Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “John Charles Laxton”
Laxton v. Watterspublic domain
348 F.Supp.2d 1024 (2004) John Lee LAXTON, Petitioner, v. Steve WATTERS, Respondent. No. 04-C-777-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. December 10, 2004. *1026 John Lee Laxton, pro se. Charles D. Hoornstra, Assistant Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Respondent. ORDER CRABB, District Ju
CRS Recovery, Inc. v. Laxtonpublic domain
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree that California law governs and that the primary question is whether possession of the domain name rl.com was acquired by theft or fraud. A secondary question is its alleged abandonment. Undisputed facts established that May-berry held the domain name rl.com registered through July 25, 2005. Undisputed facts established that Li Qiang transferred
State of Tennessee v. John Russell Giles, Jr.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 10, 2015 Session Heard at Greeneville1 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN RUSSELL GILES, JR. Appeal from the Criminal Court for Cumberland County No. 12-0436 Leon C. Burns, Jr., Judge No. E2014-02212-CCA-R3-CD-MARCH 10, 2016 Following a jury trial, the Defendant, John Russell Giles, Jr., was convicted of
McNeely v. . Laxtonpublic domain
This action was brought to recover the possession of one thousand *Page 240 acres of land, and damages for the detention. The real controversy is as to the true location of the land described in a grant to Jacob Anthony. This grant was introduced by the plaintiffs to show title out of the State, and they claimed that by virtue of a deed of Margaret Erwin to their ancestors, H.C. Tate, and seven years adverse possession, they had acquired title to the land
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 24, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE EX REL. INGER BROWN v. LARRY W. SHIPE, JR. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Knox County No. E-6994 Timothy E. Irwin, Judge No. E2014-02064-COA-R3-JV-FILED-OCTOBER 29, 2015 The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in its calculation of child
Ng-A-Mann v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.public domain
PER CURIAM: * John Ng-A-Mann appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to his employer, Sears, Roebuck & Co, on his claim of age discrimination. For the following reasons, we affirm. Ng-A-Mann worked as a commissioned salesman at the Deerbrook Mall Sears from 2000 until his termination in 2013. During his employment, Ng-A-Mann be
Nist v. Hallpublic domain
Filed 5/31/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX JOHN NIST, 2d Civil No. B284606 (Super. Ct. No. 15CV-0009) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County) v. STEVEN HALL, Defendant and Respondent. A good faith purchaser is “[a] p
George Anthony Braddock v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 14, 2013 GEORGE ANTHONY BRADDOCK V. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Houston County No. 4352 Robert E. Burch, Judge No. M2012-01605-CCA-R3-PC - Filed February 11, 2014 The petitioner, George Anthony Braddock, appeals the denial of his petition for post- c
Gregory Willis v. Cleco Corporationpublic domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Gregory Willis (“Willis”), who is an African-American, filed suit against his former employer, Cleco Corporation (“Cleco”), alleging race discrimination and retaliation under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. After two rounds of motions, the district court granted summary judgment to Cleco on all of Willis’s claims. On appeal, Willis raises three points of error. First, he argues that his retaliatio
Bourgeois v. United States Coast Guardpublic domain
MEMORANDUM RULING REBECCA F. DOHERTY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is a “Motion to Dismiss, and in the -Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgement” [Doc, 24] filed on behalf of.defendants, the United States Coast, Guard,, Marine Safety Unit (“USCG”) and Jeh Charles Johnson, the Secretary of Homeland Security (‘collectively, “defendants”),- wherein defendants seeks .dismissal with preju
State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey Owen Smithsonpublic domain
OPINION D. Kelly Thomas, Jr., J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which James Curwood Witt, Jr., and Robert H. Montgomery, Jr., JJ., joined. Following a jury trial, the Defendant, John Russell Giles, Jr., was convicted of premeditated first degree murder and sentenced to imprisonment for life.
United States v. Manbeckpublic domain
514 F.Supp. 141 (1981) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert John MANBECK, Thomas Manbeck, Kenneth Herring, Gary Gallopo, Mark Huiet Sale, David Martin Summerville, Lorenz Josephus Proden, Kermit Theodore Brogden, John O'Hare, Eddie Brantley, Thomas Earnest Folske, Thomas Sams Hightower, Timothy Alan Laxton, Harrel Lewis, Jr., John Isidore Stevens, Aaron Douglas Staetter, John Michael Iyoob, Robert Charles Michael, James Anthony Hastings, John Benja
744 F.2d 360 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Thomas MANBECK, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Kenneth HERRING, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Mark Huiet SALE, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Lorenz Josephus PRODEN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Kermit Theodore BROGDEN, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.
Isabel v. Velsicol Chemical Co.public domain
327 F.Supp.2d 915 (2004) Mildred ISABEL, Charles and Evalina Black, and Elizabeth Gate on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant. No. 04-2997-DV. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. July 30, 2004. *916 Arthur
Susan P. Asmo v. Keane, Inc.public domain
GRIFFIN, J., (pp. 598-601), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. Susan Asmo (Asmo) claimed that the defendant Keane, Inc. (Keane) terminated her employment because she was pregnant, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(k), and analogous pro
State v. Norrispublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE FILED JANUARY 1997 SESSION December 9, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE ) NO. 03C01-9606-CC-00212
State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Robin Skinner Prinzpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2013 Term _______________ FILED May 21, 2013 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 11-1265 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
American Justice Insurance Reciprocal v. Hutchisonpublic domain
15 S.W.3d 811 (2000) AMERICAN JUSTICE INSURANCE RECIPROCAL, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Tim HUTCHISON, Ben Harkins, Charles Spangler, Knox County, Tennessee and Sheriff Tim Hutchison, in his official capacity, Defendants/Appellees. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. March 27, 2000. *812 Paul Campbell, III, Witt, Gaither & Whitaker, P.C. Ch
617 F.3d 1127 (2010) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NETWORK SERVICES DEPOT, INC.; Network Marketing LLC; Network Services Distribution, Inc.; Charles V. Castro; Elizabeth L. Castro; Gregory High; Sunbelt Marketing, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, and Phyllis Watson, Relief Defendant. No. 09-15684. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Subm
OPINION BY Judge COVEY. Paey Associates, Inc. t/a 40 Below (Licensee) appeals from the Northampton County Common Pleas Court’s (trial court) January 3, 2013 order denying Licensee’s appeal from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board’s (PLCB) refusal to renew Licensee’s Restaurant Liquor License No. R-15950 (License). The issues for this Court’s review are: (1) whether Licensee was prejudiced because it did