Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “John D Crooks and Wanda G Crooks”
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C
430 F.3d 59 MASSACHUSETTS ASSET FINANCING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.HARTER, SECREST & EMERY, LLP, Sardone, Robinson & Schnell, and MB Valuation Services, Inc., Defendants, Appellees, andWanda Kinney-Canary, d/b/a Tritech Appraisal Services, Defendant. No. 04-2541. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard April 6, 2005.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Lemon v. Martinpublic domain
502 S.E.2d 273 (1998) 232 Ga. App. 579 LEMON v. MARTIN. No. A98A1005. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 23, 1998. Reconsideration Denied May 20, 1998. Certiorari Denied October 5, 1998. *275 A. Russell Blank, Atlanta, for appellant. Gray & Hedrick, L. Bruce Hed
Shady Valley Park & Pool, Inc. v. Fred Weber, Inc.public domain
913 S.W.2d 28 (1995) SHADY VALLEY PARK & POOL, INC., Plaintiff/Respondent-Cross/Appellant, v. FRED WEBER, INC., Defendant/Appellant-Cross/Respondent. Nos. 66526, 66531. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. August 15, 1995. Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied September 25, 1995. Case Transferred October 24, 199
State v. Freemanpublic domain
PITMAN, J. | ¶ Defendant Dveil Deshon Freeman appeals his convictions and sentences for second degree murder and seven drug offenses. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS Beginning in 2008, Louisiana,State Police (“LSP”) began investigating Defendant for drug trafficking offenses, along with his co-conspirators Ivory Mock (aka Deek), David Green (aka Goose), Anthony Glosson (aka Ant), a
London v. Londonpublic domain
94 S.W.3d 139 (2002) Jeffrey LONDON, Appellant, v. Leticia LONDON, Appellee. No. 14-01-00603-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). November 14, 2002. *142 Pamela E. George, Houston, for Appellant. Walter P. Mahoney, Jr., Houston, for Appellee. Panel consists of Justices HUDSON, FOWLER, and DUGGAN.
London, Jeffrey v. London, Leticiapublic domain
Affirmed, in Part, and Reversed and Rendered, in Part, and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 14, 2002 Affirmed, in Part, and Reversed and Rendered, in Part, and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed November 14, 2002.
Strom v. Holiday Companiespublic domain
789 F.Supp.2d 1060 (2011) Jolene STROM, Plaintiff, v. HOLIDAY COMPANIES, Spencer Oil Co., and Ken Bloom, Defendants. No. C09-4025-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. June 6, 2011. *1063 Brooke Catherine Timmer, Paige Ellen Fiedler, Whitney C. Judkins, Fiedler Newkirk, PLC, Urbandale, IA, for Plaintiff.
Shields v. Keatingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BILBY, District Judge. Defendants seek decertification of the plaintiff class in these consolidated federal and state actions. Class plaintiffs purchased securities issued by American Continental Corporation (“ACC”), parent company to Lincoln Savings and Loan Association (“Lincoln”). The failure of the ACC/Lincoln enterprise precipitated the present actions against chairman Charl
Adams v. Star Enterprisepublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge LAY wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined. OPINION DONALD P. LAY, Senior Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND Star Enterprise1 operates an oil distribution facility in Fairfax, Virginia. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) determined in April 1992 that
Adams v. Star Enterprisepublic domain
51 F.3d 417 40 ERC 1513, 63 USLW 2651, 25 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,122 Nolan J. ADAMS; John G. Aiken, 4th; Adele C. Aiken; CraigAlderman, Jr.; Ronnie Alderman; Michael J. Alexander;Margaret Alexander; Peter W. Almquist; Karen G. Almquist;Joseph J. Angelo; Donald S. Arnstein; Elaine P. Arnstein;Robert A. Aserkoff; Francine R. Aserkoff; Richard AlbertAtwell; Mary E. Delaney; Alexander J. Balen
Eanes v. McKnightpublic domain
HAMLIN, Justice: Exercising our supervisory jurisdiction, we directed Certiorari to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for review of its judgment in these consolidated cases which affirmed in part, amended in part, reversed in part the judgment of the trial court and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in the Court of Appeal’s decision. Art. VII, Sec. 11, La.Con
Fleming v. Currypublic domain
OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Glass v. Commissionerpublic domain
NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th