⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “John Admire Banks”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25b0002p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: JOHN PRESTON THOMPSON, │ Debtor. │ ___________________________________________ │ TEENA COL
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 1× · 76 Fed. Cl. 686; 37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20102; 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 133; 2007 WL 1300768
OPINION HEWITT, Judge. The court has before it defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Motion or Def.’s Mot.), filed on February 26, 2007, Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Partially Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Response or PL’s Resp.), filed on March 21, 2007, and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Par
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2024-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CA-01150-COA TIFFANY MICHELLE TILLEY APPELLANT v. JOHN MICHAEL GIBBS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/20/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RODNEY PURVIS FAVER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LOWNDES COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTO
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-12-03 · Published · cited 21× · 177 F. Supp. 2d 239; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19954; 2001 WL 1549229
177 F.Supp.2d 239 (2001) Maybell E. BANKS, as Administratrix of the Estate of her son Kenneth BANKS, and on her own behalf, Plaintiff, v. P.O. Craig YOKEMICK, Defendant. No. 99 Civ. 10815(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 3, 2001. *240 *241
Ohio Supreme Court · 2013-06-04 · Published · cited 35× · 2013 Ohio 2237; 136 Ohio St. 3d 58; 990 N.E.2d 568
O’Neill, J., dissenting. {¶ 40} I must respectfully dissent from the well-reasoned majority opinion because this case presents a perfect opportunity to right a wrong in the area of workers’ compensation law. The claimant here was involved in a truly gruesome motor-vehicle accident, in the course and scope of his employment, that left him traumatically psychologicall
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018-02-12 · Published · cited 1× · 177 A.3d 482
February 12, 2018 Supreme Court John R. Grasso : v. : No. 2016-83-Appeal. (PC 13-3121) Gina M. Raimondo et al. : John R. Grasso : v. : No. 2015-378-M.P.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-06-06 · Published · cited 11× · 891 F.3d 1277
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal from the denial of a warrant in rem for the arrest of a vessel requires us to decide whether we have interlocutory jurisdiction, and if so, whether John Minott established that the injury he allegedly suffered while boarding the Brunello entitles him to a warrant in rem for the arrest o
Utah Supreme Court · 2011-10-18 · Published · cited 6× · 275 P.3d 208; 2011 UT 62; 693 Utah Adv. Rep. 16; 2011 WL 5110962; 2011 Utah LEXIS 143
On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION T1 The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) condemned real property belonging to Admiral Beverage Corporation (Admiral) as part of the reconstruction of the Interstate 15 freeway (I-15). Admiral is entitled to compensation from the state for the taking of its property. In the
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020-12-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2020 IL App (1st) 180223
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0218p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JOHN EWALT, STEVE WYLIE, and BONNIE NAVARRE, on │ behal
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2020-06-12 · Published · cited 0× · 157 N.E.3d 1097; 441 Ill. Dec. 740; 2020 IL App (1st) 180223
2020 IL App (1st) 180223 FIRST DISTRICT SIXTH DIVISION June 12, 2020 No. 1-18-0223 JOHN CRANE INC., ) Appeal from the ) Circuit C
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: JOHN C. KIRKLAND; No. 22-70092 POSHOW ANN KIRKLAND, as Trustee of the Bright Conscience Trust B.C. No. 2:12-ap- dated September 9, 2009. 02424-ER ______________________________ JOHN C. KIRKLAND; POSHOW ANN KIRKLAND, as Trustee of the OPINION Bright Conscience Trust dated September 9, 2009, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES BANK
California Court of Appeal · 2022-12-27 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 12/27/22 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOHN’S GRILL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A162709 v. (San Francisco Super. Ct. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL No. CGC-20-584184) SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants and
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012-06-20 · Published · cited 11× · 683 F.3d 714; 2012 WL 2330701; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12514
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0188p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - KENNETH E. HAGGARD; MARYANN Plaint
California Supreme Court · 2024-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN’S GRILL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. S278481 First Appellate District, Division Four A162709 San Francisco City and County Superior Court
People v. Bankspublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993-01-25 · Published · cited 30× · 609 N.E.2d 864; 241 Ill. App. 3d 966; 182 Ill. Dec. 330; 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 62
609 N.E.2d 864 (1993) 241 Ill. App.3d 966 182 Ill.Dec. 330 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert BANKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-88-2647. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. January 25, 1993. *866 Randolph N. Stone, Cook County
California Court of Appeal · 2023-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/23/23 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOHN’S GRILL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A162709 v. (San Francisco Super. Ct. THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL No. CGC-20-584184) S
Banks v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990-11-01 · Published · cited 26× · 581 A.2d 439; 84 Md. App. 582; 1990 Md. App. LEXIS 164
84 Md. App. 582 (1990) 581 A.2d 439 WILLIAM EUGENE BANKS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1925, September Term, 1989. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. November 1, 1990. John L. Kopolow, Asst. Public Defender (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for appellant. Kreg Paul Greer, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., A
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 383 F.3d 1207
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. At one level, this is a dispute over loan payments secured by a nearly 30 year old Pontiac Trans Am. At another level, this case tests the limits of a bankruptcy trustee’s statutory power to displace existing lienholders. Agreeing with the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (“BAP”), we hold that a bankruptcy trustee who successfully avoids a lien pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 551 preser
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-02-22 · Published · cited 33× · 516 F.3d 1207; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 3755; 49 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 155; 2008 WL 466398
516 F.3d 1207 (2008) In re Christopher Lee HABERMAN, also known as Chris L. Haberman; Catherine May Haberman, also known as Cathie M. Haberman, also known as Cathie M. Tucker, Debtors. J. Michael Morris, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. St. John National Bank, Defendant-Appellee, Christopher. Lee Haberman and Catherine May Haberman, Defendants. No. 06-3324. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth