Cases

BY: KEVIN J. CAREY, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE *275Before the Court is (1) the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (the "District") Motion for a Determination that it has Alleged a Prima Facie Case for Application of the 11 U.S.C. §

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an expedited election action for a writ of prohibition to prevent the board of elections from placing an ordinance proposed by an initiative petition on the November 4, 2008 election ballot. In the alternative, relators initially requested a writ of mandamus to compel the board of elections to decide a protest against the petition filed by two of the three relators, but upon the board’s subsequent d

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING THIRD-PARTY RELEASES UNDER THE DEBTORS’ JOINT PLAN STUART M, BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge:. On July 28, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtors’ Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization, dated July 20, 2017 (the “Plan”).1 The Plan contains a broad third-party release (the “Release”) in favor

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER OVERRULING SHAREHOLDER OBJECTIONS TO CONFIRMATION OF THE DEBTORS’ JOINT PLAN > STUART M. BERNSTEIN, United States Bankruptcy Judge: The' Court confirmed the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of SunEdison, Inc. and Its Debtor Affiliates, dated July 20, 2017 (the “Plan”) by order dated July 28, 2017. (See EC

JOHN M. WALKER, JR. Chief Judge: Joseph Russo, Anthony Russo, and Joseph Monteleone, Sr., appeal from judgments entered March 22, 1999 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles P. Sifton, District Judge) convicting them, after a jury trial, of racketeering and racketeering conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d); murder and conspiracy to commit murder in furthera

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12675 THE McLEAN HOSPITAL CORPORATION vs. TOWN OF LINCOLN & others.1 Suffolk.

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: On May 8, 1974, a seven-count indictment charging fourteen defendants with conspiracy to import, sell, distribute and possess with intent to distribute large amounts of heroin and cocaine and with various substantive offenses relating to trafficking in those drugs was filed in the Un

717 F.2d 700 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1388 BRINK'S INC., Appellant,v.The CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellee.BRINK'S INC., Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.John ADAMS, Anthony De Nardo, Trevor Fairweather, RichardFlorio, James Gargiulo, Michael Solomon, William J. Donovan,Francis Gitto, William McInerney, Anthony San Marco, JamesSpringett, John Barrera and Joseph Nardo, Appellees,andJorge Olivari,

OPINION EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.* All defendants have moved for summary judgment, maintaining that the hemodialysis catheters they make or used to make do not infringe Dr. Mahurkar’s patent No. 4,134,402 (the ’402 patent). This, the oldest of the Mahurkar patents in issue (five other U.S. utility patents, one U.S. design patent, and one Canadian design patent play large rol

835 F.Supp. 1440 (1993) Frederick B. LAVERPOOL, Sr., Andrew Wilder, Jr., Percy Jackson, Lamont Gill, Keldric C. Browne, Jr., and Alton Jones, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY and Robert F. Kiley, individually as in his official capacity as Chairman of the Metropolitan Transit Authority, Defendants. No. CV 90-2327 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York.

778 P.2d 315 (1989) Carol A. ROMBERG, a/k/a Carole Hinman Romberg, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. David R. SLEMON; Anthony J. Mazza; John D. LaSalle; Basalt Associates, a Colorado general partnership; Basalt Development Company, a general partnership; Basalt Commercial Land Company, a general partnership; The Town of Basalt, Colorado; Mountain State Telephone and Telegraph Company, d/b/a Mountain Bell, Defendants-Appellees and Cross-A

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. (Doc. 73.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND David Johns and Marc Bordman (“Plaintiffs”) seek to certify a California class for the Unfa

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: The government appeals from that portion of a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles P. Sifton, Chief Judge) granting a new trial to defendants-appellees Joseph P. Russo, Anthony Russo, and Joseph Monteleone, Sr. See United States v. Persico, No. CR-92-0351, 1997 WL 867788 (E.D.N.Y. March 13, 1997). The district court grante

OPINION EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judged.† Shortly after I issued Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 745 F.Supp. 517 (N.D.Ill.1990), the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred to me two related cases. A fourth case was transferred from within the Northern District of Illinois. On October 29, 1990, I held an initial conference to set schedules for the consolidated p

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. Before the court are Plaintiff Antonio Velasquez’s objections to Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) that recommended granting summary judgment for Defendant International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (AFL-CIO) Local 553 (“Local 553” or “the union”) on Plaintiffs federal

ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS JOHN A. HOUSTON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the parties’ supplemental briefs on modification of the class definition. After a careful consideration of the briefs and relevant exhibits submitted by the parties, the Court sets forth its decision below. BACKGROUND 1. Factual Backgr

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge In this consolidated litigation, Plaintiffs Robert Herskowitz (“Herskowitz”) and Phoebe Juel (“Juel”), individually and on behalf of those similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege that Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) routinely and unlawfully charges its “e-Store” customers more than once for t

809 F.2d 75 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 418 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Edward WILLIAMS, Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Andrew BLANDIN, a/k/a "Zigzag" "Jigsaw," Defendant, Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Anthony TATE, a/k/a "Coco," Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 86-1082 to 86-1084. United States C

145 F.3d 551 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Victor J. ORENA; Pasquale Amato; Carmine Sessa; MichaelSessa; Lawrence A. Fiorenza; Lawrence Mazza; RobertZambardi; Alphonse Persico; Joseph Tomasello; TheodorePersico, Sr.; Richard Fusco; James Delmastro, Defendants,Joseph P. Russo; Anthony Russo; and Joseph Monteleone,Sr., Defendants-Appellees. Docket Nos. 97-1174 to 97-1176.