Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Rainey Parker, Jr.”
Parker v. Parkerpublic domain
55 S.W.3d 773 (2001) 75 Ark.App. 90 Louanne PARKER v. John Matthew PARKER. No. CA 00-331. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division III. September 19, 2001. *775 Kent J. Rubens, West Memphis and William Palma Rainey, Marion, for appellant. Goodwin, Moore, Colbert, Broadway & Gray, LLP, by Harry Tru
Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Raineypublic domain
| JETERS, J., dissenting. For the reasons discussed in my dissent in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s opinion in this matter. I would reverse the trial court’s grant of the summary judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Raineypublic domain
DOUCET, Chief Judge. For the reasons set forth in Glod v. Baker, 02-988 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/6/03), 851 So.2d 1255, 2003 WL 21804398, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal shall be paid two-thirds by Baker and Baiers, and one-third by Vivi-ano and his entities not to include the two LLCs. AFFIRMED.
Godley v. Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Raineypublic domain
NED E. DOUCET, JR., Chief Judge. For the reasons set forth in Glod v. Baker, 02-988 (La.App. 3 Cir. 8/6/03), 851 So.2d 1255, 2003 WL 21804398, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal shall be paid two-thirds by Baker and Baiers, and one-third by Vivi-ano and his entities not to include the two LLCs. AFFIRMED.
Courtney L. Rainey v. State of Mississippipublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CT-01651-SCT COURTNEY L. RAINEY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/24/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: BRYAN P. BUCKLEY DARLA Y. MANNERY-PALMER E. CARLOS TANNER, III KATIE NICOLE MOULDS
Roy E. Addicks, Jr. v. John A. Rupertpublic domain
NO. 12-09-00288-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ROY E. ADDICKS, JR., APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE369TH V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, JOHN A. RUPERT, ELIZABETH A. MILLER, DONNA FLETCHER, SHARON K. DIF
Roy E. Addicks, Jr. v. John A. Rupertpublic domain
NO NO. 12-09-00288-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
State of Tennessee v. Walter Clyde Rainey, Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 14, 2002 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WALTER CLYDE RAINEY, JR. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County Nos. 12297-12307 Robert L. Jones, Judge No. M2001-01870-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 6, 2003 The appellant, Walter Clyde Rainey, Jr., was con
Tim Parker v. Jim Duboispublic domain
OPINION Mary K. Hoff, Judge Tim Parker (Parker) appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Jim Dubois (Dubois) on Parker’s personal injury suit. Because of significant deficiencies in Parker’s appellate brief, under Rule 84.04, we dismiss the appeal without reaching the merits of the trial court’s judgment.
Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co. v. Dresser Industriespublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: On behalf of itself and the other interest-holders in 523 West Texas oil wells, Parker & Parsley Petroleum Company (“Parker & Parsley”) filed suit in federal district court against Dresser Industries, Inc., Titan Services, Inc., BJ Services U.S.A., Inc., BJ-Hughes Holding Company, Baker Hughes Production Tools, Inc., and
Frye v. Smithpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 884 Wesley Frye, as personal representative of the estate of Rhonda Rainey, deceased, and Roderick Stacy Arthur, as father and next friend of Ryan Arthur and Roderick Arthur, minors (collectively, "the plaintiffs"), appeal from the order of the Calhoun Circuit Court dismissing their claims against John F. Smith,
Parker v. Henderson County, Tennesseepublic domain
450 F.Supp.2d 842 (2006) Jonathan PARKER, Plaintiff, v. HENDERSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE, et al., Defendants. No. 05-1358 B. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division. August 29, 2006. *843 *844 *845 Jeff Boyd with Hill-Boren, Jackson, TN, f
State v. Parkerpublic domain
661 So.2d 603 (1995) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Charles H. PARKER, Jr., Appellant. No. 27417-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. September 27, 1995. *605 Paul H. Kidd, Monroe, George M. Strickler, Jr., New Orleans, for appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, Baton Rouge, William R. Coenen, Jr., Dis
MEDIOSTREAM, INC. v. Microsoft Corp.public domain
749 F.Supp.2d 507 (2010) MEDIOSTREAM, INC. v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION. Case No. 2:08-CV-369-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. October 29, 2010. *510 Byron Willie Cooper, Andy H. Chan, Charles F. Koch, Gregory Scott Bishop, Rebecca L. Unruh, Ruby Wood, Goodwin Procter LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Elizabeth L.
Ponder v. Lincoln Nat. Sales Corp.public domain
The plaintiff appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his amended complaint asserting a contractual cause of action based on economic duress. We affirm. The undisputed facts are as follows: In September 1977, Lincoln National Sales Corporation leased an office complex from Jack Ponder, d/b/a Ponder Properties, pursuant to a lease agreement that required an annual rental payment of $5.50 per square foot for a 3-year period. The lease also offered Lincoln National the
Horton v. Kronerpublic domain
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING The opinion in this case dated October 26, 1990, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted therefor. George W. and Mary Jo Kroner, husband and wife, sued for a declaratory judgment, requesting the trial court to resolve a dispute with Charles and Georgia Carol Horton, owners of adjoining property, concerning the ownership of a strip of land. On this strip of land, adjacent to the Kroners' property, was a dirt road that
Taylor v. Loma Alta Towers, Inc.public domain
John S. and Helen H. Taylor, husband and wife, petition this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering Judge Robert E.L. Key to set aside his transfer of their case from Mobile County to Baldwin County. We deny the writ. The facts relevant to the present action are as follows: In April 1988, Mr. and Mrs. Taylor inquired into an advertisement in the Mobile Press Register offering for sale condominium units at Loma Alta Towers. The advertisement represented that 65% o
Fitzpatrick v. Hoehnpublic domain
PARKER, Justice. *617This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of an action initiated in the Baldwin Circuit Court by Roman Hoehn Fitzpatrick against Margaret Hoehn ("Margaret"). Facts and Procedural History John Hoehn ("John") and his wife, Margaret, jointly owned the Foley Flea Market located at 14809 H
Fitzpatrick v. Hoehnpublic domain
PARKER, Justice. *617This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of an action initiated in the Baldwin Circuit Court by Roman Hoehn Fitzpatrick against Margaret Hoehn ("Margaret"). Facts and Procedural History John Hoehn ("John") and his wife, Margaret, jointly owned the Foley Flea Market located at 14809 H
Lightner v. Hampton Hall Club, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE FEW: I concur with the majority opinion except for subsection III.A. As to that subsection, I concur only with the result reached by the majority because I have one important disagreement regarding the application of our rules of statutory interpretation. This Court has repeatedly held, “Where the statute’s language is plain and unambiguous, and conveys a clear and definite meaning, the rules of