Cases

NO. 12-18-00031-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JAMES FULTON, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

241 P.3d 255 (2010) 2010 OK CIV APP 84 Brenda FULTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PEOPLE LEASE CORPORATION and Mark Findley, Defendants/Appellees, and Ervin Findley Trucking, Inc., Defendant. No. 106,675. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. March

854 So.2d 1010 (2003) Kathy BURNETT and Phillip Burnett v. Dr. Lori FULTON. No. 2000-CA-01241-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. September 18, 2003. *1011 John F. Hawkins and Steven Mark Wann, Jackson, for appellants. Jimmy B. Wilkins, Mildred M. Morris, and Susan Latham Steffey, Jackson, for appellee. EN BANC.

OPINION RONALD L. WALKER, Chief Justice. This is a wrongful death suit. James Fulton, his wife Dorothy Fulton, and Diane Daigle, who was acting as next friend of Monica Page, a minor, sued Steven Allen Page for damages resulting from the death of his wife, Kathy Page. The jury found Steven Page killed Kathy Page, and awarded damages to Kathy Page’s parents and minor child. The five points of error raised in

Branch, Judge. On this pro se appeal from the trial court’s grant of a writ of possession as to defendant John Ware’s mobile home to plaintiff Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, Inc., Ware argues that the trial court erred when it granted the writ as part of a final judgment without taking account of his previous payments to Vanderbilt and when it dismissed his counterclaims. Although we conclude that the trial court did not

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. In this appeal, Jimmy Lee Jones maintains that he is entitled to relief from his child molestation conviction. Additionally, he claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion for the appointment of appellate counsel. For reasons that follow, we affirm the denial of the motion for appellate counsel, and dismiss the remainder of this appeal. In 1995, in the Superior Court of C

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips and the briefs and arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deput

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2024-CA-00521-COA JIMMIE NELL LONG APPELLANT v. JONES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, BY AND APPELLEE THROUGH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/02/2024 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAL WILLIAMSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY

Bernes, Judge. The juvenile court found that the father of K. C. W. suffered from a mental deficiency rendering him incapable of caring for the child on his own and terminated his parental rights. The father appeals, contending that the juvenile court relied upon an improper ground for granting the termination and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in several respects.1 For the reasons dis

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: This case involves various claims of race discrimination brought by eighteen current and former Fulton County Sheriffs Department employees individually and on behalf of all similarly situated white employees of the Sheriffs Department against Fulton County, Georgia and Sheriff Jacquelyn H. Barrett, in her official and individual capacities (collectively, “De

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2000-CA-01241-SCT KATHY BURNETT AND PHILLIP BURNETT v. DR. LORI FULTON DATE OF JUDGMENT: 3/23/2000 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES E. GRAVES, JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: JOHN F. HAWKINS STEVEN MARK WANN ATTORNEY

656 S.E.2d 272 (2008) OFC CAPITAL v. SCHMIDTLEIN ELECTRICAL INC. et al. No. A07A1636. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 9, 2008. *273 Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti, Bret T. Thrasher, Jimmy C. Luke II, Norcross, for appellant. Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, Jeffrey A. Daxe, Marietta, for appellees. SM

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR

589 S.E.2d 731 (2003) Lorraine KEENER, William McMillen and wife, Mildred McMillen, Fred Forsyth and wife, Teddy Forsyth, Frank Dawson and wife, Penelope L. Dawson, Jimmy Goodman, and Jane Moore, Plaintiffs, v. William ARNOLD and wife, Sharon Arnold, Defendants. No. COA02-1445. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 16, 2003. *732

614 F.2d 940 22 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 59, 22 Empl. Prac.Dec. P 30,625Jimmie H. WOODSON, Appellant,v.Jack M. FULTON, etc., et al., Appellees. Nos. 79-1003, 79-1009. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 8, 1979.Decided Feb. 7, 1980. George Wm. Warren, IV, Richmond, Va. (Francis,

626 S.E.2d 541 (2006) 277 Ga. App. 350 GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al. v. HIGDON et al. No. A05A2084. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 24, 2006. *542 Mills & Moss, David C. Moss, Paul J. Dzikowski, Lawrenceville, for appellants. McCamy, Phillips, Tuggle & Fordham, Charles L.

McMurray, Presiding Judge. In connection with petitions alleging their delinquency for acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the offense of criminal damage to property in the second degree, the children M. C. and M. W. stipulated they participated in an unlawful entry to vacant residential property where intentional property damage was committed, but contested the contention that property damage caused there

Barnes, Judge. The juvenile court found that N. A. committed the offense of fornication and therefore was delinquent. N. A. appeals, contending that the juvenile court erred in denying her motion to dismiss because a child who is 12 years old cannot consent to and therefore commit the crime of fornication. N. A. further contends that the court erred in allowing N. A.’s statement to be entered into evidence. We affirm.

Fletcher, Chief Justice, concurring specially. I would hold that a defendant is entitled to cross-examine his co-indictee about the co-indictee’s plea of guilty. Therefore, I respectfully disagree with Division 2 of the majority opinion. 1. The exclusion of testimony about a co-indictee’s guilty plea runs afoul of a defendant’s right of confrontation. This Court is

PER CURIAM. Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 30