillenmeyer; J. David Moser; N. Donald Diebel; Rory Evans; Manuel J. Galceran; Hedrick J. Rivero; C. Gordon Wolfram;
Dufficy & Sons, Inc. v. BRW, Inc.public domain
74 P.3d 380 (2002) DUFFICY & SONS, INC., d/b/a Central Denver Ironworks, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRW, INC., a Wyoming corporation, and Professional Service Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01CA2201. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II. November 21, 2002. Rehearing Denied January 9, 2003.
Roy v. Woodstock Community Trust, Inc.public domain
Dooley, J. ¶ 1. This case arises out of a proposed housing development in West Woodstock, Vermont. It is not the first case to come before us related to this development. In In re Woodstock Community Trust & Housing Vermont PRD, 2012 VT 87, 192 Vt. 474, 60 A.3d 686, we affirmed the permits for the project granted by the town development review board and the district environmental commission and affirmed by the Enviro
Roy Crook & Sons, Inc. v. Allenpublic domain
RANDALL, Circuit Judge. Captain Newell Allen drowned in the Gulf of Mexico on July 5, 1981, while attempting to bring in the anchor of the M/V Lady Patricia, a ship then owned by Roy Crook & Sons, Inc. After a two day non-jury trial, the district court calculated the *1038value of the loss to the claimants (Allen’s family) at $384,204. However, the court furthe
FORTUNATO P. BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge: This action involves the Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) approved by the district court on December 21, 2012, between Appellants BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, and BP p.l.c. (collectively, “BP”), and Appellees, the certified Economic and Property Damages Class, in connection with the Deepwater Horizon <
Digitally signed by Illinois Official Reports Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this doc
Roy v. Dackmanpublic domain
Jakeem Roy v. Sandra B. Dackman, et al, No. 6, September Term, 2015. Opinion by Harrell, J. Appeal and Error – Extent of Review Dependent on Nature of Decision Appealed From The typical standard for appellate review of a grant of summary judgment is whether the circuit court was legally correct, with the circuit court’s ruling being granted no deference. Appeal and Error – Extent of Review – Dual Nature of Proce
Scott v. Ranch Roy-L, Inc.public domain
242 S.W.3d 401 (2007) James SCOTT, John R. Kuhlmann, Jr. and Golden Eagle Reserve Association, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. RANCH ROY-L, INC., Gary Schaeffer and Jill M. Schaeffer, Defendants/Respondents. No. ED 88991. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. October 16, 2007. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied November 27, 2007.
Barry Haynes and Roy Collins Construction Company, Inc. v. Dorothy Beckward and Samuel Beckwardpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01508-COA BARRY HAYNES AND ROY COLLINS APPELLANTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. DOROTHY BECKWARD AND SAMUEL APPELLEES BECKWARD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LINDA F. COLEMAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: BOLIVAR C