Cases

511 S.E.2d 180 (1999) 270 Ga. 441 BUTLER v. The STATE. Langston v. The State. White v. The State. Nos. S98A1738, S98A1739, S98A1742. Supreme Court of Georgia. January 19, 1999. *182 Johnson, Prioleau & Lynch, Theodore Johnson, Atlanta, for appellant (case no. S98A1738). D

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge, with whom REAVLEY, POLITZ, TATE, JOHNSON and JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges join, dissenting from Part III of the opinion and the judgment of the Court: The majority refused to determine an injured worker’s status as a crew member on the basis of what he was doing when he was injured, but insists that his status must be decided on the basis of what he did in the past, and ho

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the motion of defendants Wyeth, Inc. fik/a American Home Products and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. fik/a Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively Wyeth) for summary judgment. Plaintiff Jeanette Byrd has responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ERNESTO MANUEL GONZALEZ, No. 64249 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. DEC 3 1 2015 Tfic; IE

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. This is a Section 1983 case in which the Plaintiff, Lashunda Adams, alleges that a police officer, W.L. May, arrested her without probable cause and used excessive force during the arrest. Adams sued May and May’s employer, the City of Newton. Before the Court is the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Court, having consid

131 Nev., Advance Opinion 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ERNESTO MANUEL GONZALEZ, No. 64249 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. DEC 3 1 2015 Tfic; IE

943 A.2d 230 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. George E. BANKS, Appellee In re George E. Banks, Appeal of Mary Yelland, as Next Friend. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. George E. Banks, Appellee (Two Cases). No. 2 EAP 2006, No. 461 CAP, No. 5 EAP 2006, No. 505 CAP Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted February 13, 2007.

366 F.Supp. 1224 (1973) James FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. Leon J. VINCENT, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional Facility, et al., Defendants. No. 72 Civ. 4759. United States District Court, S. D. New York. November 19, 1973. *1225 Jethro M. Eisenstein, Richard Blaker, Law Student, New York City, for plaintiff. Louis J. Lef

144 S.E.2d 121 (1965) 265 N.C. 373 Jethro MIDGETT, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. Mattie MIDGETT v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. No. 33. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 29, 1965. *122 Frank B. Aycock, Jr., and Robert B. Lowry, Elizabeth City, for plaintif

369 Pa. Superior Ct. 133 (1987) 535 A.2d 86 In re SPANG INDUSTRIES, INC. APPEAL OF SPANG INDUSTRIES, INC. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 29, 1987. Filed November 23, 1987. Reargument Denied January 7, 1988. *135 Paul A. Manion, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Before CIRILLO, Pre

PER CURIAM. Tavares David Calloway was convicted of five counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Derwin Copeland, Frederick McGuire, Adolphus Melvin, Gary St. Charles, and Trenton Thomas, along with armed robbery, armed kidnapping, and armed burglary with an assault or battery. A jury recommended a sentence of death for each count of first-degree murder by a vote of seve

VILLEMEZ, Judge: Pursuant to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, of wrongful appropriation, making and uttering a worthless check, and depositing obscene matter in the mail, in violation of Articles 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 934. The sentence awarded was confinement for 18 months, reduction to pay grade E-l, forfeiture of all pay

586 N.E.2d 847 (1992) Douglas REAVES, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 15S00-8806-CR-533. Supreme Court of Indiana. February 17, 1992. *850 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana and M.E. Tuke, Deputy Public Defender, Indianapolis, for appellant. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana and Gary Damon

353 Mass. 740 (1968) 235 N.E.2d 36 HENRIETTA B. BROWN vs. CITY OF BOSTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 7, 1968. March 5, 1968. Present: WILKINS, C.J., SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, & KIRK, JJ. William H. Kerr for the defendant. Robert L. Wise for the plaintiff. CUTTER, J.

46 Cal.Rptr.3d 7 (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 110 Richard K. GOTTLIEB, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. Michael KEST, Individually and as Trustee, etc., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. No. B178729. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One. July 10, 2006. *11 Tesser &a;

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1019 JOYCE MCKIVER; DELOIS LEWIS; DAPHNE MCKOY; ALEXANDRIA MCKOY; ANTONIO KEVIN MCKOY; ARCHIE WRIGHT, JR.; TAMMY LLOYD; DEBORAH JOHNSON; ETHEL DAVIS; PRISCILLA DUNHAM, Plaintiffs - Appellees, and DENNIS MCKIVER, JR.; LAJUNE JESSUP; DON LLOY

The question is whether a claim filed by Myrtle B. Matson with the administrator of the estate of Lauren C. Matson, deceased, was barred by the statute of limitation. The facts are substantially as follows: On August 20, 1922, at Wichita, Kansas, Lauren C. Matson, a resident of that state, made, executed, and delivered for a cash consideration to Myrtle B. Matson the claimant, a promissory note for the sum of $7603.39, due one year after date, bearing interest at 7 per cent per annum f

Cornish, J. On September 7, 1912, the plaintiff was injured by a collision between a wagon in which he was riding and an automobile, driven by the defendant Herrick as chauffeur and in which the defendant Gardner was a passenger. The plaintiff’s team was being driven by his father, and was standing near the platform of a store in the town of Hope and about ten feet behind the automobile. Mr. Gardner and others

Cornish, J. This bill in equity was brought to cancel a written contract for the sale of real estate, because of certain alleged false and fraudulent representations on the part of the defendant, the grantor. The contract was made on October 10, 1910. It included seven lots of timberland and the total consideration was to be eighteen thousand five hundred dollars. Separate valuations were placed upon separate

726 S.W.2d 53 (1986) Paul HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 1009-83. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. September 17, 1986. *54 Michael L. Brandes, Austin, for appellant. Ronald Earle, Dist. Atty. and Ralph Graham, Asst. Dist. Atty., Austin, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the