Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Johansen v. Origin Warranty, LLC”
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
615 F.3d 1352 (2010) ADVANCED BODYCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. THIONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee, *1353 Naturecity, LLC, Carl Pradelli, Third Party-Counter-Defendant. No. 09-13151. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. August 25, 2010.
Memorandum Decision CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: €1 The Townhomes at Pointe Meadows Owners Association (the Association) challenges the district court's denial of the Association's motion to extend discovery deadlines, exclusion of the Association's untimely disclosed experts, and ultimate grant of summary judgment against the Association on all of its claims. We affirm. T2 This case arises from alleged de
In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-25-00099-CV ANNA TEXAS LAND, LTD., AND E. TAYLOR ARMSTRONG, JR., Appellants V. ANACAPRI LAGUNA AZURE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-25-06901 Be
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Digitas, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2113 KEN JOHANSEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, SPANISH QUOTES, INC., d/b/a WeSpeakInsurance, Defendant,
Industrial Commercial Electric, Inc. v. McLeespublic domain
101 P.3d 593 (2004) INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ELECTRIC, INC., an Alaska Corporation, and Michael W. Hannaman, Appellants, v. Rick L. McLEES, individually, Rick L. McLees d/b/a Ricky McLees Electric, Janet McLees, McLees Electric, LLC, and Michael Landowski, Appellees. No. S-10447. Supreme Court of Alaska. November 12, 2004. *594 Vern
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MANKIEWICZ COATINGS, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT K. MICHAEL MOORE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff Hawaiian Airlines, Ine.’s (“HAL”) and Defendant Mankiewicz Coatings, LLC’s (“Mankiewicz”) cross-motions for summary judgment. HAL moves for partial summary
Kemly v. Werner Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge While using Defendant Werner Co.’s (hereinafter, “Defendant”) AP20-MPJ *499Work Platform, a 41” tall portable aluminum work platform supported by two collapsible legs (hereinafter, the “work platform” or “platform”), Plaintiff Robert-R. Kemly (hereinafter, “Plaintiff’) suffered injuries during dismount when
Katz v. Spiniello Companiespublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, J. I. Introduction This case arises out of a May 31, 2014 airplane crash that occurred in Bedford, Massachusetts during the takeoff rotation of a Gulfstream G-IV aircraft, killing all passengers onboard. Plaintiffs Drew Katz and Melissa Silver (“Plaintiffs”), individually and as the co-personal representatives of the estate of Lewis A. Katz, a passenger on the
Flores v. Act Event Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER A. JOE FISH, Senior District Judge. Before the court are the defendants’ motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (docket entries 13, 15). For the reasons stated below, the motions are granted with respect to the putative collective action and all named plaintiffs, except for Rosa Hernandez. With respect to Hernandez, the motions are denied.
Northwestern v. PSCpublic domain
09/27/2016 DA 15-0612 Case Number: DA 15-0612 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 239 NORTHWESTERN CORPORATION, doing business as NORTHWESTERN ENERGY, Petitioner and Appellant, v. THE MONTANA DEPARTMENT
Wedderburn Corp. v. Jetcraft Corp.public domain
Wedderburn Corp. v. Jetcraft Corp., 2015 NCBC 101. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 15 CVS 757 WEDDERBURN CORPORATION, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
Worrell v. ELLIOTT & FRANTZpublic domain
799 F.Supp.2d 343 (2011) George WORRELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ELLIOTT & FRANTZ, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-4443. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 28, 2011. *346 Louis J. Devoto, Rossetti & Devoto, PC, Cherry Hill, NJ, for Plaintiffs. Michael L. Simonini, Kennedy Campbell Lipski &
Thomas v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp.public domain
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [16] BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Thomas’s Complaint pursuant *940to Federal Rule of Civil Procedur
JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants Northwestern Corporation, doing business as Northwestern Energy (Northwestern), the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Human Resources Council, District XI (HRC), appeal the decision of the Second Judicial District Court affirming the Final Order of the Montana-Public Service Commission (Commission), which disallowed $1,419,427 in claimed e
Lockhart v. Draperpublic domain
209 P.3d 1025 (2009) Earl C. LOCKHART, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Duane DRAPER, Michael J. Draper, Denise Gauthier, and Diane Baker, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Nos. S-12868, S-12838. Supreme Court of Alaska. June 26, 2009. *1027 Andrew J. Fierro, Law Office of Andrew J. Fierro, Inc., Anchorage, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Professional Service Industries, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 39), filed March 20, 2011, and Plaintiff Spanish/Cypress Fort I, L.P.’s Motion to Partially Strike Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 42), filed March 25, 2011. Having considered the Motions, the Court hereby DENIES both Defendant’s Motion to D
Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (Motions for Summary Judgment) JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge. Pending before the court are the defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Docket 161], Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on Preemption of Certain Claims [Docket 178], Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Punitive Damages [Docket 187], and Plaintiffs Jo and Allen Huskey’s Motion for Partial Summary
Noor v. Statepublic domain
This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2019 UT 3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. OSMAN MOHAMMED NOOR, Appellant.
ACCEPTED 05-14-01515-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/16/2015 4:01:51 PM