⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John Doe 1 v. NCAA”

Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-05-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE No. 19-15566 ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST D.C. No. LITIGATION, 4:14-md-02541- CW SHAWNE ALSTON; MARTIN JENKINS; JOHNATHAN MOORE; KEVIN PERRY; WILLIAM TYNDALL; ALEX LAURICELLA; SHARRIF FLOYD; KYLE THERET; DUANE BENNETT; CHRIS STONE; JOHN BO
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-08-12 · Published · cited 5× · 932 F.3d 905
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAMAR DAWSON, No. 17-15973 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:16-cv-05487-RS NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION; PAC-12 OPINION CONFERENCE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United Sta
Indiana Supreme Court · 2017-08-24 · Published · cited 7× · 81 N.E.3d 199; 2017 Ind. LEXIS 625; 2017 WL 3632919
David, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part I agree with the majority that John Doe does not have a private light of action under the statute. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that he also does not have a common-law negligence claim. I believe under Webb, John may bring a common-law negligence claim.1 Accordingly, I would re
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR., On Nos. 14-16601 Behalf of Himself and All Others 14-17068 Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-03329- v. CW NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, AKA The NCAA, OPINION Defenda
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-09-29 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0316p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - WARRIOR SPORTS, INCORPORATED,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-09-09 · Published · cited 8× · 115 F.4th 1083
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HELEN DOE, parent and next friend No. 23-16026 of Jane Doe; JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe; KATE ROE, D.C. No. 4:23-cv- parent and next friend of Megan Roe; 00185-JGZ ROBERT ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superinten
Doe v. Hagenbeckpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 23× · 870 F.3d 36; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16604
DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. Assuming, as we must at this juncture of the case, that the allegations of the amended complaint are true, plaintiff-appellee Jane Doe was subjected to pervasive and serious sexual harassment, including rape, at the United States Military Academy at West Point (“West Point”). The harassment resulted from practices
District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019-01-18 · Published · cited 1× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 687
Joseph M. Hood, Senior U.S. District Judge *689This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE 13] or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a Response, under seal [DE 18], and Defendants has filed a Reply, under seal, in further support of their Motion [DE 24]. For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion will be grante
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 177 F. Supp. 3d 1380; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42991; 2016 WL 1270605
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves a public university’s investigation into a student’s claims that another student sexually assaulted her in a university dorm. Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges that defendant University of Alabama in Huntsville discriminated against her because of her sex in violation of Title IX of the Educa
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023-11-21 · Published · cited 5× · 86 F.4th 1224
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1826 ___________________________ Richard Hershey Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017-03-07 · Published · cited 186× · 850 F.3d 545; 2017 WL 894455; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4004; 101 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,757
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Medical residencies are a vital component of American medical education. McKeesport Hosp. v. ACGME, 24 F.3d 519, 525 (3d Cir. 1994). They provide new doctors a supervised transition between the pure academics of medical school and the realities of practice. Generally they do so successfully:
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010-09-16 · Published · cited 3× · 402 F. App'x 852
PER CURIAM: * Parents John and Jane Doe, and their minor daughter, H.S. (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the district court’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against District Attorney David Sheffield (“Sheffield”), Sils-bee Independent School District (“SISD”), Richard Bain, Jr., Gaye Lokey, Sissy Mclnnis (collectively, “Appellees”), and Rakheem Bolton.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 7× · 951 F.3d 728
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0060p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN M. HIGGINS; CAROL HIGGINS; WEATHERGUARD, ┐ INC., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006-03-08 · Published · cited 55× · 440 F.3d 336; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5762; 2006 WL 547821
BOGGS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff-appellant is a company that bid on two public construction projects, failed to win either of them, and now seeks to mend its misfortune by asking the federal courts to reverse the buyer’s judgment of the competing construction bids’ relative merits. Specifically, the appellant claims that the government purchasing entity and the winning private bidd
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 10× · 295 F. Supp. 2d 1141; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23434; 2003 WL 23104167
295 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2003) John DOE, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; and Constance H. Lau, Nainoa Thompson, Diane J. Plotts, Robert K.U. Kihune, and J. Douglas Ing, in their capacities as Trustees of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, Defendants. No. CIV. 03-00316 ACK/LE. United States District Court, D. H
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-04 · Published · cited 8× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 750; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25783; 2015 WL 1006852
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant J. Dennis Hastert (“Hastert”) to dismiss the amended complaint brought by Plaintiff J. David John (“John”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 9(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013-02-12 · Published · cited 1× · 923 F. Supp. 2d 1004; 2013 WL 557258; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18391
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge. This case involves various claims made by Plaintiffs, Long John Silver’s, Inc. and A & W Restaurants, Inc. (“A & W”) against Patrick Nickleson1 and three of his business entities2 (collectively “Defendants”) in connection with a series of failed restaurant franchises in Minne