⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Joel A Mead and Linda D Mead”

Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 IL App (5th) 231205
NOTICE 2025 IL App (5th) 231205 Decision filed 12/11/25. The text of this decision may be NOS. 5-23-1205, 5-23-1213 cons. changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ____________________________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-15-00219-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/19/2015 8:06:13 PM
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016-08-16 · Published · cited 40× · 2016 ME 136; 147 A.3d 842; 2016 Me. LEXIS 147; 2016 WL 4367255
HJELM, J. [¶ 1] In 2012, the Town of Scarborough reassessed the tax valuation of parcels of land located in several areas within the Town, including the Pine Point, Higgins Beach, and Pillsbury Shores neighborhoods. Donald Petrin and other plaintiffs 1 (collectively, the Taxpayers) own parcels of land in those neighborhoo
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 1028× · 183 L. Ed. 2d 450; 132 S. Ct. 2566; 567 U.S. 519; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 4876
*529Chief Justice Roberts announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, and III-C, an opinion with respect to Part IV, in which Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan join, and an opinion with respect to Parts III-A, III-B, and III-D. *530Today w
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015-07-29 · Published · cited 23× · 172 So. 3d 893; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11352
SUAREZ, C.J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority decision has established an entirely new standard for the application of section 775.087(1), Florida Statutes,6 governing the reclassification of certain crimes, not only in direct conflict with Florida Supreme Court precedent interpreting that statute, but also precedent out of every Florida district court of appeal in
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009-03-26 · Published · cited 5× · 621 F. Supp. 2d 274; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26254; 2009 WL 838490
621 F.Supp.2d 274 (2008) In Re MUSHROOM DIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Actions. Master File No. 06-0620. Nos. 06-0638, 06-0657, 06-0677, 06-0861, 06-0932, 06-1464, 06-1854. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 26, 2009. *275 Adam M. Moskowitz, Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti, Kozyak T
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-08-07 · Published · cited 1× · 866 F.3d 1072; 2017 WL 3379000; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14490
OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: In 2011, the Secretary of Health ánd Human Services (HHS) implicitly interpreted 42 U.S.C. § 1396(a)(30)(A) (§ 30(A)) to permit approval of a state Medicaid plan rate reduction where the Secretary had not considered evidence comparing beneficiaries’ access to medical services to that of t)ie general public. This appeal
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020-07-28 · Published · cited 0× · 966 F.3d 864
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 7, 2019 Decided July 28, 2020 No. 18-1325 MERITOR, INC., PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of Agency Action of the United States Environmental Protection Agency Catherine E. Stetso
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993-10-06 · Published · cited 27× · 834 F. Supp. 1437; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14402; 1993 WL 399674
834 F.Supp. 1437 (1993) Edward J. CARLOUGH, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Third Party Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-0215. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 6, 1993.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL No. 15-56547 PRESBYTERIAN, a California corporation; KAWEAH DELTA HEALTH D.C. No. CARE DISTRICT, a California Local 2:11-cv-10638- Health Care District; ANAHEIM SVW-MAN MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, a California corporation; LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, a OPINION California corporation; ORANGE COAST MEMORIAL MEDIC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006-10-12 · Published · cited 4× · 36 A.D.3d 34; 822 N.Y.S.2d 871
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state