Cases

353 B.R. 465 (2006) In re WELLINGTON APARTMENT, LLC, Debtor. Wellington Apartment, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Charles Clotworthy, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-50301-DHA, Adversary No. 05-5029. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. October 20, 2006. *466 *467

350 B.R. 213 (2006) In re WELLINGTON APARTMENT, LLC, Debtor. Wellington Apartment, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Charles H. Clotworthy, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-50301-DHA, Adversary No. 05-5029. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division. August 24, 2006. *214 *215

This represents a consolidation of two cases involving the same state of facts, and is from adverse judgments against the Plaintiffs in Error after trial of the causes in the Court below. The record shows that the litigation arose out of an automobile accident at a time when Mrs. Kozak and Mrs. Helen H. Mazur were riding as guests in the automobile of Mrs. Ake, of which she was the driver. Mrs. Kozak was injured as was also Mrs. Mazur, and each, together with their husbands sought reco

Opinion of the Court COOK, Judge: Despite his pleas, the accused was convicted by special court-martial, military judge alone, of wrongful possession of marihuana in the hashish form, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 2 months, forfeiture of $279 per month for 2 months, and r

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON EV-ERYSCAPE, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENTS NOS. 6,411,742 and 7,095,905 STEARNS, District Judge. In this motion (Dkt. #245), counterclaim-defendant EveryScape, Inc. moves for summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,411,742 (the '742 patent) and 7,095,905 (the '905 patent).1 EveryScape alleges that

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT STEARNS, District Judge. In this motion, defendant Adobe Systems, Inc., seeks summary judgment of noninfringement as to the “Color Correction Claims” of United States Patent Nos. 7,327,374 (the '374 patent) and 7,593,022 (the '022 patent). The motion is a companion to two prior cross-motions, in which Adobe sought

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On May 14, 2019, the applicants of the Counties of the State of Indiana set opposite their respective names as set forth in Exhibit "A" (attached hereto and made a part hereof) personally appeared in open Court. The State Board of Law Examiners of the State of Indiana, after due investigation as to the moral character and fitness of the applicants and examination to determine their respectiv

224 F.Supp.2d 1285 (2002) FULL FAITH CHURCH OF LOVE WEST, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOOVER TREATED WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 01-2597-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. September 26, 2002. *1286 Michael B. Lowe, Christopher J. Sherman, Payne & Jones, Chtd., Overland Park, KS, Scott C. Long, McCor

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HIRAM H. WARD, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Limited Stay of Proceedings (November 2, 1987). In the underlying action, plaintiff seeks a declaration of noninfringement, invalidity, and/or *156unenforceability with respect to three United States Patents. Additionally, plaintiff

NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge. Willi Moeller (Moeller), having sued Ion-etics, Inc. for infringement, appeals from the October 15, 1984, grant of partial summary judgment of noninfringement of claim 4 of Patent No. 3,562,129 (the ‘129 patent) by the District Court of the Central District of California, No. 83-7551-DAR. We vacate and

178 F.Supp.2d 1003 (2001) John & Mary DOE as Parents and John & Mary Doe as Guardians on behalf of John Doe, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Cutter Biological, a Division of Miles, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Defendants. John & Mary Doe as Parents and John & Mary Doe as Guardians on behalf of John Doe, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Cutter Biological, a Division of Miles, Inc., et al., Def

J-A22039-17 2018 PA Super 267 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT SCHNALL, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN SENESE, JOHN OF SHURINA, JOHN SIGNORILE, KEVIN PENNSYLVANIA SOKOL, ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK VENTRELLA, JOSEPH VITALE, PATRICK VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND WILLIAM YOUNGSON, Appellants v. AMERICAN LAFRANCE, LLC AND FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION,

J-E02001-19 2020 PA Super 149 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 EDA

J-E02001-19 2020 PA Super 149 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 EDA

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0209p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ WILD EGGS HOLDINGS, INC.; WILD EGGS OPERATIONS, │ LLC; WILD EGGS FRANCHISI

747 F.Supp.2d 997 (2010) EAZYPOWER CORPORATION, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff, v. JORE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. No. 04 C 6372. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 20, 2010. *998 Kevin Keith McQuillan, McQuillan Law Office, Naperville, IL, for Plaintiff. Breigha

OPINION Justice McCAFFERY. The issue presented in this case is whether expert testimony is required to convict a defendant of driving under the influence of a drug or combination of drugs, 75 Pa.C.S. § 8802(d)(2), when the drugs in question are prescription medications. Because the Superior Court erroneously concluded that expert testimony was required under this statutory provision, we reve

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal from the appointment of a temporary receiver. The principal legal issue is whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) has power to regulate off-exchange options involving foreign currencies. Based on a prior decision of this court binding on this panel, we hold that it does and affirm.

2025 IL App (1st) 231912 No. 1-23-1912 First Division February 18, 2025 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

J-A22039-17 2018 PA Super 267 KENNETH MURRAY, ROBERT : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SCHNALL, MICHAEL SCOTT, JOHN : PENNSYLVANIA SENESE, JOHN SHURINA, JOHN : SIGNORILE, KEVIN SOKOL, : ANTHONY TRICARICO, FRANK : VENTRELLA, JOSPH VITALE, PATRICK : VOGT, HENRY WHITE, WILLIAM : WHITE, THOMAS WOSKA AND : WILLIAM YOUNGSON, : No. 2105 ED