Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Hobbing”
United States v. John Oscar Reivespublic domain
OPINION K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge: Reives appeals his conviction of conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He raises the single issue of whether it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to clarify the term “reasonable doubt” when requested to do so by the jury. We find no error, and we affirm.
994 S.W.2d 285 (1999) The JOHN G. AND STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION and Corpus Christi Diocese of the Roman Catholic Church, Appellants, v. David DEWHURST, Commissioner of the General Land Office and State of Texas, Appellees. No. 03-96-00517-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. May 27, 1999. *289 Paul W. Nye, Chaves, Gonza
Generation Capital I, LLC v. John Flisspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1424 IN RE: JOHN FLISS, Debtor-Appellee, v. GENERATION CAPITAL I, LLC, Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Generation Capital I, LLC v. John Flisspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1424 IN RE: JOHN FLISS, Debtor-Appellee, v. GENERATION CAPITAL I, LLC, Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Generation Capital I, LLC v. John Flisspublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1424 IN RE: JOHN FLISS, Debtor-Appellee, v. GENERATION CAPITAL I, LLC, Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
United States v. John Bazzanopublic domain
712 F.2d 826 UNITED STATES of Americav.John BAZZANO, Jr. a/k/a "Johnny", a/k/a "J", Joseph De Marcoa/k/a "Joe", Joseph Charles Yimin a/k/a "Bull", CharlesPatrick Kellington a/k/a "Chuck", Francis Dattalo a/k/a"Frank", a/k/a "Hob", Attilio Policastro a/k/a "Flat Top",Primo Victor Mollica a/k/a "XG", John Franklin Matz a/k/a"Jack", a/k/a "Mayor", David Rankin Guffey a/k/a "Chief",a/k/a "Clairton Chief", John Regis Ward
United States v. Sinclairpublic domain
*232 AMENDED OPINION PER CURIAM: Louie George Sinclair pled guilty to wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2000), and was sentenced to eighteen months in prison. Sinclair appeals. His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising one issue but stating that there ar
Finkley v. John Raffa Lathingpublic domain
THORNAL, Justice. Petitioner Finkley, an employee, seeks review of an order of the Florida Industrial Commission affirming an order of a deputy commissioner which fixed the extent of petitioner’s permanent partial disability. We must determine whether the full commission departed from the essential requirements of the law by virtue of the matters hereafter set out. As a result of an indust
Eckstein v. Cincinnati Insurancepublic domain
469 F.Supp.2d 455 (2007) John P. ECKSTEIN and Loree Eckstein, Plaintiffs v. CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY and Great Northern Insurance Company, a subsidiary of the Chubb Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:05CV-043-M. United States District. Court, W.D. Kentucky, Paducah Division. January 10, 2007. *456
BOGGS, Chief Judge. This case presents the questions of whether an ERISA plan’s determination to deny benefits was arbitrary and capricious and, if it was, what remedy this court should order. Patricia Elliott submitted a claim for long-term disability benefits to the administrator of her employer’s employee benefit plan, Metropolitan Life (“MetLife”). MetLife denied Elliott’s c
United States v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurancepublic domain
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Kansas. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Howard v. Sterchipublic domain
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge: In this case plaintiffs sought damages and injunctive relief for copyright infringement, unfair trade practices, unfair competition, and breach of contract. Plaintiffs achieved partial success when the district court entered a judgment on the breach of contract claims for monetary damages and for injunctive relief, but other claims were denied. Plaintiffs appeal arguing that the district court
Hob Nobbers, Inc. v. Demetreepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT JAMES C. HAUSER, County Judge. Plaintiff is a non-residential tenant of the Defendant. The air conditioner malfunctioned and Plaintiff sued Defendant for the cost of repairing it. The written lease failed to mention whether the tenant or landlord would be responsible for making air conditioner repairs. The court ruled that in a non-residential tenancy, unless the lease states otherwis
Dixon v. Cowlespublic domain
VANCE, Judge: This case requires an interpretation of certain sections of the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act, KRS 304.39-010 — 304.39-340. The facts are not in dispute. The issue is whether one who is a passenger in an uninsured automobile, but who does not own, operate or maintain a motor vehicle in this state, is barred by KRS 304.39-060 from asserting tort liability for injuries received in an automobile accident. The trial
Siegmann v. Buffingtonpublic domain
JUSTICE SLATER delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff John Siegmann, by his father and next friend, Alan Siegmann, filed this personal injury action seeking damages for injuries he sustained during an altercation at Putnam County high school. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants Joe Massino and Putnam County Community School District No. 535.
Phillips v. Lithia Motors, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ** Lithia Motors, Inc., Lithia Support Services, Inc., and certain officers and employees of Lithia Motors, Inc. (collectively Lithia Appellants) appeal the district court’s denial of Lithia Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. The district court properly denied Lithia Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration because Lithia Appellants waived their right to compel arbitra
Phillips v. Lithia Motors, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM ** Lithia Motors, Inc., Lithia Support Services, Inc., and certain officers and employees of Lithia Motors, Inc. (collectively Lithia Appellants) appeal the district court’s denial of Lithia Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration. The district court properly denied Lithia Appellants’ motion to compel arbitration because Lithia Appellants waived their right to compel arbitra
Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Martinezpublic domain
JOHNSTONE, Justice, dissenting. After concluding that the exclusion at issue in this case does not require a criminal conviction before it becomes applicable, the majority opinion rather perfunctorily states, “the circuit court properly deter*146mined that Louisville Crematory and Cemeteries, Inc. intentionally acted in a manner that resulted in injury.
Power Petroleums, Inc. v. P & G Mining Co.public domain
682 F.Supp. 492 (1988) POWER PETROLEUMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. P & G MINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. 87-C-286. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 29, 1988. John C. Siegesmund, III, Harry L. Hobson, Mark Semenoff, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff. Jeffrey A. Chase, Boyd N. Boland, Thomas H. McCarthy, Jr., Holme Roberts & Owens, Denv
Frederick v. Lewispublic domain
JUSTICE LUND delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff Eugene Mark Frederick appeals from an order of the circuit court of Ford County which ordered partition of 240 acres of land but denied Frederick’s request that a lien for Federal estate tax, resulting from the death of Hazel L. Martin, attach to the various interests in the 240 acres. He also appeals from orders in c