Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Doe 1 v. NCAA”
Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Haw v. NCAApublic domain
Brandon Haw v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 866, Sept. Term 2022. Opinion by Arthur, J. PERSONAL JURISDICTION – SPECIFIC JURISIDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT ENTITY In this case, a Maryland resident brought suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), an unincorporated association of colleges and universities that issues and enforces rules governing college athletics. The plaintiff alleges that he suffers from neurodegenerative brain disease caused by repeated h
Shawne Alston v. Ncaapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE No. 19-15566 ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ATHLETIC GRANT-IN-AID CAP ANTITRUST D.C. No. LITIGATION, 4:14-md-02541- CW SHAWNE ALSTON; MARTIN JENKINS; JOHNATHAN MOORE; KEVIN PERRY; WILLIAM TYNDALL; ALEX LAURICELLA; SHARRIF FLOYD; KYLE THERET; DUANE BENNETT; CHRIS STONE; JOHN BO
Lamar Dawson v. Ncaapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAMAR DAWSON, No. 17-15973 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:16-cv-05487-RS NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION; PAC-12 OPINION CONFERENCE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United Sta
John Doe 1 v. Indiana Department of Child Servicespublic domain
David, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part I agree with the majority that John Doe does not have a private light of action under the statute. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that he also does not have a common-law negligence claim. I believe under Webb, John may bring a common-law negligence claim.1 Accordingly, I would re
NCAA v. Governor of New Jerseypublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 14-4546, 14-4568, and 14-4569 _____________ NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, a joint venture; NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; NATIONAL HOCKEY LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; OFFICE OF THE
Edward O'bannon, Jr. v. Ncaapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR., On Nos. 14-16601 Behalf of Himself and All Others 14-17068 Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cv-03329- v. CW NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, AKA The NCAA, OPINION Defenda
Warrior Sports, Incorporated v. NCAApublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0316p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - WARRIOR SPORTS, INCORPORATED,
Helen Doe v. Thomas Hornepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HELEN DOE, parent and next friend No. 23-16026 of Jane Doe; JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe; KATE ROE, D.C. No. 4:23-cv- parent and next friend of Megan Roe; 00185-JGZ ROBERT ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superinten
Doe v. Hagenbeckpublic domain
DENNY CHIN, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. Assuming, as we must at this juncture of the case, that the allegations of the amended complaint are true, plaintiff-appellee Jane Doe was subjected to pervasive and serious sexual harassment, including rape, at the United States Military Academy at West Point (“West Point”). The harassment resulted from practices
Doe v. University Of Kentuckypublic domain
Joseph M. Hood, Senior U.S. District Judge *689This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [DE 13] or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff has filed a Response, under seal [DE 18], and Defendants has filed a Reply, under seal, in further support of their Motion [DE 24]. For the reasons that follow, Defendants' Motion will be grante
Doe v. University of Alabamapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case involves a public university’s investigation into a student’s claims that another student sexually assaulted her in a university dorm. Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges that defendant University of Alabama in Huntsville discriminated against her because of her sex in violation of Title IX of the Educa
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinskipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1826 ___________________________ Richard Hershey Plaintiff - Appellee v. Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official
Jane Doe v. Mercy Catholic Medical Centerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Medical residencies are a vital component of American medical education. McKeesport Hosp. v. ACGME, 24 F.3d 519, 525 (3d Cir. 1994). They provide new doctors a supervised transition between the pure academics of medical school and the realities of practice. Generally they do so successfully:
Doe v. Silsbee Independent School Districtpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Parents John and Jane Doe, and their minor daughter, H.S. (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal the district court’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against District Attorney David Sheffield (“Sheffield”), Sils-bee Independent School District (“SISD”), Richard Bain, Jr., Gaye Lokey, Sissy Mclnnis (collectively, “Appellees”), and Rakheem Bolton.
John M. Higgins v. Ky. Sports Radio, LLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0060p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN M. HIGGINS; CAROL HIGGINS; WEATHERGUARD, ┐ INC., │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │
Expert Masonry, Inc. v. Boone County, Kentucky, Fiscal Court Don Salyers Masonry, Inc. Don Salyers John Doe 2public domain
BOGGS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff-appellant is a company that bid on two public construction projects, failed to win either of them, and now seeks to mend its misfortune by asking the federal courts to reverse the buyer’s judgment of the competing construction bids’ relative merits. Specifically, the appellant claims that the government purchasing entity and the winning private bidd
295 F.Supp.2d 1141 (2003) John DOE, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Jane Doe, Plaintiff, v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; and Constance H. Lau, Nainoa Thompson, Diane J. Plotts, Robert K.U. Kihune, and J. Douglas Ing, in their capacities as Trustees of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, Defendants. No. CIV. 03-00316 ACK/LE. United States District Court, D. H
United States ex rel. John v. Hastertpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHARLES P. KOCORAS, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendant J. Dennis Hastert (“Hastert”) to dismiss the amended complaint brought by Plaintiff J. David John (“John”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 9(b). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted. BACKGROUND
Long John Silver's Inc. v. Nicklesonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, District Judge. This case involves various claims made by Plaintiffs, Long John Silver’s, Inc. and A & W Restaurants, Inc. (“A & W”) against Patrick Nickleson1 and three of his business entities2 (collectively “Defendants”) in connection with a series of failed restaurant franchises in Minne