Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-2185 REGINALD CLAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the N

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25b0002p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: JOHN PRESTON THOMPSON, │ Debtor. │ ___________________________________________ │ TEENA COL

ACCEPTED 15-24-00128-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/16/2024 12:00 AM No. 15-24-00128-CV

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), filed September 29, 2017 (Doc. 19)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on June 4, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whe

ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM

ACCEPTED 03-15-00305-CV 5651450 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1019 JOYCE MCKIVER; DELOIS LEWIS; DAPHNE MCKOY; ALEXANDRIA MCKOY; ANTONIO KEVIN MCKOY; ARCHIE WRIGHT, JR.; TAMMY LLOYD; DEBORAH JOHNSON; ETHEL DAVIS; PRISCILLA DUNHAM, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and DENNIS MCKIVER, JR.; LAJUNE JESSUP; DON LLOY

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER J. RONNIE GREER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiffs for class certification, [Docs. 201, 202]. The defendants have responded in opposition, [Doc. 228], and plaintiffs have replied, [Doc. 295]. Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum in support of the motion for class certification, [Doc. 669], and defendants responded to th

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Michael H. Simon, United States-District Judge This case involves a dispute over a lessee’s obligations upon the expiration of two leases—negotiated with two separate landlords for two cónjoinéd buildings—that have spanned more than 50 years. Plaintiff RoSs -Dress For Less, Inc. (“Ross” or “Plaintiff’) is the successor in interest to the original lessee. Defendan

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 2:31 PM

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’, BMW of North America LLC (“BMW NA”) and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (“BMW AG”) (collectively “Defendants”), Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’, Great Northern Insurance Company and Pacific Indemnity Insurance (collectively “Plaintiffs”), claims for: (1) breach of implied warranty a

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 10, 2013 Decided April 15, 2014 No. 12-1100 WHITE STALLION ENERGY CENTER, LLC, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consolidated with 12-1101, 12-1102, 12-1147, 12-1172, 1

MEMORANDUM OPINION WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge. Aphena Pharma Solutions-Maryland LLC (“Aphena”) sued BioZone Laboratories, Inc. (“BioZone”), BioZone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BioZone Pharmaceuticals”), and Daniel Fisher (collectively “defendants”) for contract and fraud claims. Pending are Fisher’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and the defendants’ motion to transfer the case t

AMENDED ORDER AND OPINION RESOLVING INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO UNSEAL DOCUMENTS ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: An intervenor, The New York Times Company (the “Times”) moves to unseal, and thereby make public, the motion filed to approve a settlement of all but three of the property damage cases in the 21 MC 101 master calendar. The settling plaintiffs 1 and defendan

NOTICE 2025 IL App (5th) 231205 Decision filed 12/11/25. The text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-1205, 5-23-1213 cons. changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ____________________________________________

32 F.Supp.2d 1361 (1998) AGRICREDIT ACCEPTANCE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Thomas Gary HENDRIX, Hohenberg Bros. Co., Loeb & Company, Inc., Weil Brothers-Cotton, Inc., The Montgomery Company, Inc., Collins Bonded Warehouse, Inc., Candler Gin & Warehouse, Inc., Goldkist, Inc. d/b/a Goldkist Cotton Warehouse, Growers Gin and Warehouse, Inc., Savannah River Cotton Co., Inc., and Cottage Hill Trading Co., Inc., Defendants. No. CV

OPINION Opinion by: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice On August 19, 2015, this court issued an opinion and judgment in this appeal. Acting sua sponte, we withdraw our opinion and judgment of August 19, 2015, and substitute this opinion and judgment to clarify portions of the opinion. See Tex. R. App

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV