Cases

PER CURIAM: The petitioners, Wayne A. Lemasters and Mary Joan Lemasters, appeal the May 16, 2012, order of the Circuit Court of Marshall County that denied attorney fees, costs and expenses incurred in the prosecution of bad faith allegations against the respondent, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”). In this order, the court awarded attorney fees, costs and expenses pursuant to our holding in Hayseeds, Inc

George W. Draper III, Judge HeplerBroom, LLC, and one of its partners, Glenn E. Davis (hereinafter and collectively, "Relators"), seek a writ of prohibition to prevent the circuit court from taking any further action other than ordering a legal malpractice action instituted by Donald, Dolores, and Michael Twillman (hereinafter, "Plaintiffs") to be transferred from St. Louis City to St.

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION ONE JAMES K. DAVIS, ) No. ED107835 ) Appellant, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. )

OPINION KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Diane Davis appeals from the district court’s orders allowing the federal government to enforce its tax lien and sell the real property owned by Diane Davis and her tax-delinquent husband. Diane Davis, who does not owe any unpaid taxes, argues that the district court should have allowed the government to sell on

SCHOELEN, Judge: The appellant, Frederick C. Gazelle, through counsel, appeals a March 18, 2014, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board denied entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(s)(l) (allowing for SMC when a claimant has a total disability rating plus an “additional service-connected disability or disabilities indepe

307 Ga. 276 FINAL COPY S19Z1117. IN THE MATTER OF JOAN PALMER DAVIS. PER CURIAM. On February 27, 2012, this Court disbarred Joan Palmer Davis based on findings of misconduct arising from her representation of clients in two separate disciplinary proceedings. See In the Matter of Davis, 290 Ga. 857 (725 SE2d 216) (2012). On April 19, 2017, Davis filed with the Office of Bar Admissions an Application for Certification of Fitness to Practice Law to be reinstated to the pract

Motion for reargument, clarification or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Smith, Centra and Pine, JJ.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JOAN NARVESEN and ) EDWIN NARVESEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0531-LM ) JOHN ANTHONY PALMER and ) JENNIFER M. BARKER, as individuals,

Motion for writ of error coram nobis and for other relief denied. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Smith, Centra and Pine, JJ.

PER CURIAM: In this case, Petitioner David A. Wallace appeals the January 20, 2012 order of the Circuit Court of Summers County that ruled after a bench trial that Respondents Joan Pack, Dario Pack, Dello Pack, Don Pack, Delso Pack, and Minnie Harris acquired a 28-acre tract of land through adverse possession. This Court finds no error below, and we affirm the circuit court’s orde

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant, v. JOAN SCHOEFF, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JAMES EDWARD SCHOEFF, deceased, Appellee. No. 4D13-1765 [November 4, 2015] Appeal and cr

321 S.W.3d 213 (2010) Joe B. GULLEY Jr. and Imelda Gulley, Appellants, v. Wirt DAVIS, II, individually, Catherine B. Taylor, individually, Valley Oak Investments, L.P., Camilla R. Blaffer and Texas Gulf Bank, N.A., Co-Trustees of The Camilla B. Mallard Trust, Joan B. Johnson and Bessemer Trust Co., Co-Trustees of The Joan B. Johnson Trust, and PDB Properties, Ltd., Appellees. No. 01-08-00572-CV. Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to prohibit respondents from proceeding with the underlying criminal action in the Livingston County Court. It is hereby ordered that the petition be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: While an indictment was pending against

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, July 15, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26D0614. JOAN DAVIS v. BANK OZK. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 23A5239 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlan

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2017 WY 24 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2016 March 3, 2017 ANADARKO LAND CORPORATION f/k/a UNION PACIFIC LAND RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Nebraska Corporation, and THREE SISTERS, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company, Appellants (Defendants),

DAVIS, Judge: U.S. Army veteran James A. Halcomb appeals through counsel from a December 19, 2006, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied entitlement to compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for loss of vision in the left eye. The issue before the Court is whether the appellant has established that VA’s care and treatment proximately caused an additional qu

*1275 KITE, Chief Justice. [T1] After Joan M. Marusich died, the State of Wyoming ex rel. Department of Health, Office of Healthcare Finance ing/Equalityeare (Department) filed a lien against the home she owned with her husband, William Marusich, as tenants by the entirety. The Department sought to rec

STEINBERG, Judge: On February 12, 2001, the appellant, then pro se, sought review of a June 9, 2000, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that dismissed as untimely *31 an attempted appeal of a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) regional office (RO) decision that had denied an original

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 04-2386 DWAYNE A. MOORE , APPELLANT , V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON , SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided May 15, 2007

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts IV and V of the DISCUSSION. [EDITORS' NOTE: PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULES 976(b) AND 976.1 THIS OPINION IS CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION. THE SHADED TEXT BELOW REPRESENTS THE ORIGINAL OPINION AND IS PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTA