Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jiron v. No Named”
v. Jironpublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Jiron ex rel. Jiron v. Rio Grande Countypublic domain
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Michael Jirón filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in federal district court on behalf of his daughter, Christina Jirón. See 28 U.S.C. § 2242 (“Application for a writ of habeas corpus shall be in writing and signed and verified by the person for whose relief is intended or by someone acting in his behalf.”). The
Jiron v. United Statespublic domain
Frivolous lawsuits; Jurisdiction; Motion to Dismiss, RCFC 12(b)(1); Pro Se; RCFC 58 (masters). MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER BRADEN, Judge. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND. 1 On September 26, 2012, a jury in the Fremont County D
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VAZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Doc. 4] and Third-Party Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the United States of America as Third-Party Defendant Pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(1), 28 U.S.C. or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment [Doc. 12]. The Court, having considered the motion, brief
Michael Edward Jiron v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________<
State v. Jironpublic domain
683 So.2d 769 (1996) STATE of Louisiana v. Roger JIRON. No. 96-KA-319. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 1, 1996. *770 Bruce G. Whittaker, Staff Appellate Counsel, 24th Judicial District, Indigent Defender Board, Gretna, for Appellant. Jack M. Capella, District Attorney and Leigh Anne Wall, Assistant Dis
State v. Jironpublic domain
882 P.2d 685 (1994) STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Joe F. JIRON, Defendant and Appellant. No. 930640-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. September 27, 1994. *687 Steven B. Killpack, Provo, for appellant. Jan Graham and Kris C. Leonard, Salt Lake City, for appellee. Before BILLINGS, JACKSON and ORME, JJ.
Jiron v. Sperry Rand Corp.(Sperry-Univac)public domain
423 F.Supp. 155 (1975) Mary T. JIRON et al., Plaintiffs, v. SPERRY RAND CORPORATION (SPERRY-UNIVAC), a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. C 74-274. United States District Court, D. Utah, C. D. February 14, 1975. *156 *157 David K. Robinson, George C. Morris, Jay W. Mitton, Salt Lake City, Ut
*1132MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROBSON, Senior District Judge. This cause is before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss and for a more definite statement. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part, and the motions for a more definite statement are denied. This action is
State v. Christopher LaFountainpublic domain
Note: In the case title, an asterisk (*) indicates an appellant and a double asterisk (**) indicates a cross-appellant. VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 24-AP-314 109 State Street Montpelier VT 05609-0801 802-828-4774 www.vermontjudiciary.org ENTRY ORDER NOVEMBER TERM, 2024 State of Vermont v. Christopher LaFountain* } APPEALED FROM:
Andrew Huerta v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-24-00119-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ANDREW HUERTA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 347TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, T
Gmi v. Asoc. Futbolpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 26, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D15-1678 Lower Tribunal No. 14-21682 ________________ GMI, LLC, etc., App
Rodgers v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims MELODY J. RODGERS, Plaintiff, No. 21-cv-00793 v. Filed: April 30, 2021 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Melody J. Rodgers, Jacksonville, NC, pro se. Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Acting Director, Robert E. Kirs
State v. William Schenkpublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2018 VT 45
Pautsch v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACOB PAUTSCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-3859 (JEB) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The remaining Plaintiffs here are seven servicemembers and civilian contractors, as well as two of their family members, who sued the Is
Pautsch v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JACOB PAUTSCH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-3859 (JEB) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The remaining Plaintiffs here are seven servicemembers and civilian contractors, as well as two of their family members, who sued the Is
Robinson v. United Statespublic domain
Pro Se Complaint; Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Claim for constitutional violations; Not in Interest of Justice to Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1631. PATRICIA E. CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge ORDER I. Background On April 25, 2016, Mr. Arthur Ray Robinson filed suit against officials withi
Jones v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOUGLAS JONES, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 21-836 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 41 : DISTRICT O
Hernandez v. Ellinspublic domain
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts I, II and VIII of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and for Qualified Immunity and Memorandum in Support Thereof [Doc. 24]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, and relevant law, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is well-taken and will be granted. BACK
Goodall v. Williamspublic domain
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Docket No. 2] filed by plaintiffs Melissa Renee Goodall, Jeremy Wayde Goodall, Shauna Leigh Arrington, Jeffery Phillip Arrington, Karla Jo Kroeker, Ryan Mark Tipple, Rep. Douglas Lamborn, and Lamborn for Congress. Plaintiffs ask the Court to issue a mandatory preliminary injunction requiring defendant Wayne W.