Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “John Faustin Kelley”
Bullock v. Waynepublic domain
623 F.Supp.2d 1247 (2009) Rebecca E. BULLOCK, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, v. John D. WAYNE, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Basin Surveying, Inc., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-cv-00339-PAB-KMT. United States District Court, D. Colorado. April 16, 2009. As Amended April 17, 2009. *1250 Kelly R. McCab
Mink v. Sutherspublic domain
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Colorado law makes it “criminal libel” to knowingly publish any statement tending to “impeach the honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation or expose the natural defects of one who is alive, and thereby to expose him to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule.” Colo.Rev.Stat. § 18-13-105. While a student at the University of Northern Colorado (UNC), Thomas Mink cr
Mink v. Sutherspublic domain
482 F.3d 1244 Thomas MINK; The Howling Pig, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John W. SUTHERS, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Kenneth R. Buck, District Attorney for Colorado's 19th Judicial District; Susan Knox, a Chief Deputy District Attorney working for Colorado's 19th Judicial District Attorney's Office, in her individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees,andStudent Press
In Re Enron Corp.public domain
325 B.R. 671 (2005) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., et al., Defendants. Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Mass Mutual Life Insurance Co., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 01 B 16034(AJG), Adversary No. 03-92677 A, Adversary No. 03-92682 A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 15,
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINTS ARTHUR J. GONZALEZ, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue presented is whether payments made by various entities in connection with certain transactions involving short-term commercial paper are “settlement payments” within the context of 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) which would, as a matter of law, preclude the relief sought by the plaintiff in the adversary