Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S AMENDED COMPLAINT TO REVOKE DISCHARGE (DOC. NO. 4) Judge Caldwell This Memorandum Opinion and Order serves as the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law for the United States Trustee’s Amended Complaint to Revoke Discharge (Plaintiff), and the Answer filed by the Debtor, John E. Fonner (Defenda

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: George E. McDermott and Patricia J. McDermott seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of the court’s order remanding the case to the state court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006), “[a]n order remanding a case to the State

Catherine Peek McEwen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge THIS PROCEEDING comes before the Court on the United States Trustee's Complaint Under 11 U.S.C. §§ 110 and 526 - 28 against the Defendants, Kirkland D. Carnegie and Carnegie Tax Service, Inc. The United States Trustee alleges that the Defendants have been pro

79 P.3d 245 (2003) 2003 MT 283 In re the Marriage of Cheryl L. McDERMOTT-YEARGIN, f/k/a Cheryl McDermott, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Bruce C. McDERMOTT, Respondent and Respondent. No. 02-633. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs June 26, 2003. Decided October 9, 2003. Rehearing Denied November 13, 2003.

120 S.W.3d 261 (2003) David L. McDERMOTT, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, et al., Respondents/Respondents. No. ED 82552. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. October 28, 2003. David L. McDermott, Bowling Green, MO, pro se. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The issue for decision is whether the matter is moot, or whether plaintiff has substantiated that the mootness doctrine should not apply because the conduct complained of — which the Government h

Per Curiam. *144 {¶ 1} We affirm the Tenth District Court of Appeals' denial of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by appellant, John P. McDermott. That court correctly held that McDermott is not entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Ohio Adult Parole Authority ("APA"), t

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge, Dissenting: The majority relies on cases in which the party seeking an injunction was attempting to enjoin speech, claiming the result here necessarily follows from cases (1) reviewing a decision forcing a union to cease expressing its views through bannering, Overstreet v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, Local Union No. 1506, 409 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir.2005),

Elizabeth W. Danielson, Judge. Grain Systems Credit Company, a partnership, was awarded a summary judgment in a United States District Court in Illinois against the appellants, John E. McDermott and Ila A. McDermott, for $63,915.51, plus attorneys’ fees and costs for breach of a grain bin lease. The judgment was issued on April 23, 1990, and on July 9, 1990, Grain Systems gave notice to appellant

929 N.E.2d 1167 (2010) Thomas FITCH, Virginia West, Heather Haibt, and Thomas Michael Fitch, as Beneficiaries of the Victoria R. Fitch Trust Dated February 3, 1987, as Amended and Restated October 13, 2004, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. McDERMOTT, WILL AND EMERY, LLP, Dietrich and Dietrich, LLC, Joseph Dietrich, John Dietrich, and Harris Bank, N.A., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-09-0029. Appellate Court of I

858 N.E.2d 563 (2006) 306 Ill.Dec. 563 CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION and PDV Midwest Refining L.L.C., Plaintiffs, v. McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.; J. Ray McDermott, S.A.; J. Ray McDermott, Inc.; McDermott Incorporated; The Babcock and Wilcox Company; The Babcock and Wilcox Company, Tubular Products Division; Alliance Tubular Products Division Formerly Pittsburgh Tube Company; American Midco Pipe and Tube, Inc. a/k/a Midco P

ON APPELLANTS’ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING PETITION FOR CERTIORARI Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER: In order to ensure that the United States Supreme Court has sufficient time to rule on the certiorari petition in this case, the Florida Secretary o

544 Pa. 21 (1996) 674 A.2d 665 J. Bradley McDERMOTT, James T. McDermott, Jr., and Michael J. McDermott, Executors of the Estate of the Honorable James T. McDermott, Deceased, Appellants, v. Daniel R. BIDDLE, Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., and Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc., Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 5, 1995. Decided April

139 B.R. 50 (1992) In re Raymond John McDERMOTT, Debtor. Joan CORDEIRO a/k/a Joan Jenard, Plaintiff, v. Raymond John McDERMOTT, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-11338, Adv. No. 91-1160. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island. March 17, 1992. Daniel E. Chaika, Chaika and Chaika, Cranston, R.I., for debtor. Richard A. Pacia, Pacia & Pacia, Ltd., Pa

82 N.Y.2d 354 (1993) 624 N.E.2d 985 604 N.Y.S.2d 890 Joseph E. McDermott, Individually and as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents, v. Edward V. Regan, as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents, and State of New York, Appellant. Edward W. Guzdek, Individually and as President of the Police Conference of Ne

518 F.Supp.2d 289 (2007) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Paul P. McDERMOTT, Plaintiff, v. GENENTECH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil No. 2:05cv-147. United States District Court, D. Maine. October 22, 2007. Joseph H. Groff, III, Jensen, Baird, Gardner & Henry, Portland, ME, Robert L. King, Law Office of Robert L. King, St. Louis, MI, George A. Zelcs, Korein Til

OPINION OF THE COURT Eugene Schwartzwald, J. The defendants in this case are charged with assaulting the complaining witness, who is allegedly retarded. On February 3, 1993 both defendants were served desk appearance tickets relating to the incident. On March 2, the defendants appeared in court in response to those tickets. This commenced the operation of a 90-day People

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from defendants Space Hunters, Inc. and John McDermott’s (together, “defendants”) alleged dis *419 crimination, based on both race and disability, in the New York City room rental market. The Government brought seven claims for relief against the defenda

938 F.Supp. 240 (1995) Charles W. McDERMOTT, Plaintiff, v. CHILTON COMPANY, part of Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., and Michael Koehler, Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-4971 (MTB). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 30, 1995. *241 John V. McDermott, Jr., Vernon, NJ, for Charles W. McDermott. Christopher H. Mills,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 774 This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas that permitted attorney John Lawrence to assert the attorney-client privilege and refuse to answer questions about conversations between himself and his former client, defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, Jeffrey McDerm