Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1317 ___________ Luciano Hernandez-Moran, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order of v. * the Board of Immigration A

DE MUNIZ, S. J. Plaintiff prevailed on a claim under the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (RLTA), ORS 90.100-ORS 90.875, and sought an award of attorney fees. ORS 90.255. The trial court denied attorney fees on the ground that plaintiffs counsel had not sufficiently apportioned his fees between plaintiffs fee-bearing claim and those claims for which attorney fees were not authorized. We conclude that the trial court erred i

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [doc. nos. 145, 146, 147, 151, 152, 153, 184, 185, 197, 201] M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge. Currently pending are the individual defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The motions are fully briefed and are considered without oral argument. I. Background On March 23, 2012, Plaintiffs, the Estate of Anastacio Hernand

CONCURRING OPINION RICHARDSON, J., filed a concurring opinion in which KELLER, P.J., and JOHNSON and HERVEY, J.J., joined. I concur in the Court’s analysis of the issue presented for our review and therefore join in the’ majority’s opinion affirming the judgment of the court of appeals. I write separately only to highlight what I perceive to be errors in the jury charge that

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether we have jurisdiction to consider a due process claim that the petitioners did not present to the Immigration and Naturalization Service or to the Board of Immigration Appeals. I Baltazar Hernandez Barron and Margarita Hernandez Ramirez (“the petition

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 9, 2017 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

OPINION JOHNSON, J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court. A jury convicted appellant of fraudulent possession of identifying information, found two enhancement paragraphs in the indictment to be true, and assessed appellant’s punishment at 50 years’ incarceration. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal, but

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 404 Fed. Appx. 387.

DE MUNIZ, S. J. Defendant was convicted of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160; strangulation, ORS 163.187; and interference with making a report, ORS 165.572.1 We reject without discussion defendant’s assignments of error that the trial court erred by empaneling and accepting a verdict by a jury of six people. State v. Sagdal, 258 Or App 890, 311 P3d 941 (2013), aff'd, 356 Or 639

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 633 F.3d 370.

295 S.W.3d 564 (2009) Christine HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. No. ED 92154. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. August 11, 2009. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied September 29, 2009. Application for Transfer Denied November 1

Duarte, J. *134Plaintiffs are class representatives of current and former employees of defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company who install and repair video and internet services in customers' homes. They appeal a judgment in favor of defendant following cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication. Plaintiffs sought compensation

Order Denying Defendant Lisa Brochu’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 46] Jennifer A. Dorsey, United States District Judge Minor plaintiffs J.M.M. and I.M. sue Clark County, a handful of Clark County *1128Department of Family Services (DFS) employees, and their former foster parents Andrea and Waldo Hernandez for injuries the boys allegedly su

BRISCOE, Chief Judge. Defendants Mark Rosalez, Juan Ruelas, and Justin Hernandez, all of whom were federal inmates at the time of the underlying crimes, were jointly tried and convicted by a jury of conspiracy to assault anoth *1199 er inmate, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and murder in the se

PER CURIAM: I. Jesus Hernandez appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm. II. Hernandez was found guilty by a jury of violating various federal narcotics and firearms statutes. He w

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John Manuel Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counse

OPINION MELLOY, Circuit Judge: Rosa Hernandez-Castro appeals her sentence of 46 months after pleading guilty to Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Heroin. Hernandez-Castro argues the district court erred by imposing a two-level downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1 (fast track), instead of the four-level departure set forth in her Fed

MEMORANDUM ** Joel Hernandez-Hernandez and his wife, Jacinta Cortes-Sernas, natives and *119citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider the BIA’s decision denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings based on new evidence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C

OPINION BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice. Damien Hernandez Cortez was convicted of fraudulently possessing five or more but less than ten items of identifying information. In seeking to overturn that conviction, he contends 1) the trial court erred in failing to include a jury instruction on a presumed fact, 2) the trial court erred in failing to include a jury