Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 22-096 (CKK) LAUREN HANDY, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 22, 2023) On October 22, 2020, a group of pro-life activists forced entry into a reproductive

12/12/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 21, 2018 JOAN ELIZABETH HALL v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln County No. S9600017 Forest A. Durard, Jr., Judge __________________________________

OPINION Opinion by Justice FILLMORE. In this interlocutory appeal, Pilot Travel Centers, LLC (Pilot Travel) asserts the trial court erred by denying its motion to compel arbitration and for a stay of the trial court proceedings against it. We reverse the trial court’s order denying Pilot Travel’s motion to compel arbitration and for

LYNN, J. The plaintiffs, Alfred and Susan Marshall, appeal an order of the Superior Court {Honran, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants1 on the plaintiffs’ claim to a prescriptive easement over defendants’ beach front property (the “Beach Lot”) on Lake Ossipee. We reverse and remand. The summary judgment record reveals the following pertinent facts. The

785 F.Supp. 1227 (1992) Margaret CROSBY v. Joan CROSBY, et al. Civ. No. Y-90-2513. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 18, 1992. Richard J. Hackerman, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Michael L. Marshall, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Joan Crosby. Denis L. Casey, Washington, D.C., for defendant Gen. Motors Corp. James Frederick Bromle

769 F.Supp. 197 (1991) Margaret CROSBY v. Joan CROSBY. Civ. A. No. Y 90-2513. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 1, 1991. *198 Richard J. Hakerman, Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Michael L. Marshall, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Joan Crosby. Denis L. Casey, Washington, D.C., for defendant General Mot

Opinion by Judge Alarcon; Dissent by Judge Ferguson ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge. Somphalavanh Sophanthavong appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Sophanthavong contends that the district court erred in denying his claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth and F

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED AUGUST SESSION, 1998 January 28, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9710-CC-00503 ) Appellee, ) )

103 F.Supp.2d 749 (2000) Robert O. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. Roy HENDRICKS, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison, and John J. Farmer, Attorney General of New Jersey, Respondents. Civil Action No. 97-5618(JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 23, 2000. *750 *751

*641OPINION OF THE COURT Joan B. Lefkowitz, J. Defendant Richard Marshall moves to dismiss the complaint for plaintiffs failure to comply with CPLR 306-b (a) because service of process was not made on him within 120 days of the filing thereof. Plaintiff cross-moves for a nunc pro tune order of filing. The codefendants were served wi

OPINION OF THE COURT George D. Marlow, J. Petitioner in this summary proceeding is a “mobile home park owner” within the meaning of section 233 (subd a, par 2) of the Real Property Law and seeks to recover possession of a rental unit occupied by respondent, a “mobile home tenant” as that phrase is defined in section 233 (subd a, par 1) of the Real Property Law. There is no dispute that

307 F.3d 36 Robert O. MARSHALL, Appellantv.Roy L. HENDRICKS*, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison; John J. Farmer*, Attorney General, State of New Jersey* Caption amended per Court's Order of 8/8/00 No. 00-9004. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued March 21, 2002. Filed September 11, 2002.

O’HERN, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. With two exceptions, I agree with the comprehensive opinion and judgment of the Court dismissing defendant’s petition for post-conviction relief (PCR). I dissent from the Court’s denial of a hearing to defendant on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, and I dissent from its denial of access to the State’s investig

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Robert O. Marshall unsuccessfully appealed his sentence of death in the New Jersey courts. He then sought habeas corpus relief in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and having been denied relief there, he has appealed to our court. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm the Dis

208 B.R. 768 (1997) In re Gretel A. HARTMAN, Debtor. J. Christopher MARSHALL, United States Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Lee BOURQUE and Credit and Debt Consulting of America, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-14873-JNF, Adversary No. 96-1472. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Eastern Division. April 30, 1997. *769

OPINION KEITH, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of preliminary injunction, enjoining the enforcement of Canon VII(C)(6) of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Suster and Clearly, cross-appeal the district court’s denial of preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of Canon VII(C)(8) of the Ohio Judicial Code of Conduct. For the reasons set fort

149 F.3d 523 Ronald SUSTER; Patricia Cleary,Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants (96-4115),Beth Smith; Jack Durkin; Robert Lisotto; Stuart Saferin;Christopher A. Boyko; Gail Rose Kane; Timothy P.Maloney, Intervenors-Appellees,v.Jonathan W. MARSHALL; Robin G. Weaver; David T. Evans;Thomas J. Moyer, Chief Justice; Andrew Douglas; AliceRobie Resnick; Francis E. Sweeney; Paul E. Pfeifer;Deborah L. Cook;

OPINION OF THE COURT Cardona, P.J. During an evening in November 1999, two masked men entered a restaurant in the Town of Ulster, Ulster County, and stole money from two cash registers after striking and tying up the manager. The pair then drove off in the manager’s car. Following an investigation, the police arrested a former employee of the restaurant, Justo Rolon, who admitted his involvement as a look-ou

845 P.2d 424 (1993) Reverend Samuel MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Reverend Neil MUNRO, Appellee. No. S-4548. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 29, 1993. *425 Edgar Paul Boyko, Boyko & Flansburg, P.C., Anchorage, for appellant. James M. Powell and Valli L. Goss, Hughes, Thorsness, Gantz, Powell & Brundin, Anchorage, for ap

TYSON, Judge. *648 *175 Defendants appeal from an order granting Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment and entry of judgment for liability and permanent injunction in favor of Plaintiff