Cases

OPINION GEMMILL, Judge. ¶ 1 We address in this opinion the continuing problem of whether a premature notice of appeal has triggered this court’s appellate jurisdiction. Plaintiff John P. Baker, an inmate in the Arizona Department of Corrections (“ADOC”), appeals the superior court’s dismissal of his complaint. Baker filed a *478notice of appeal pri

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

ORDER John J. McConnell, Jr., United States District Judge On January 8, 2016, the law firm of Baker, Braverman & Barbadoro, P.C. (“Baker”) sent Lloyd Amesbury a letter indicating that he was in default on his mortgage and that he owed $8,274.37 in back payment, interest, and late charges. He received two additional cure amounts, one in April for $14,801.45 and one in May as part of a proof of claim i

OPINION BRYNER, Chief Justice. I. INTRODUCTION In 2002, after multiple appeals to this court, the superior court referred a child custody dispute between Anita John and John Baker to the Native Village of North-way tribal court. After the referral, the Child Support Enforcement Division asked the superior court whether its standing child support order — which had been issued

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification [Docket Entry #341], Defendants’ Response and Brief on Price Impact [Docket Entry # 572], and Plaintiffs’ Price Impact Memorandum [Docket Entry # 594]. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, only with respect to the

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PER CURIAM: This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court, No. 13-317, Halliburton Co., et al. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., fka Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. following the Court’s grant of a Writ of Certiorari to consider our affir-mance of the district court’s judgment. The Supreme Court reverse

Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. Investors can recover damages in a private securities fraud action only if they prove that they relied on the defendant's misrepresentation in deciding to buy or sell a company's stock. In Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224,

Reversed. Remanded.

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, *259Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its November 27, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the petition for revie

MATTHEWS, Justice, concurring. Joined by Justice Compton, I dissented in the first decision in this case.1 My view was and is that tribes, absent an act of Congress, do not have jurisdiction to decide child eusto-dy cases that do not arise in Indian Country. But the majority opinion took the opposite view. It may be that other courts, or this court in future cases, will decide th

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees, a putative class of plaintiffs, seek to recover damages from Defendants-Appellants for securities fraud under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The district court concluded that Defendants-Appellants were not entitled to use evidence of no market price impact to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of relianc

OPINION ¶ 1 Appellant John P. Baker, a prisoner in a state correctional institution, appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his claims against employees of the Arizona Department of Corrections ("ADOC") for alleged civil rights violations asserted under a federal statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2003). The sole *Page 322 issue raised on appeal is whether Baker was required to exha

17 So.3d 720 (2009) PLAZA COURT, L.P., Appellant, v. Shane BAKER-CHAPUT and Christine O'Brien, Appellees. Nos. 5D08-899, 5D08-1188. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 26, 2009. *721 David R. Lenox, Amanda L. Chapman and Sarah S. Slaughter, of Greenspoon, Marder, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant. John L.

WIGGINS, Justice. Employers appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to a city and a human rights commission based on the conclusion that the city and the commission did not violate the employers’ consti *49 tutional rights when the city and the commission attempted to enforce an anti-disc

*743 OPINION FABE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Seeking sole custody of his two children, John Baker, a member of Northway Village, filed a custody petition in the Northway Tribal Court. Anita John, the children’s mother and a member of Mentasta Village, consented to Northway’s jurisdiction. After the tribal court is

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. Attorney David G. Baker appeals an order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court imposing a sanction on him for twice describing the applicable law in a manner that it deemed to be misleading. Finding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in construing Baker’s submissions as sufficiently misleading so as to warrant a sanction, we affirm.

CALABRIA, Judge. Where there was substantial evidence of "serious physical injury" for the jury to consider the charge of felony child abuse, the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to dismiss that charge. We find no error. I. Factual and Procedural Background In late April and early May of 2013, Justin O'Brien Baker ("defendant") was dating S.R., and lived with her and her

SCHROEDER, Justice pro tem. I. NATURE OF THE CASE This is an easement dispute arising out of Kootenai County. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Marian B. Baker, Trustee of the Marian B. Baker Trust ("Baker"), for an easement over a logging road ("Alexanna Lane") that crosses the property of KAL, LLC ("KAL"). Initially ther

OPINION QUIST, District Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants in this securities fraud case are investors in the stock of Intrenet, Inc. (“Intrenet” and the “Company”). Defendants-appellees are two Intrenet officers (the “Individual Defendants”) and Intrenet’s outside auditor, Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”). Plaintiffs’ amended consolidated class action complai

263 F.Supp.2d 1161 (2003) Rita Lynn BAKER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MORRELL & CO., Defendant. No. C01-4003-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. May 21, 2003. *1167 Jay Elliot Denne, Stanley E. Munger, Munger, Reinschmidt & Denne, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Gary P. Thimsen, Melanie L. Carpen