Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Peter Satterfield”
Satterfield v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.public domain
569 F.3d 946 (2009) Laci SATTERFIELD, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., a New York corporation;Ipsh!Net, a Delaware corporation akaIpsh, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-16356. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2009. Filed June 19, 2009.
Satterfield v. Claypolepublic domain
438 S.E.2d 564 (1993) 190 W.Va. 384 Lowell SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. Eugene CLAYPOLE, Marion Russell, Gary Jordan, James Rowan, James Slusser, Jerry Miller, John Darcus, and Rick Yanero, Individually and as Representatives and Officials of U.M.W.A. District 31, an Unincorporated Labor Association, and U.M.W.A. District 31, Defendants Below, U.M.W.A. District 31, Appellant. No. 215
State v. Satterfieldpublic domain
DECISION On June 21, 2016, the Defendant’s suspended sentence was revoked for violations of the conditions of his probation and was sentenced as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of ten (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Burglary, a Felony, in violation of §45-6-204, MCA; and Count II: A commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of ten (1
Satterfield v. Statepublic domain
309 Ga. 843 FINAL COPY S20A0878. SATTERFIELD v. THE STATE. ELLINGTON, Justice. A Muscogee County jury found Patrick Satterfield guilty of felony murder and other crimes in connection with the death of Richard Boynton.1 On appeal, Satterfield contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdicts and that his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm for the reasons set forth below. Satterfield and Christopher Young were tried together in 2010
Satterfield v. Karnespublic domain
736 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2010) Michelle L. SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff, v. James A. KARNES, in both his individual and official capacities, Franklin County Sheriff, Defendant. Case No. 2:08-cv-387. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 23, 2010. *1142 Edward Reilley Forman, Marshall and Morrow LLC, John Spencele
Doug Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 8, 2008 Session DOUG SATTERFIELD v. BREEDING INSULATION COMPANY ET AL. Appeal by permission from the Court of Appeals, Eastern Section Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-14000 W. Dale Young, Judge No. E2006-00903-SC-R11-CV - Filed September 9, 2008 This appeal
Satterfield v. Simon & Schusterpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LACI SATTERFIELD, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, No. 07-16356 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No. CV-06-02893-CW SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., a New OPINION York corporation; IPSH!NET,
John D. Messmore v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 19 2020, 8:28 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Ap
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNT
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Individually and as Successor to Mundet Cork Corporation, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-04-00518-CV Rosemarie Satterfield, as Representative of the Estate of Jerrold Braley, Deceased, Appellant v. <
Boucher v. Satterfieldpublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Judge Peters: It may be inferred from what is stated in the bill of exceptions that it contains all .the evidence adduced on the trial by appellant, but there is no statement that it contains all the evidence heard on the trial on behalf of appellee. And in the absence of such statement this court can not reverse a judgment because it is founded on a verdict rendered-contrary to eviden
ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Davidsonpublic domain
715 F.Supp. 775 (1989) AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Sharon DAVIDSON, Defendant. Civ. A. No. J88-0545(L). United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. April 28, 1989. Ben L. Riddick, David A. Barfield and Wes W. Peters, Satterfield & Allred, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiff. John Gordon Roach, Jr., Roach & McMill
Satterfield v. Garmirepublic domain
MOSK, J. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered after a general demurrer had been sustained to their amended complaint seeking damages for wrongful death and personal injuries from defendant in his capacity as executor of the estate of Robert P. Garmire, the alleged tortfeasor. Our task is to determine whether the action is barred by Probate Code section 707, which provides that such claims must be presented to th
764 F.2d 1008 1987 A.M.C. 156 James E. WHEELER, Appellant,v.MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.William J. EDWARDS, Appellant,v.MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.Gale YOUNG, Appellant,v.MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.Charles E. SATTERFIELD, Appellant,v.MARINE NAVIGATION SULPHUR CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.John C. ZBIEGIEN, A
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. The issue is the ownership of a tract of land included in a grant to the predecessor of the Railroad and claimed by the appellees-plaintiffs (herein referred to collectively as the Walter Group) on the grounds that the grant was an easement, that the easement has terminated, and that they, as owners of the servient estate, hold the tract free of the
United States v. Ausbypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge On the evening of December 14, 1971, Deborah Noel was violently raped and murdered in her apartment in northwest Washington, D.C. Around 5 P.M. that day, Noel had left work early to prepare dinner for her boyfriend, but when he had arrived at her apartment close to an hour later, he received no response when he knocked on her door. After knocking again more for
United States v. Staglianopublic domain
693 F.Supp.2d 25 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. John STAGLIANO, et al., Defendants. Criminal Action No. 08-93 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 19, 2010. *27 Pamela Stever Satterfield, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION <