Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00364-CV Terry and Phyllis Price, Michaela Watson, and Robert L. Mays, Jr., Appellants

EFiled: Jul 11 2024 03:04PM EDT Filing ID 73633189 Case Number 3,2024 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TED D. KELLNER, § § No. 3, 2024 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant/Cross-Appellee, § Court Below: Court of Chancery

(2008) NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ACM CONTRACTORS, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-07-1898. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. April 16, 2008. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge. The court, having carefully considered the Magistrat

IHOP IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-92-556-CV NEW BRAUNFELS FACTORY OUTLET CENTER, INC., EDWARD K. K

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA

267 B.R. 118 (2001) In re NWFX, INC., Northwest Financial Express, Inc., and Gold Financial Express, Inc., Debtors. No. 86-15148F. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division. June 22, 2001. *119 *120 *121 *122

12 F.3d 1485 62 USLW 2373, 23 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 150 Patrick J. MURPHY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al.,Defendants-Appellants.Patrick J. MURPHY, an Individual; Murphy's Markets, Inc., aCalifornia Corporation; Ramsey Marketing and Management Co.("Ramco"); aka Ramsay Marketing and Management Co., aCalifornia Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.<

535 U.S. 467 (2002) VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. No. 00-511. United States Supreme Court. Argued October 10, 2001. Decided May 13, 2002.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT *469 *469</

46 B.R. 781 (1984) In re FARMERS & RANCHERS LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC., Debtor. In re Billy Gene and Mary Lavone DAVIS, Debtors. Billy Gene DAVIS and Mary Lavone Davis, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. FARMERS & RANCHERS LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy Nos. 84-09, 84-10, Adv. Nos. 84-128, 84-131.

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 7, 2013 June 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover,

5 F.2d 191 (1925) UNITED STATES v. CHEMICAL FOUNDATION, Inc. No. 3160. Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. March 26, 1925. *192 Harlan F. Stone, Atty. Gen., James M. Beck, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., James H. Hughes, Jr., U. S. Atty., of Wilmington, Del., Herman J. Galloway, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of Washington, D. C.,

OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff World Fuel Services Trading, DMCC (“Plaintiff” or ‘WFS DMCC”), a cross-motion for summary judgment filed by claimant Hebei Prince Shipping Company, Ltd. (“Claimant” or “Prince”), and a motion by Claimant seeking additional discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d).

RECORD IMPOUNDED NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2069-21 A-2936-21 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DARRYL NIEVES, Defendant-Respondent. APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION ___________

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 656–747 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Since the dawn of time, children have engaged in challenging but normal adolescent behavior in school settings. Indeed, this is perhaps the one point on which the parties in this matter agree. For just as long, presumably wiser, more level-headed adults have responded and have successfully utilized deescalatio

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AL OTRO LADO, a California Nos. 22-55988 corporation; ABIGAIL DOE; 22-56036 BEATRICE DOE; CAROLINA DOE; DINORA DOE; INGRID DOE; D.C. No. URSULA DOE; VICTORIA DOE; 3:17-cv-02366- BIANCA DOE; JUAN DOE; BAS-KSC ROBERTO DOE; CESAR DOE; MARIA DOE; EMILIANA DOE, individually and on behalf of

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT AL OTRO LADO, a California Nos. 22-55988 corporation; ABIGAIL DOE; 22-56036 BEATRICE DOE; CAROLINA DOE; DINORA DOE; INGRID DOE; D.C. No. URSULA DOE; VICTORIA DOE; 3:17-cv-02366- BIANCA DOE; JUAN DOE; BAS-KSC ROBERTO DOE; CESAR DOE; MARIA DOE; EMILIANA DOE, ORDER AND

GUIDRY, J., dissenting. [jAt issue in this appeal is not whether the Dillons were granted a jury trial, but whether they were entitled to a new jury. The opinion asserts that a party is entitled to a jury that continues to be qualified under the criteria required by law. As a preliminary matter, it is observed that on appeal, the appellants simply argued that they were prejudiced by the use of the same ju

590 F.3d 325 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John H. WHITFIELD; Paul S. Minor; Walter W. Teel, Defendants-Appellants. No. 07-60748. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. December 11, 2009. *335 Elizabeth D. Collery (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Crim. Div., Washington, DC, David Harrison Fulcher

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Darryl Nieves (A-26/27-23) (088683) Argued October 21, 2024 -- Decided November 20, 2025 JUSTICE PIERRE-LOUIS, writing for the Court. In this appeal, the Court considers wheth