⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Joel Smith”

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2010-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed as Modified and Memorandum Opinion filed November 30, 2010. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2009 JEREMY WHITE v. WARDEN TOMMY MILLS, DISCIPLINARY CHAIRPERSON SGT. JOE SPICER, AND SGT. JOEL SMITH An Appeal from the Chancery Court for Lake County No. 5469 Tony A. Childress, Chancellor N
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2021-10-08 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, September 27, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0037. DONNEL JOEL-MATTHEW SCOTT v. KATHEY SMITH-DENTON. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a c
State v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2016-03-30 · Published · cited 0× · 783 S.E.2d 502; 368 N.C. 821; 2016 N.C. LEXIS 295; 2016 WL 1273291
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th of March 2016 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of March 2016."
State v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2016-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 368 N.C. 821
Def’s Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari to Review Order of COA (COAP16-545) Denied 03/30/2016
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016-07-14 · Published · cited 8× · 829 F.3d 610; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12920; 2016 WL 3769298
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Joel Marvin Munt was convicted by a jury in Minnesota state court of the shooting death of his ex-wife and of kidnaping his three children. Munt sought habeas relief in federal court, arguing that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution when it refused to strike a juror, identified by the initials B.S., as biased. The district court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1230 CA 11-00323 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ. TOWN OF ANGELICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOEL S. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF AGGRESSIVE COMPANY, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS DIVERSIFIED CONTRACTING COMPANY AND AGGRESSIVE COMPANY, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS DIVERSIFIED CONTRACTING CO
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-03-19 · Published · cited 0×
Order filed March 19, 2019 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-18-01030-CV ____________ ANTONIO DUDLEY, Appellant V. AMY KIEL, JESSICA KUHRE, JOEL BUTLER, AND ANDREW SMITH, Appellees On Appeal fr
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 16, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01030-CV ANTONIO DUDLEY, Appellant V. AMY KIEL, JESSICA KUHRE, JOEL BUTLER, AND ANDREW SMITH, Appellees On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris Coun
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017-02-02 · Published · cited 2× · 847 F.3d 297; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1911; 2017 WL 465299
PER CURIAM: Joel Humberto Renteria-Martinez appeals the district court’s application of a 16-level sentence enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, based on a previous Texas state conviction that the district court found to be a drug trafficking offense. Although the state court judgment for the previous conviction indicated that Renteri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-04-24 · Published · cited 1× · 713 F.3d 407; 2013 WL 1748541; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8291
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Joel Castillo was convicted of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The district court 1 denied Castillo’s motion for judgment of acquittal and his request for an offense level reduction based on mitigating role before sentencing him to 235 months,
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2001-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 66 S.W.3d 483; 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 8536; 2001 WL 1622200
SAM GRIFFITH, Justice. The State of Texas (“State”) appeals the trial court’s September 18, 2000 dismissal of a misdemeanor information charging Joel David Smith (“Appellee”) with driving while intoxicated. The State raises one issue on appeal. We affirm. Background Appellee was charged on June 27, 1995, with driving whi
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2002-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
State v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 9 So. 3d 143; 2009 La. LEXIS 985; 2009 WL 1608881
In re Smith, Joel; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. G, No. 11-04-0557; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2007/KA/0167. Denied.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 588 F. App'x 181
JUDGMENT ORDER PATTY SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge. Joel Diaz-Hinirio pleaded guilty to violations of the federal drug and firearms laws, but preserved his right to appeal the District Court’s order that denied his motions to suppress the evidence seized from a premises, his identification, and his statements to law enforcement.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-12-02 · Published · cited 2× · 79 So. 3d 67; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19200; 2011 WL 6032692
79 So.3d 67 (2011) TWIN OAKS VILLAS, LTD., Appellant, v. JOEL D. SMITH, L.L.C., and Con Cor Construction, Inc., Appellees. No. 1D11-1594. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 2, 2011. Rehearing Denied January 20, 2012. *68 Michael G. Meyer and George W. Tate, III, of Broad and Cassel, Orl
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-07-26 · Published · cited 1× · 897 F.3d 515
Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by appellants in the above-entitled case has been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service. The judges who issued the Court's decision have voted to grant panel rehearing. Accordi
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-07-26 · Published · cited 112× · 897 F.3d 518
McKEE, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to decide whether the District Court correctly refused to enjoin the defendant School District from allowing transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that are consistent with the students' gender identities as opposed to the sex they were determined to have at birth. The plaintiffs-a group of high school students who identify
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 893 F.3d 179
McKEE , Circuit Judge . This appeal requires us to decide whether the District Court correctly refused to enjoin the defendant School District from allowing transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that are consistent with the students' gender identities as opposed to the sex they were determined to have at birth. The plaintiffs
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-01-07 · Published · cited 33× · 705 F.3d 951; 2013 WL 65430; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 416
Circuit Judge TALLMAN with whom Chief Judge KOZINSKI and Circuit Judges O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, BEA, IKUTA, and N.R. SMITH join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: By failing to take this case en banc we have made a hash of the plain error standard. Under the guise of a plain error review, the majority has conducted a de novo analysis, concluding that the district