Cases

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2002 TSPR 126 Lcdo. Jesús M. Pérez Félix 157 DPR ____ Número del Caso: TS-6344 Fecha: 23/septiembre/2002 Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico: Lcda. Sheila I. Vélez Martínez Directora Ejecutiva Abogado de la Parte Querellada: Por Derecho Propio Materia: Solicitud de Reinstalación Es

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KINGSLEY CHIN, M.D., and LESS INSTITUTE CLINICAL, PLLC, Appellants, v. JESUS PEREZ, Appellee. No. 4D2023-1395 [December 18, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward Count

José A. Cabranes, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Manuel De Jesus Perez Henriquez ("petitioner" or "Perez") seeks review of an October 7, 2015, decision of the BIA affirming an April 20, 2015, decision of an Immigration Judge ("IJ") ordering his removal. In re Manuel De Jesus Perez Henriquez, No. A036 542 739 (B.I.A. Oct. 7, 2015), aff'g No. A036 542 739 (Immig. Ct. N.Y. City Apr. 20, 2015). Per

Per Curiam. Roberto Jesus Perez challenges the trial court's failure to conduct a competency hearing. His attorney moved to have a psychiatric evaluation performed, which the trial court ordered. A psychiatrist conducted the evaluation and prepared a written report, but nothing in the record shows that a competency hearing was held on the matter, which was error. See e.g. , Moorer v. State ,

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Petitioner, Wayne Vargas de Jesus (“petitioner” or “Vargas”), filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“2255 motion”) on January 19, 2011. ECF No. 1. Petitioner seeks post-conviction relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. at 10-12. Respondent, the United States of Ame

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is an appeal filed by debtor-appellant Ricardo Jesus Rivera Balaguer (“Rivera Balaguer” or “Appellant”), on February 23, 2016, against creditor Johanna Lanza Perez (“Appellee”), and the United States Trustee, as an interested party. Appellant specifically appealed the Order denying the motion for reconsid

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. Presently before the court is the appeal by Sitka Enterprises, Inc., Berrios & Lon-go Law Offices, P.S.C., and Fernando E. Longo-Quinones (“Appellants”) of an order issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico (Docket No. 15-2), transferring Adversary Case No. 09-150(BKT), to the U.S. District Court. The issue

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50314 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:22-cr-01581- GPC-2 JESUS PEREZ GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50316 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50314 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:22-cr-01581- GPC-2 JESUS PEREZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo

OPINION AND ORDER GIERBOLINI, Chief Judge. The plaintiffs in both cases filed motions on October 23, 1992, to consolidate their § 1983 civil rights actions under Rule 42(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. The defendants had hither to filed a Motion to Dismiss on September 8, 1992, which the plaintiffs opposed on September 15,1992. The defendants’ motion asserts that the plaintiffs’ civil rights complaint is time barred. For t

558 F.3d 50 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jesus PEREZ-CRUZ, a/k/a Indio, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1834. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard December 2, 2008. Decided February 25, 2009. *51 Hector L. Ramos-Vega, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with whom Joseph C. Laws, Jr.,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-2304 _____________________________ ROBERTO JESUS PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County. Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge. April 17, 2019 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMA

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII JESÚS MORENO REVISIÓN PÉREZ ADMINISTRATIVA Procedente del Recurrente Departamento de Corrección y v. KLRA202500200 Rehabilitació

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XII Revisión Administrativa Procedente de la GUILLERMO DE JESÚS Comisión de PÉREZ Investigación,

(2007) Juan B. PEREZ-SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. PUBLIC BUILDING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 05-1396(FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 26, 2007. AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiffs Juan B. Perez Sanchez, Rosa Vega Padro, their conjugal partnership, and their d

(2007) Juan B. PEREZ-SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. PUBLIC BUILDING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants, Civil No. 05-1396(FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 12, 2007. OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiffs Juan B. Perez-Sanchez, Rosa Vega-Padro, their conjugal partnership, and their daughter, Valerie Perez-Vega

OPINION Opinion by Justice BENAVIDES. By nine issues, appellant Jesus Perez Saldaña challenges his convictions for one count of indecency with a child by contact, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1) (Vernon 2003), and two counts of aggravated sexual assault, Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021(a) (Vernon Supp.2007). The trial court sentenced S

402 F.Supp.2d 393 (2005) Juan B. Perez SANCHEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC BUILDING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 05-1396(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 29, 2005. *394 *395 Ariel Hernandez-Santana, Jesus M. Hernandez-Sanchez, Hernandez Sanchez Law Fir

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL1 SUCESIÓN DE ELIGIO Apelación PÉREZ DE JESÚS procedente del compuesta por ELIGIO DE Tribunal de JESÚS PÉREZ VARGAS, Primera Instancia, ISABEL ALTAGRACIA PÉREZ Sala Superior de VARGAS, ROSA MAGALY San Juan PÉREZ VARGAS, ANA FELICIA PÉREZ VARGAS,

OPINION OF THE COURT GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. ■I. INTRODUCTION This appeal is concerned with the ripeness doctrine, a constitutional mandate derived from Article Ill’s requirement that federal courts hear only cases or controversies. U.S. Const., Art. Ill, § 2. The doctrine assists courts in avoiding the need to address speculative cas