Cases

PAULSON, Justice. Debra Daugherty [Debra] appeals from an order of the Stutsman County Court dated February 9, 1983, requiring that she be hospitalized and treated at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period of not to exceed ninety days. We affirm. Prior to her present commitment, Debra was attending therapy sessions at the North Central Human Service Center in Minot. The evidence reflects that during th

Memorandum Opinion DIANE WEISS SIGMUND, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the Motion for Contempt of Automatic Stay (the “Motion”) filed by the Debtor against the Philadelphia Parking Authority (“PPA”). An evi-dentiary hearing at which only the Debtor testified was held on March 14, 2006 to supplement the Stipulation of Facts filed on March 13, 2006. As the pre-hearing briefs that were filed did

806 P.2d 744 (1991) Anthony ANTON and Judi Anton, as representatives for Perry Anton, their child, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Allan P. THOMAS, M.D., Defendant and Appellee. No. 880658-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. February 12, 1991. *745 B. Ray Zoll (argued), Tom D. Branch, James C. Daugherty, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs an

FINE, J. ¶ 1. This appeal concerns the Village of Brown Deer's street-improvement plan for part of the Village. As material to this appeal, Brown Deer contended that it could improve the streets at issue, without paying eminent-domain compensation because, the Village asserted, the projected improvements were *668on public highways within the purview of Wis. Stat. § 82.31

306 F.Supp. 516 (1969) Joann WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff, v. Robert Frank WILLIAMSON, Defendant. Civ. No. 68-453. United States District Court W. D. Oklahoma. December 5, 1969. James M. Little, of Conner, Little & Conner, O. A. Cargill, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff. George Pendell, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant. DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

PAINTER, J. |!Henry A. Bernat (Henry), nephew of the testator, Frank Bernat (Bernat), appeals the trial court’s judgment interpreting the testator’s will as leaving equal shares to each of the eleven legatees. On appeal, Henry asserts that the will was null as to form and, alternatively, that the trial court erred in making a decision about the provisions of the will without having read it, erred in allowing parole evidence

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION1 ARTHUR I. HARRIS, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on the Chapter 7 trustee’s amended objection to the debtor’s claim of exemption (Docket # 17) and the debtor’s response (Docket # 33). At issue is whether Ohio Revised Code §§ 2329.66(A)(6)(c) and 3917.05 permit the debtor to exempt the proceeds of a group life insurance policy

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City of Hannibal’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [ECF No. 41]. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Plaintiffs Jacob and Sarah Blair (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Class Action Complaint in this Court on August 25,

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE ABRAMSON Two sets of Harlan County landowners, the Bakers1 and certain heirs (together with their spouses) of Chester Jackson (the “Jackson heirs”)2 jointly brought suit in Harlan Circuit Court seeking, among other things, damages'and a declaration of their rights under oil and gas leases executed in 2004 with Daugherty

[Cite as Dahmen v. Black, 2018-Ohio-3538.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO ROBERT DAHMEN, et al., : OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, : CASE NO. 2018-T-0021 - vs - : KATHERINE BLACK, et al.,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RONNIE L. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ' This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of St. Peters, Missouri’s Mot tion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 57). The motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition. I. Background Plaintiffs Gina Thompson and Karen McCabe (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Class Action Complaint in this Court on

935 N.E.2d 253 (2010) Victor J. BANDINI, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Joann M. BANDINI, Appellee-Respondent. No. 49A04-1001-DR-26. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 8, 2010. *255 William O. Harrington, Harrington Law P.C., Danville, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Russell T. Clarke, Jr., Emswiller, Williams, Noland & Clarke

Filed 10/23/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE TIBURON/BELVEDERE RESIDENTS UNITED TO SUPPORT THE TRAILS, A157073 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Marin County v. Super. Ct. No. CIV 1703276) MARTHA COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent.

RULING AND ORDER Re: BENCH TRIAL HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior U.S. District Judge On November 15,2016, the above matter commenced in a bench trial before this Court. Plaintiff Greg Martin (“Plaintiff’) filed this Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) disability benefits action against Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”), Federal Express Corporation Short Term Disabili

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER RULE 9019 AND AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF ASSETS UNDER 11 U.S.C. § 363 JOSEPH M. SCOTT, JR., Bankruptcy Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Joint Motion to Settle and Compro*325mise and Authorizing Transfer of Assets under 11 U.S.C. § 363 (the “Settlement Motion”) (Bk. Doc

637 F.3d 508 (2011) In re FAMILY DOLLAR FLSA LITIGATION. Irene Grace; Sharron Daugherty; John A. Gertken; Dusty G. Hylton; Lasandra B. Rose; Phillis Fancher; Jodi Hare; Angela J. Cooper; Melvin Cathey; Mark Clark; John E. Gersch; Margie A. Little; Vicki Brown Guy; Brenda Kay Russell, a/k/a Brenda K. Russell-Stain; Barbara G. Brown; Marcella San Giorgio; Brian K. Backlund; James Manos; Arlene Atkins; Tracy Kloppe; Sandra Carney; Catherine M. Dawson; A

142 F.Supp.2d 1338 (2001) JOHN ALDEN HOMES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Ken KANGAS, Joanne Kangas, Garry Muth, Defendants. No. 2:99-CV-396-FTM-DNF. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. April 27, 2001. *1339 John Pope Harllee, III, Harllee, Porges, Hamlin, Knowles, Bald & Prouty, P.A., Bradenton, FL, R. Eri

ALMON H. MAUS, Senior Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The resolution of this proceeding in prohibition involves the construction and application of the Peer Review Statute, RSMo § 537.035. The provisions of the statute directly relative to this proceeding are: • MoRS § 537.035.4 “Except as otherwise provided in this section, the proceedings, findings, deliberations, report

922 A.2d 343 (2006) 50 Conn.Sup. 283 Francis ESPOSITO, Executor (Estate of Anthony Esposito) v. CPM INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. Anthony Esposito, Executor (Estate of Joanne Esposito) v. CPM Insurance Services, Inc. Nos. CV04-4010919S, CV04-4010920S. Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of New Haven. February 9, 2006.

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge. Appellant appeals a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that she failed to prove that she sustained a work-related injury. She argues that the premises exception to the going and coming rule applies and the Commission erred in denying benefits. We agree and reverse. On appeal in workers’ compensation cases, we view the evid