Cases

236 F.Supp.2d 79 (2002) Paul G. BAMBERG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG COWEN Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SG Cowen Defendant. Janet Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KPMG Singapore Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-CV-10304-PB No. CIV.A.02-CV-10367-PB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 9, 2002.

OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Appellants are current arid former high ranking officials of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, including a former Attorney General who subsequently became Governor.

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Appellant Dr. Karen Malleus appeals the final order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granting Dr. John J. George, Dr. Jill M. Hackman, and Dr. Jeffrey A. Conrad’s motion to disftiiss Malleus’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that they violated her Fourteenth Amendment privacy rig

206 F.Supp.2d 702 (2002) INTERVEST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. S.G. COWEN SECURITIES CORP., Defendant. Nos. 98-CV-3278, 99-CV-5463. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 19, 2002. *703 *704 Michael K. Coran, Ira A. Rosenau, Klehr, Harrison Harvey Branzburg & Ell

OPINION OF THE COURT David B. Saxe, J. This action involves a claim by an insurer regarding its alleged right to a damaged Andy Warhol painting as "salvage”. The painting was owned by the defendants, who obtained insurance on the painting from the plaintiff in 1982, in the amount of $35,000. In December 1982, the painting was damaged while in transit. The defendants obtained an expert’s assessment of t

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: In this civil rights action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, the plaintiff seeks money damages for the manner in which he was treated by law enforcement officers when they arrested him for attempted murder, armed robbery, and carjacking, and hospitalized him for the injuries he sustained while committing these crimes. The district court, on summary judgme

ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge. Daniel Duane, a prisoner at Menard Correctional Center in Illinois, sued four officials of the Illinois Department of Corrections under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that their “deliberate indifference” to his safety amounted to “cruel and unusual punishment.” Finding no genuine issues of material fact, the district court awarded summary judgment in fav

OPINION OF THE COURT STAPLETON, Circuit Judge: We are asked in this habeas corpus proceeding to consider the constitutionality of New Jersey’s so-called “diminished capacity” statute, N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2C:4-2, which requires that the defendant bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence the existence of a mental disease or defect “which woul

556 F.3d 786 (2009) Charles T. MADDEN; Shashidhar Acharya, M.D.; Achauer Family Limited Partnership, a limited partnership; Angela Allevato, M.D.; Robert A. Baird, M.D.; Annette C. Bernhut-Caplin, D.O.; Thomas W. Broderick, M.D.; Nancy K. Brownell, M.D.; Dawn Lynn Bruner, M.D.; Robert Budman, M.D.; Robert William Buster, M.D.; Michael W. Cater, M.D.; Anna Lisa Chavez, M.D.; Janak R. Chopra, M.D.; Raman Chopra, M.D.; Gaston Cilliani, M.D.; Carmelita R. Co

576 F.3d 957 (2009) Charles T. MADDEN; Shashidhar Acharya, M.D.; Achauer Family Limited Partnership, a limited partnership; Angela Allevato, M.D.; Robert A. Baird, M.D.; Annette C. Bernhut-Caplin, D.O.; Thomas W. Broderick, M.D.; Nancy K. Brownell, M.D.; Dawn Lynn Bruner, M.D.; Robert Budman, M.D.; Robert William Buster, M.D.; Michael W. Cater, M.D.; Anna Lisa Chavez, M.D.; Janak R. Chopra, M.D.; Raman Chopra, M.D.; Gaston Cilliani, M.D.; Carmelita R. Co

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHARLES T. MADDEN; SHASHIDHAR  ACHARYA, M.D.; ACHAUER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership; ANGELA ALLEVATO, M.D.; ROBERT A. BAIRD, M.D.; ANNETTE C. BERNHUT-CAPLIN, D.O.; THOMAS W. BRODERICK, M.D.; NANCY K. BROWNELL, M.D.; DAWN LYNN BRUNER, M.D.; ROBERT BUDMAN, M.D.; ROBERT WILLIAM BUSTER, M.D.; MICHAEL W. CATER, M.D.; ANNA LISA No.07-15900 CHAVEZ, M.D.; JANAK R. CHOPRA,

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the admissibility in a criminal trial of statements and conversations recorded by a witness wearing a concealed body recorder. The central issue is whether the witness’ cooperation was voluntary or coerced. The district court excluded the evidence because it found that the witness’ free will

55 P.3d 1030 (2002) 2002 OK 34 BITUMINOUS CASUALTY CORP., Plaintiff, v. COWEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., and Hospital Casualty Company, Defendants. No. 95,971. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 30, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 10, 2002. Robert N. Naifeh, Jr. of Derryberry, Quigley, Solomon, Blankenship & Naifeh, Oklahoma City

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Fazio, et al. v. Nos. 02-3820/3821/3822/3823/ ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0284P (6th Cir.) Lehman Bros., 3824/3825/3826/3867/3868/3869/ File Name: 03a0284p.06 et al. 3870/3873/3874; 03-3041/3042/ 3043/3045/3112/3113/

WINTER, Chief Judge: SG Cowen Securities Corporation (“Cowen”) appeals from Judge Baer’s partial denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction in aid of arbitration. Appellant contends that the state law provision under which the injunction was sought, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 7502(c), does not permit the issuing judge to consider traditional equitable standards for preliminary injuncti

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT June 2, 2011 No. 10-3539 Dr. Karen Malleus, Appellant v. Dr. John J. George, et al. (E.D. Pa. No. 10-cv-01357) Present: FISHER, JORDAN and COWEN, Circuit Judges 1. Moti

SYKES, Circuit Judge. When a plaintiff files a complaint on behalf of a proposed class, the statute of limitations for the claim is tolled for each member of the class. Am. Pipe & Constr. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 550, 94 S.Ct. 756, 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974). The tolling continues until the case is “stripped of its character as a class actio

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______ No. 10-3539 ______ DR. KAREN MALLEUS, Appellant v. DR. JOHN J. GEORGE, in his individual capacity; DR. JILL M. HACKMAN, in he

OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from post-judgment orders in a diversity action governed by New Jersey law. Plaintiffs Jerry and Connie Keith prevailed before a jury which found that negligence on the part of defendant, Truck-stops of America, caused injury to Jerry Keith. The orders denied defendant’s motion for a judgment notw

*971 OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Circuit Judge. In this zoning dispute, we again address ripeness in the context of a constitutional challenge to a land-use decision. See Taylor Inv., Ltd. v. Upper Darby Tp., 983 F.2d 1285 (3d Cir.1993). Because we find the