Cases

August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 03/22/2022 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:20:03 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana The Clerk of the Court has notified this Court that certain attorneys have failed either to pay the annual registration fee required for them to be licensed to practice law in Indiana or to file an exemption affidavit as contemplated by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2, and/or have failed to make the IOLTA certification required by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 2(f). In additi

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi

325 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2004) Sanquita Chyverne ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE and Dr. Laurel Blackwell, etc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:03cv192-T. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 9, 2004. *1275 *1276 Afrika C. Parchman, Ter

272 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2003) Linda AKEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-382BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 21, 2003. *1113 *1114 *1115 *1116

JUSTICE REGNIER delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Appellants filed an action in the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Montana University System’s policy prohibiting employees from receiving dependent insurance coverage for their same-sex domestic partners violates their rights under the Montana Co

Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register (2025 NY Slip Op 01717) Matter of Attorneys Who are in Violation of Judiciary Law Section 468-a for Failing to Register 2025 NY Slip Op 01717 Decided on March 20, 2025 Appellate Di

OPINION OF THE COURT MANSMANN, Circuit Judge. In this matter growing out of the 1979 incident at the Three Mile Island nuclear facility near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, we are asked once again to resolve a confrontation between an assertion of federal jurisdiction over public liability actions by defendants and a challenge to that jurisdiction by plaintiffs who wish to be in the state court system. We previou

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF : No. 171 MM 2014 ATTORNEY GENERAL, : : Petitioner : : : v. : : : SUPERVISING JUDGE OF THE THIRTY- : FIFTH STATEWIDE INVESTIGATI

ORDER GRANTING SHELL’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART¡ DOW’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING DOLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT TV KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is Shell Oil Company’s, Shell Petroleum Inc.’s, Shell Chemical Company’s, and She

903 F.Supp. 532 (1995) The STATE OF NEW YORK, by Attorney General Dennis C. VACCO, et al., Plaintiff, v. REEBOK INTERNATIONAL LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 95 Civ. 3143 (JGK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 20, 1995. Pamela Jones Harbour, Joseph Opper, Linda J. Gargiulo, Assistant Attorneys General, New York City, for State of New York and loca

90 B.R. 808 (1988) In re AMERICAN SOLAR KING CORP., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 6-86-00527. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas, Waco Division. September 1, 1988. *809 *810 *811 *812 Benjamin Harvey, Waco, Tex., for American S

OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme

ACCEPTED 14-15-00178-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/21/2015 11:31:57 AM

301 S.E.2d 129 (1983) John T. McKENZIE, Jr., et al. v. CITY OF HIGH POINT. No. 8218SC407. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 5, 1983. *130 Herbert L. Hyde, Asheville, for petitioners-appellants. Knox Walker, High Point, for respondent-appellee. WELLS, Judge. Part Three of chapter 160A of the General St