Cases

Dismissed.

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment in part: To be taxable as self-employment income, an individual’s income must be (1) derived, (2) from a trade or business, (3) carried on by that individual. See 26 U.S.C. § 1402(a)-(b). Here the parties agree that the payments Christine Peterson received under Mary Kay’s Family Security Prog

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a partnership agreement, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated February 11, 2003, which granted that branch of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) which was to vacate his default in answering the complaint, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated March 6, 2003, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defenda

The opinion of the court was delivered by Luckert, J.: Jaylene Lambert, individually and as administrator of the estate of Stan Novak, asks us to reverse a district court order granting the defendants' motions to dismiss. The district court found her petition was filed one day after the statute of limitations had expired. She argues the statute of limitations does not act as a bar bec

TYSON, Judge. *240 GuideOne Mutual Insurance Company ("GuideOne"), an unnamed defendant, appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment in favor of Janice N. Peterson ("Plaintiff"). The order appealed from does not contain a Rule 54(b) ce

Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge *871Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss for improper venue, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim filed by defendants MidCap Financial Trust, f/k/a MidCap Financial, LLC ("MidCap Trust"), and MidCap Funding X Trust ("MidCap Funding") (collectively, "MidCap"). Dkt. 41, 42. This motion was orig

DILLON, Judge, concurring. I concur based on the conclusion that we are bound by holdings of our Court in the first appeal of this case, reported at Premier, Inc. v. Peterson , 232 N.C. App. 601, 755 S.E.2d 56

PER CURIAM: Alwin Peterson, Jr., appeals his 145-month sentence, imposed after pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Briefly stated, Peterson traveled to different cities and states and was the leader of the offense, accessed bank accounts by impersonating account holders, and recruited runners to make withdrawals from compromised accounts. The conduct in this case

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C, Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION For over fifteen years now, this Court has presided over a consolidated action brought by nearly one thousand plaintiffs against the Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) under the state sponsor of terrorism exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge. John Peterson sued the Royal Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and one of its agencies, the General Organization of Social Insurance (collectively, Saudi Arabia), seeking to recover mandatory contributions his employers made to a retirement program. Finding no exception i

HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Background The movants-Mr. David Cook and his firm, Cook Collection Attorneys, PLC (collectively "Cook")-now seek a common law equitable lien over the plaintiffs' attorneys' ("respondents") share of the recovery in this case and sequestration of the portion disputed in the ongoing arbitration between Cook and the respondents. ECF No. 575

DECISION AND ORDER LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge. John Peterson claims that Mid-State Group, Inc., terminated his employment in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). Before me now is Mid-State’s motion for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND In 1989, Schmidt Implement Company, a farm-equipment dealership located in Salem, Wisconsin, h

724 N.W.2d 765 (2006) 272 Neb. 700 John C. PETERSON and Kathy M. Peterson, husband and wife, appellants, v. The OHIO CASUALTY GROUP, a foreign insurance company, also known as West American Insurance Company, appellee. No. S-05-691. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 8, 2006. *769 Michael F. Coyle and Tim

McFadden, Judge. In this appeal from an order granting summary judgment, the appellant challenges the trial court’s finding that a valid transfer of property had been made pursuant to a power of attorney. Because there is evidence that the actions of the attorney-in-fact were in contravention of her principal’s actions and intent and were attempts *383to benefit her o

364 B.R. 301 (2006) Susan RANDHAVA Appellant, v. Richard C. PETERSON, Appellee. No. 06 C 4865. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 7, 2006. *302 John Anders Lipinsky, Coman & Anderson, P.C., Lisle, IL, for Appellant. Vincent A. Lavieri, Gardiner, Koch & Weisberg, Chicago, IL, for

OLIVER, District Judge. In 2014, the Circuit Court for the County of Kalkaska, Michigan vacated Plaintiff-Appellee Jamie Lee Peterson's ("Peterson") conviction for a 1996 rape and murder. Thereafter, he commenced this action, asserting federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Defendant Thomas E. Peterson, Jr. has moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Peterson seeks relief based on Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484 (2009), arguing that he was erroneously sentenced as a c

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER CLARK WADDOUPS, United States District Judge This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 47) and plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 48.) A hearing on these motions was held on September 28, 2016, at which time the court took the matter under advisement. The court has carefully considered the memoranda and

DAVIS, Judge. Dr. Dan Peterson (“Dr. Peterson”); Optum Computing Solutions, Inc.; Hitschler-Cera, LLC; Donald Bauman; Michael Held; the Held Family Limited Partnership; Robert Wagner; Alek Beynenson; I-Grant Investments, LLC; James Munter; Gail Shenk; Steven E. Davis; Charles W. Leonard, III; and John Does 1-10 (collectively “Defendants”) appeal from the trial court’s 11 Decembe

OPINION WINFREE, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A State of Alaska employee was discharged. With union representation, the employee challenged his termination in grievance proceedings; he was unsuccessful. When he later filed suit for wrongful termination, the State subpoenaed the union representative to appear for a deposition with the union's grievance file. The superior court denied the emplo