⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John Bridge and Melodie Bridge”

Ostrander v. Diltzpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2008-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 276 S.W.3d 623; 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 9320; 2008 WL 5221189
276 S.W.3d 623 (2008) Ed OSTRANDER and Melody Ostrander, Individually and as Next Friends of K.O., A Minor Child, Appellants, v. Dennis DILTZ and Laurie Diltz, Appellees. No. 05-08-00282-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. December 16, 2008. Joe A. Luce, John R. Stooksberry, Boyd-Veigel, P.C., McKinney, for appellants. Suzanne Irwin Calvert, Suzanne I. Cal
District Court, E.D. Texas · 1994-05-09 · Published · cited 3× · 855 F. Supp. 177; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7970; 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,118; 66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 848; 1994 WL 259669
855 F.Supp. 177 (1994) Melody A. KUCHLER v. BECHTEL CORPORATION. No. 1:93-CV-285. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. May 9, 1994. *178 Robert W. Rickard, Swearingen, Clark & Moore, Port Arthur, TX, for plaintiff. John A. Irvine and Raymond D. Davis, Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Houst
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012-12-07 · Published · cited 0× · 56 A.3d 442; 2012 WL 6082703; 2012 R.I. LEXIS 151
OPINION Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on October 25, 2012, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. The plaintiff, Maria Carbone (plaintiff), appeals from the Superior Court’s entry of summary judg
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 909 S.W.2d 762; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1912; 1995 WL 686432
LOWENSTEIN, Presiding Judge. This action for prohibition under Rule 97 involves the attorney-client privilege and the *763work product exception in the context of an inspection, via discover)', of all the files of an attorney representing the employer in a workers’ compensation claim. The claimant is being criminally prosecuted for fraud under § 287.128, RSMo 1994, an
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-07-30 · Published · cited 2× · 15 N.E.3d 23; 2014 WL 3739652; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 367
OPINION ROBB, Judge. Case Summary and Issues This case centers on a newly constructed home purchased by Michael and Melody Bogan (collectively, “Bogan”) in the Lake Stonebridge subdivision in Fishers. Since the home’s construction in 1999, it has experienced two incidents of flooding in the lower level. In response to th
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-08-22 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-2478 ___________ John E. Winfield, * * Petitioner-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court
Washington Supreme Court · 2012-03-01 · Published · cited 70× · 174 Wash. 2d 1; 271 P.3d 234
Chambees, J. ¶ 1 After a lengthy trial, a judge found that the State had established all statutory and constitutional factors necessary for the termination of Nyakat Luak’s parental rights to her twin sons. Luak argues that the trial court erred in finding two of the statutory factors: that the State expressly and understandably offered or provided to her all the necessary services to correct her parental deficiencies and that ther
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006-08-22 · Published · cited 92× · 460 F.3d 1026; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21369; 2006 WL 2404058
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. John Winfield was convicted in Missouri state court of multiple counts of murder, assault, and armed criminal action and was sentenced to death. After his conviction and sentence were affirmed by the Mis *1030 souri Supreme Court on direct appeal, he moved for post convicti
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014-05-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 Ohio 2192
[Cite as Turner v. Lorain Corr. Inst., 2014-Ohio-2192.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101350 JOHN L. TURNER, JR. RELATOR
Washington Supreme Court · 2002-02-14 · Published · cited 57× · 145 Wash. 2d 528
Bridge, J. Presented here is a class of insured individuals who claim that title insurance companies should have made certain disclosures to them in preliminary commitments for title insurance. Specifically, these insureds claim that the companies should have disclosed that the parcels of land securing the loans had not been divided from larger tracts, that a senior lien existed on two of the lots, and that loan proceeds were bei
Washington Supreme Court · 2002-02-14 · Published · cited 59× · 39 P.3d 984
39 P.3d 984 (2002) Herbert BARSTAD and Diane Barstad, husband and wife, together with their marital community; Scott Duda and Carlene Duda, husband and wife, together with their marital community; Clarence Heiser and Harriett Heiser, husband and wife, together with their marital community; Ingeborg Keicher, an individual; James Koetje and Margaret Koetje, husband and wife, together with their marital community; Thomas Lian and Mabel Lian, husband and wif
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-06 · Published · cited 3× · 602 U.S. 222
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 222–256 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 6, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-05-19 · Published · cited 2× · 2016 Ohio 3057
[Cite as Nationstar Mtge., L.L.C. v. Dimasi, 2016-Ohio-3057.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 102985 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE L.L.C. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
Washington Supreme Court · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 11× · 160 Wash. 2d 268; 157 P.3d 379
¶33 (concurring) — I write separately to indicate that although I fully concur with Justice Madsen’s conclusion that it is lawful for two or more cities to agree that one of the cities will provide municipal court services for another city, I encourage the legislature to consider eliminating legislative authorization for this practice. While I am generally loath to set forth my own views on what may appear to be entirely a matter of public policy, I do
Cleveland v. McCoypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-06-16 · Published · cited 1× · 2016 Ohio 3451
[Cite as Cleveland v. McCoy, 2016-Ohio-3451.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103276 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-10-03 · Published · cited 3× · 2013 Ohio 4376
[Cite as GMAC Mtge., L.L.C. v. Waller, 2013-Ohio-4376.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99457 GMAC MORTGAGE, L.L.C. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 05-0136V Filed: June 24, 2015 For Publication ******************************** LAURA HOLT, parent of * A.H.T., a minor, * Autism; Entitlement; * Mitochondrial
State v. Commanderpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009-06-11 · Published · cited 4× · 681 S.E.2d 31; 384 S.C. 66; 2009 S.C. App. LEXIS 227
384 S.C. 66 (2009) 681 S.E.2d 31 The STATE, Respondent, v. Christopher Sam COMMANDER, Appellant. No. 4560. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 18, 2009. Decided June 11, 2009. Rehearing Denied August 25, 2009. *68 Deputy Chief Appellate Defender for Capital App
State v. Harnerpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2004-12-23 · Published · cited 32× · 153 Wash. 2d 228
*231¶1 These consolidated cases require us to determine whether the absence of a drug court in the county where a defendant is charged violates that defendant’s rights to equal protection or due process. The Washington State Legislature has enabled counties to promulgate drug courts under RCW 2.28.170. We accepted review of State v. Harner from Division Two of the Court of Appeals and then