Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “John Frank Slowik”
Doe v. Carreiropublic domain
Opinion GRUENDEL, J. The defendant, Frank E. Carreiro, Sr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered *628after a trial to the court, awarding the two minor plaintiffs, John Doe and Tom Doe,1 damages for his sexual abuse of them and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. On appeal, the def
F. L. Walz, Inc. v. Hobart Corp.public domain
157 Ill. App.3d 334 (1987) 510 N.E.2d 1248 F.L. WALZ, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOBART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 3-86-0504. Illinois Appellate Court Third District. Opinion filed July 7, 1987. Rehearing denied August 12, 1987. *335 Timothy L. Bertschy, of Heyl, Royster, Vo
SWAN, Circuit Judge. mThis is an appeal from a judgment for . "f, , „ . the plaintiff m the amount of $90,000 in ,. , , , , . , .. an action brought under the Federal Em- , aa Atr c< n a on ployers Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 , , . , . . et seq., tried to a jury. The court denied A j- a j-a , , motions to direct a verdict, and to set ., ,, , , , .’ , „ as
Kimberly B. Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, Inc.public domain
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. Kimberly Ellerth’s lawsuit against Burlington Industries, which claimed that a higher level supervisor sexually harassed her, foundered on the rules for holding a company liable for its supervisory employees’ conduct in this area. Expressing some frustration with the inadequacy of the theoretical framework available, the district court concluded tha
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerthpublic domain
524 U.S. 742 (1998) BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ELLERTH No. 97-569. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 22, 1998. Decided June 26, 1998. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT *743 *744 *745
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Registerpublic domain
Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di
Schoolcraft v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
Opinion SWEET, District Judge. [[Image here]] *474[[Image here]] Plaintiff Adrian Schoolcraft (“School-craft” or “Plaintiff’); Defendants Christopher Broschart, Timothy Caughey, Kurt Duncan, Elise Hanlon, Theodore Lauter-born, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson, Frederick Sawyer, The City Of New York, Timothy
Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of Americapublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority view, set forth in the Court’s per curiam opinion, that the district judge properly dismissed Jansen’s retaliation and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Per Curiam Op. at p. 493. I also agree with the majority that the district judge’s grant of summary judgmen
Bessey v. Salemmepublic domain
Cox, J. These are three actions of tort, which were tried together, arising out of a collision of an automobile operated by Prince M. Bessey, hereinafter referred to as Bessey, with a motor truck operated by the defendant. *191The plaintiff administrator’s intestates, John A. Bessey and Persis M. Bessey, son and wife respectively of Bessey, and the plaintiff Berry were pas
State v. Brownpublic domain
687 P.2d 751 (1984) 297 Or. 404 STATE of Oregon, Respondent On Review, v. Alvin Harold BROWN, Petitioner On Review. SC C81-04-32024; SC A22491; SC S30146. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1984. Decided July 10, 1984. *752 Marc D. Blackman, of Ransom, Blackman
123 F.3d 490 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1138,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,940Alice JANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.Kimberly B. ELLERTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 95-3128, 96-1361. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 15, 199