Cases

710 F.Supp.2d 1378 (2010) IN RE: AT & T MOBILITY WIRLESS DATA SERVICES SALES TAX LITIGATION. No. MDL 2147. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. April 7, 2010. *1379 Before JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman, ROBERT L. MILLER, JR.[*], KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN, W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., FRANK C. DAMREL

[J-6-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, JJ. RONALD SCOTT HANGEY AND : No. 14 EAP 2022 ROSEMARY HANGEY H/W, : : Appeal from the Judgment of Appellees : Superior Court entered on March 8,

*338 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge: Fifty-seven Plaintiffs and Defendant, AT & T Mobility LLC (“AT & T”), have filed a joint motion (“Motion”) in this multidistrict litigation for (1) certification of a settlement class, (2) preliminary approval of settlement, (3) approval of a proposed class-s

Henninger, P. J., — Plaintiff seeks an accounting from defendants on an agreement whereby for architectural service he was to receive *208one fourth of the profits from defendants’ home building enterprises in Emmaus and Allentown. This action in equity was brought after John A. Robbins, almost sole stockholder in all defendant corporations, ceased to m

Henninger, P. J., Plaintiff, a resident of Northampton County, insured by defendant against liability for damage done by plaintiff’s automobile was forced to settle an action against him in the Lehigh County courts when defendant’s counsel withdrew as his counsel in that action. He is now suing defendant in our court to recover $750, the amount expended by him in settlement and $350 the amount incurred by him a