Cases

Greaney, J. This is a complaint for instructions by the trustees under the will of Thomas E. Proctor, Jr. (Thomas, Jr.), as to the distribution of the principal of three, trusts created by the will. A judge in the Probate and Family Court appointed guardians ad litem to represent minors and unascertained and unborn issue, and, following argument, entered an amended judgment directing distribution of two of the trusts and reformi

358 S.C. 424 (2004) 595 S.E.2d 480 The STATE, Petitioner, v. Duncan PROCTOR, Respondent. No. 25810. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard December 4, 2003. Decided April 19, 2004. *426 Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy

Justice PLEICONES: We granted certiorari to review a Court of Appeals’ decision remanding respondent’s appeal to the circuit court with instructions to hold a hearing and determine whether informa*420tion not disclosed by the State was material to the defense. State v. Proctor, 347 S.C. 587, 556 S.E.2d 418 (Ct.App.2001). Because we hold there is no reasonable

584 F.3d 1208 (2009) Rebecca PROCTOR; Rex Brooks; John Donovan; Robert Needles on behalf of Siliconix, Inc. themselves and on behalf of all minority shareholders of Siliconix, Inc., similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC.; Vishay Temic Semiconductor Acquisition Holdings Corporation; Siliconix, Inc.; Ernst & Young LLP; Felix D. Zandman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-16527. <

990 A.2d 1048 (2010) 412 Md. 691 Sylvester L. PROCTOR, et ux. v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Misc. No. 1 September Term, 2009. Court of Appeals of Maryland. March 12, 2010. *1051 Andrew H. Baida (Caroline L. Hecker of Rosenberg, Martin, Greenberg, LLP, Baltimore, MD; John B. Low of Law

MCKEIG, Justice. *217Midway Township and the City of Duluth entered into an orderly annexation agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 414.0325 (2018) regarding certain designated property in Midway and governing future an

585 N.W.2d 841 (1998) STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Jerry Lee PROCTOR, Appellant. No. 97-296. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 23, 1998. Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender, Kevin Cmelik and John Messina, Assistant State Appellate Defenders, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Julie H. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, Cou

232 F.Supp.2d 472 (2002) Gilbert Don PROCTOR, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. NORTH SHORE PARTNERS, INC., Development Consultants, Inc., and Parallel Construction Corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. No. CIV.A.1999/032. District Court, Virgin Islands, Appellate Division, D. St. Croix. Considered: September 28, 2001. Filed: September 23, 2002.

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CF-0349 GARY N. PROCTOR, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES,

685 A.2d 735 (1996) Marshall PROCTOR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 93-CF-739. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 19, 1996. Decided November 7, 1996. Richard Greenlee, Washington, DC, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Gretchen Franklin, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, for appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-305 Filed 3 December 2024 Onslow County, No. 22CVS3264 Anthony L. Proctor, Sr.; Nicole Gonzalez; Octavius Raymond; The Spot Florida Style Seafood, LLC; The Cheesesteak Hustle LLC; and Noah and Isidore, L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. City of Jacksonville, et al., Defendants. Appeal by Plaintiffs from order entered 2 January 2024 by Judge John E.

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is ORDERED .by the merits division*, that the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted in part, and this court’s March 16, 2017,***opinion is amended by revising the last sentence on pages 403-04, with accompan

947 F.Supp. 1551 (1996) The PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Proctor & Gamble Distributing Company, Plaintiffs, v. Randy L. HAUGEN, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 1:95-CV-0094W. United States District Court, D. Utah, Northern Division. December 3, 1996. *1552 Tracy H. Fowler, William H. Christensen, Sean N. Egan, Campbell,

654 F.3d 210 (2011) JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Supap KIRTSAENG, doing business as Bluechristine99, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 09-4896-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 19, 2010. Decided: August 15, 2011. *211 William Dunnegan (Laura Scileppi, on the brie

OPINION OF THE COURT UPON FURTHER REVIEW HODGSON, Senior Judge: Staff Sergeant Proctor was convicted by a military judge sitting alone of multiple allegations of indecent acts and assault on children under 16 years of age. The approved sentence consists of a dishonorable discharge, 30 years confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to E-l. The paramount issue before us is the appel

PER CURIAM: This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, which reversed our prior decision by holding that the “first sale” doctrine, see 17 U.S.C. § 109(a), provides a defense against a copyright infringement claim based on unauthorized resale “where, as here, copies are manufactured abroad with the permission of the copyr

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is ORDERED .by the merits division*, that the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted in part, and this court’s March 16, 2017,***opinion is amended by revising the last sentence on pages 403-04, with accompan

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-CF-309 JEROME PROCTOR, JR., APPELLANT, v. UNITED STAT

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is ORDERED .by the merits division*, that the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted in part, and this court’s March 16, 2017,***opinion is amended by revising the last sentence on pages 403-04, with accompan

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of the appellee’s petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant’s opposition thereto, it is ORDERED .by the merits division*, that the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted in part, and this court’s March 16, 2017,***opinion is amended by revising the last sentence on pages 403-04, with accompan