Cases

599 F.Supp.2d 34 (2009) William F. PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CV-08-4-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 19, 2009. *36 Benjamin R. Gideon, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiff. David R. Collins, Evan J. Roth, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Ma

Cordy, J. In 1995, Terry L. Patterson was convicted of the murder of a Boston police detective.1 His conviction was based in large part on the expert testimony of a member of the Boston police latent fingerprint section, who used the most common method of latent fingerprint identification, ACE-V,2 to determine that four latent impressions found on the victim’s vehicle wer

Filed 3/17/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN PETER PAUL REGINA, B316404 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 21STCV09546) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. AP

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

308 F.3d 1233 Donald O'CONNOR, et al., Plaintiffs, andBenjamin M. Aban, Donald N. Adaniya, Rolando R. Alvarado, Joseph A. Alvitre, Larry Andrews, Jeannett Armstrong, Robert G. Ashmore, Lee E. Austin, David K. Bahl, Lawrence R. Barron, Kenneth R. Battle, Jeanette Binion, Royce Binion, Eleanor M. Bishop, Gaetane M. Boutin, Thomas R. Boyden, Deena J. Bradshaw, Shadrach Breaux, Stephen G. Broich, Michael C. Brown, Yulanda S. Brown, David S. Buchana

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Like many people trying to catch a plane around the holidays, Regina Kay Garrett was in a hurry. Unlike most, she forgot that she had a gun in her purse, or so she says. The principal question we decide today is whether the federal statute that criminalizes this conduct requires any degree of mens rea as an element of the offense. We

145 F.3d 1180 98 CJ C.A.R. 2751 Jack DALRYMPLE; Rosemary Dalrymple; David A. Adams; R.D."Buddy" Adams; Kenneth Bales; Patricia Bales; Gerald L.Baser; Bettie L. Baser; Larry J. Becker; Robert K. Berry;Susan M. Berry; Mark E. Blankenship; Board ofCommissioners of Ottawa County, Oklahoma; Charles Bowling;Kathy Bowling; Calvin Brady; Chet Brewington and SusanBrewington, d/b/a Thunderbir

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-01183-SCT TUNICA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI v. TOWN OF TUNICA, MISSISSIPPI, TUNICA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL AND STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/24/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. HENRY L. LACKEY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: ELLIS TURNAGE J. CHADWICK MASK REGINA R. QUINN

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: On this appeal, we consider challenges to an award of summary judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Forrest, /.), which forfeited to the United States various claimants’ interests in multiple properties, including a 36-story office building located at 650 Fifth Avenue in Manhattan (“the Building”), real properties in Maryland, Texas, California, Virgini

99 Wn.2d 193 (1983) 660 P.2d 271 In the Matter of the Stay of Proceedings Against Defendants JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, ET AL. Nos. 48986-6, 48987-4, 48993-9. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. March 17, 1983. Ted R. Willhite, William S. Bailey, Harold F. Vhugen, Levinson, Friedman, Vhugen, Duggan, Bland & Horowitz, Paul W. Whelan

OPINION {¶ 1} In these consolidated appeals, Robert Penn; John R. Hubbard; Marilyn Roth, individually, and as executor of the estate of James H. Roth, deceased; William A. Siegel; Mack Price; Herschel Ward; Robert L. Williams; and Edward Harrison, plaintiffs-appellants, appeal from judgments of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in *Page 4 which the court, in eight separate ju

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In 1998, the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida held a trial—Phase I of the Engle class action—to determine whether the largest domestic tobacco companies (the- “Engle defendants”) engaged *1192in conduct proscribed by Florida tort law.1

146 B.R. 757 (1992) In re Leonard E. TEMPLETON, Jr., and Larrilee H. Templeton, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 92 B 04870. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. October 15, 1992. Allan S. Brilliant, Holleb & Coff, Chicago, Ill., for Leonard E. Templeton, Jr. and Larrilee H. Templeton, debtors. C. John Ruddy, Truemper, Hollingsworth, Wojtecki Courtin &

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: (1) GRANTING THE DEBTOR’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO MISSOURI; AND (2) DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO CALIFORNIA [Adv. Doc. Nos. 12, 15, & 29] Jeff Bohm, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction On November 23, 2016, a lawsuit styled Ervin Walker, et al v. Directory Distributing Associates, Inc., et al., Cause No. 2

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In New Jersey, we adhere to the general proposition that a defendant who has the mental capacity to know basic societal mores that distinguish objectively between right and wrong is legally responsible for his criminal conduct. See State v. Sikora, 44 N.J. 453, 470, 210 A.2d 193 (1965). Mental illness does not in and of itself eliminate mora

504 S.E.2d 802 (1998) Anna Mae SHERRILL, Annetta C. White, Linda S. Mintz, Vernette Price, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION a/k/a Amerada Petroleum Corporation; Amoco Oil Company; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; Citgo Petroleum Corporation; Colonial Pipe Line Company; Conoco, Inc. a/k/a Southern Facilities; Crown Central Petroleum Corporation; Exxon Corporation; Marathon Oil Compa

14‐2027 In re 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

OBERDORFER, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I am pleased to join in Parts III.C.2 and III.C.S of Judge Sullivan’s opinion. I agree that Georgia has met its burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed Congressional and state House redistricting plans have neither a retrogressive purpose nor effect. However, with respect to t

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV