⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John Fischer”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 55 A.D.2d 759; 866 N.Y.S.2d 264
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Gregory John Fischer as the candidate of the Democratic Farty for the public office of State Senator for the 1st Senatorial District, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J), entered August 19, 2008, which, among other things, denied the petition to validate and dismissed the proceeding. O
State v. Fischerpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024-02-22 · Published · cited 3× · 2024 ND 29
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 22, 2024 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
Fischer v. Hoytpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2022-01-21 · Published · cited 0× · 969 N.W.2d 438; 2022 ND 17
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JANUARY 21, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 58× · 603 U.S. 480
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 48× · 603 U.S. 480
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 480–519 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-04-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–1068 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed April 15, 2022 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Appellee, vs. JOHN KARL FISCHER, Appellant. On appeal from the report of the Iowa Supreme Court Grievance Commission. In an attorney disciplinary action, the grievance commission recommends revocation of the respondent’s license to practice law based on
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0043-07
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1351 CA 10-01574 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN HOGAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. JOHN HOGAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 719 CA 10-00412 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN HOGAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. JOHN HOGAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERA
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017-01-19 · Published · cited 10× · 68 N.E.3d 603; 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 22; 2017 WL 218954
Robb, Judge. Case Summary and Issue Jennifer Fischer filed for dissolution of her marriage to George Fischer on October 30, 2014. The trial court held a final hearing on August 27, 2015, and issued an order dissolving the marriage on November 23, 2015. George appeals the dissolution decree, raising two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 195 So. 3d 1170; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10026; 2016 WL 3540979
DAMOORGIAN, J. Lee Fischer (“Former Husband”) appeals the trial court’s order involuntarily dismissing his action to modify Candice Fischer’s (“Former Wife”) alimony award. We reverse. \ Former Husband filed a two count supplemental petition for modification of alimony alleging the following two substantial changes in circum'stances: (1) Former Husban
Fischer v. Fischerpublic domain
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2011-09-20 · Published · cited 83× · 348 S.W.3d 582; 2011 WL 1087156
348 S.W.3d 582 (2011) Joseph FISCHER; and Cindy Fischer, Appellants, v. John R. FISCHER, Successor Executor of the Estate of John Fischer, Appellee. No. 2009-SC-000245-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. March 24, 2011. As Modified September 20, 2011. Rehearing Denied October 27, 2011. *584 Thomas V.
Reyes v. Fischerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019-08-09 · Published · cited 15× · 934 F.3d 97
John G. Koeltl, District Judge: *100Plaintiff-appellee Ciara Reyes brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that her constitutional right to due process was violated when the defendants required her to serve an ad
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 98 A.D.3d 1067; 950 N.Y.S.2d 708
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate petitions purporting to designate Gregory John Fischer, Roger S. Lewis, and Bill Jurow as candidates in a primary election that was held on September 13, 2012, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as candidates for the public offices of Trustees of the Long Island Power Authority, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Garguilo, J.),
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 98 A.D.3d 1067; 950 N.Y.S.2d 708
In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate petitions purporting to designate Gregory John Fischer, Roger S. Lewis, and Bill Jurow as candidates in a primary election that was held on September 13, 2012, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as candidates for the public offices of Trustees of the Long Island Power Authority, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Garguilo, J.),
Hassell v. Fischerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-01-03 · Published · cited 15× · 879 F.3d 41
JON Ó. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: In 1998, the New York legislature passed a sentencing, reform statute that changed the sentencing scheme for violent felony offenders by eliminating parole and requiring a term of post-release supervision (“PRS”) to follow determinate sentences. See N.Y. Penal Law § 70.45(1); People v. Catu, 4 N.Y.Sd 242, 244, 792 N.Y
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2006-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 31, 2006 Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 31, 2006. In The
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2006-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 31, 2006 Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 31, 2006.
Fischer v. Colvinpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016-07-29 · Published · cited 78× · 831 F.3d 31; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13817; 2016 WL 4056032
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied Gloria Gean Fischer’s claim for disability insurance benefits (DIB) under the Social Security Act. The ALJ concluded that Fischer was not disabled prior to the date on which her insured status expired and thus not eligible to receive benefits. On petition for judicial review, the district court found that the ALJ erred a