Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Joanna E Davila”
Oscar Davila Rodriguez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-19-00326-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG OSCAR DAVILA RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
754 F.Supp.2d 351 (2010) Lilliam DAVILA-FELICIANO, Plaintiffs, v. PUERTO RICO STATE INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, et al. Defendants. Civil No. 09-1405 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 6, 2010. *354 Bamily Lopez-Ortiz, Lopez Toro, Law and Notary Offices, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Joanna B. Mato
Rafael Davila Y Benjamin v. Antillas Shipping, Inc.public domain
En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Rafael Dávila y Benjamín Rivera Querellantes-Recurridos Certiorari V. 99TSPR-12 Antilles Shipping, Inc. Querellado-Recurrente Número del Caso: CE-94-682 Abogados de la Parte Peticionaria: Lcda. Joanna Bocanegra Ocasio Abogados de la Parte Recurrida: Lcdo. Luis H. Sánchez Carlo Abogados de la Parte Interventora: Tribunal de
Feliciano v. Puerto Rico State Insurance Fundpublic domain
818 F.Supp.2d 482 (2011) Lilliam Davila FELICIANO, Plaintiff(s), v. PUERTO RICO STATE INSURANCE FUND, et. al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 11-1012 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 13, 2011. *485 Bamily Lopez-Ortiz, Lopez Toro, Law and Notary Offices, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Joanna B. Matos-Hick
Garcia-Gesualdo v. Honeywell Aerospace of P.R., Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1921 LEIKA JOANNA GARCÍA-GESUALDO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. HONEYWELL AEROSPACE OF PUERTO RICO, INC., and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Pedro A
Arditi v. Lighthouse Internationalpublic domain
PRESEA, Chief District Judge, dissenting: The majority’s decision today reaches beyond the squarely presented question of whether Arditi’s claims are preempted by ERISA and in so doing effectively reaches the merits of his underlying state law contract claim against Lighthouse. Because the proper forum for resolving the underlying contract claim is the state court and the majority’s holding eviscerates any dis
Gicharu v. Carrpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1864 SAMUEL KINUTHIA GICHARU, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DONNA CARR, in her capacity as Chief Clerk of the Board of Immigration Appeals; JAMES MCHENRY, in his capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review; MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, in his capacity as Inspector General, Civil Rights & Ci
Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2500 ___________________________ Philip Petrone; Stewart Fisher; Jasbir Singh; Brian Pankz, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jason Dewayne Gunn; Ahmad Abdinasir; Adam F. Akhalu; Latoshia Denise Anderson; Derek C. Anglero; Alan Blane Arthur; Christopher A
Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1884 ___________________________ Philip Petrone; Stewart Fisher; Jasbir Singh; Brian Pankz, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jason Dewayne Gunn; Ahmad Abdinasir; Adam F. Akhalu; Latoshia Denise Anderson; Derek C. Anglero; Alan Blane Arthur; Christopher A
United States v. Marcuspublic domain
Judges SOTOMAYOR and WESLEY concur in a separate opinion. PER CURIAM: Defendant-Appellant Glenn Marcus appeals from a September 18, 2007 judgment of conviction and sentence of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Allyne R. Ross, Judge), sentencing defendant principally to a term of 108 months’ imprisonment following conviction after a jury trial of violations of
Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1574 ___________________________ Philip Petrone, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Stewart Fisher, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jasbir Singh, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Brian Pankz, on behalf of
(2008) Justin CACHOLA-BONILLA, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. WYNDHAM EL CONQUISTADOR RESORT & COUNTRY CLUB, Defendant(s). Civil No. 05-2294 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 19, 2008. ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment filed by defendant Wyndh
Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1574 ___________________________ Philip Petrone, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Stewart Fisher, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jasbir Singh, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Brian Pankz, on behalf of
David Wit v. United Behavioral Healthpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WIT; NATASHA WIT; Nos. 20-17363 BRIAN MUIR; BRANDT PFEIFER, 21-15193 on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer; LORI D.C. No. 3:14- FLANZRAICH, on behalf of her cv-02346-JCS daughter Casey Flanzraich; CECILIA HOLDNAK, on behalf of herself, her daughter Emily Holdnak; GARY ORDER AND ALEXANDE
Collazo v. County of Suffolkpublic domain
*34MEMORANDUM & ORDER Joanna Seybert, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Plaintiff Maria Collazo (“Plaintiff’ or “Collazo”) commenced this action alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000 et. seq. (“Title VII”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) in connection with discrimination and retaliation based
Sexton v. Panel Processing, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DECLINING JURISDICTION OYER PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIM THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. Section § 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1140, protects an employee who “has given information ... in any inquiry or proceeding relating to [ERISA].” The question in this case is whether § 510 ext
Arditi v. Lighthouse Int'lpublic domain
11-423-cv Arditi v. Lighthouse Int'l UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 (Argued: August 25, 2011 Decided: February 9, 2012 Amended: March 9, 2012) Docket No. 11-423-cv ARIES ARDITI, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Belen Garza v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00059-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Belen Garza v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-09-00059-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG BELEN GARZA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 105th District Court
Rivera v. Hillardpublic domain
Filed 3/29/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR JOANNA RIVERA, A163818 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Marin County Super. Ct. Nos. FL1903763, DAVID HILLARD,