Cases

MEMORANDUM ** John Jeffrey Reiner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Reiner contends that the district court erred in dismissing his § 2254 petition based on its finding that he was no longer “in custody.” We disagree. It is a statutory jurisdictional prerequisite that

898 A.2d 193 (2006) 95 Conn.App. 294 Sandra A. DIXON v. BROMSON AND REINER. No. 26338. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued February 22, 2006. Decided May 9, 2006. *194 Robert A. Serafinowicz, with whom was John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff). Ralph W. Johns

Cook, J., dissenting. In State v. Reiner (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 342, 731 N.E.2d 662 (“Reiner /”), a majority of this court reversed Reiner’s conviction based on a belief that the trial court should not have granted transactional immunity to Susan Batt in order to compel her testimony. Id. at 352-356, 731 N.E.2d at 673-676. Because Batt had consistently denied culpability for Alex Reiner’s death, the

Cook, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I. Aliunde Evidence/Juror Misconduct The majority’s syllabus suggests that an alternate juror’s testimony can never be sufficient “outside evidence” under Evid.R. 606(B) to permit jurors to testify regarding extraneous prejudicial information. Like Chief Justice Moyer, I am not convinced tha

623 N.E.2d 916 (1993) 251 Ill. App.3d 1065 191 Ill.Dec. 326 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Delbert REINER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-93-0086. Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District. November 12, 1993. Verlin R. Meinz, Office of the State Appellate Defender, Ottawa, for Delbert Reiner.

OPINION BOUCHARD, C. In 2015, Section 115 was added to the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) codifying this Court’s decision in Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp. 1 that Delaware corporations may adopt bylaws requiring that int

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which denied the motion of defendant Hunts Point Live Poultry and Slaughterhouse, Inc. to *478vacate its default and for leave to serve its proposed verified answer, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The complaint, which was verified by counsel, was “purely

Sunyoung Jung v Reiner & Kaiser Assoc. (2023 NY Slip Op 04961) Sunyoung Jung v Reiner & Kaiser Assoc. 2023 NY Slip Op 04961 Decided on October 4, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B

187 N.J. Super. 51 (1982) 453 A.2d 570 JOHN REINER & CO., INC., PLAINTIFF, v. DORSEY ROOFING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Hudson County. Decided October 25, 1982. *52 Barry L. Eisenberg, attorney for plaintiff (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskan, attorneys

This case arises from a routine real estate closing on September 12, 1980, at the law offices of Kelley Keller Co., L.P.A., a legal professional association consisting of two shareholder-attorneys, Joseph P. Kelley and Mark D. Keller. At that closing, Joseph P. Kelley, on behalf of the L.P.A., was acting as the seller's attorney, while plaintiffs, Donald W. Kelley and Lois J. Reiner, were acting as the seller's real estate brokers. One of the closing statements prepared by plaintiffs

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered September 26, 2011, which denied the motion of defendant Hunts Point Live Poultry and Slaughterhouse, Inc. to *478vacate its default and for leave to serve its proposed verified answer, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The complaint, which was verified by counsel, was “purely

602 F.Supp. 849 (1985) John P. REINER, as Executor of the Estate of Paul Reiner, deceased, and Lincoln Orens, Plaintiffs, v. Edith DURAND, individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Marie Elbogen-Lockett, deceased, Defendant. John P. REINER, as Executor of the Estate of Paul Reiner, deceased and Lincoln Orens, Plaintiffs, v. Edith DURAND and Emmy Molles, individually and as Executrices of the Estate of Jan Hans Elbogen, deceased,

677 N.W.2d 117 (2004) 267 Neb. 696 In re WENDLAND-REINER TRUST. John M. McHenry, Successor Trustee, appellee, v. Rosella L. Reiner, appellee, and John R. Wendland, appellant. No. S-02-1395. Supreme Court of Nebraska. April 2, 2004. *118 Patrick D. Timmer, of Pierson, Fitchett, Hunzeker, Blake &

117 Ill. App.2d 141 (1969) 254 N.E.2d 66 Henry Neurauter, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John Reiner, John J. Reiner, a Minor, Edward A. Reiner, a Minor, Joseph Reiner, a Minor, Richard Reiner, a Minor, Anne Reiner, a Minor, Mary Reiner, a Minor, Adelaide Reiner, a Minor, and Barbara Reiner, a Minor, Defendants-Appellees. Gen. No. 52,480. Illinois Appellate Court — First Dist

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 782 (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 419 BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER & WOLPERT et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent, John J. Reiner et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. B162059. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. February 19, 2003. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing March 17, 200

CHIEF JUSTICE McGRATH delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 John C. Foster (Foster) appeals from the April 1, 2016 District Court denial of his motion to suppress all evidence and motion to dismiss. We affirm. ¶2 We restate the issue on appeal as follows:

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 342.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. REINER, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Reiner, 2000-Ohio-190.] Evidence—Prohibitions in Evid.R. 606(B) against receiving evidence from a juror apply to alternate jurors—Evidence received from alternate juror, without other outside evidence, is insufficient aliunde evidence

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 601.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. REINER, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Reiner, 2001-Ohio-1800.] Criminal law—Witnesses—Immunity erroneously granted, when—Application of Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. (Nos. 99-239 and 99-427—Submitted October 2, 2001—Decided November 28,

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 23–0005 Submitted November 13, 2024—Filed December 13, 2024 John Feller, Appellant, vs. State of Iowa, Appellee. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuqu

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered July 30, 1996, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment declaring a clause in defendant partnership’s by-laws to be anticompetitive and awarded plaintiff Reiner the amount of his capital account, unanimously affirmed, without costs. The clause in issue is not anticompetitive in providing that a withdrawing partner is entitled to 10% of the amount that would