Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-21-00579-CR EX PARTE Eric Uriel SIFUENTES, et al. From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Kinney County, Texas Trial Court No. 5135 Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presid

PER CURIAM. | iPursuant to Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 21, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) has filed a petition seeking the imposition of reciprocal discipline against respondent, Jose W. Vega,1 an attorney *1177licensed to practice law in Louisiana, Texas, and New York, based upon discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of Tex

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

28 F.3d 1430 29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 451 Dennis J. HASTERT, Harris Fawell, John E. Porter, Philip M.Crane, Henry J. Hyde, Robert H. Michel, and ThomasW. Ewing, Plaintiffs-Appellants,andJohnny Scott and Ben Howard, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants,v.ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS, John J.Lanigan, Theresa M. Petrone, Richard A. Cowen, HanneloreHuisman, Lawrence E. Johnson, David E

819 S.W.2d 806 (1991) Rogelio Rangel HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 70979. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. June 5, 1991. Rehearing Overruled September 18, 1991. *809 Teresa A. Hunter, Laredo, for appellant. Joe Rubio, Jr., Dist. Atty., Jose Angel Moreno, Asst. Dist.

ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING MOTIONS TO DECERTIFY CLASS MICHAEL J. SENG, United States Magistrate Judge. On April 19, 2011, the Court granted in part Plaintiffs’ Sabas Arrendondo, Jose Cue-vas, Hilario Gomez, Irma Landeros and Ro-salba Landeros (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion seeking class certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 85.) On March 22, 2013, Defendants f

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. We are asked here to review a decision of a three-judge district court denying attorneys’ fees to certain parties involved in litigation regarding congressional redistricting in Illinois following the 1990 census. We initially decided that we had jurisdiction over the appeals brought by the Hastert, Nieves, Urban League and Scott plaintiffs, but jurisdiction over the Rosebrook appeal only to the exte

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN ANTHONY BERTSCH and JEFFERY LEE HRONIS, Defendants and Appellants. S093944 Sacramento County Superior Court 94F07295 April 20, 2026 Chief Justice Guerrero authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corri