Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jesus Guzman”
United States v. Jesus Guzman-Reyespublic domain
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Jesus Guzman-Reyes appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and illegal reentry into the United States. Specifically, Guzman challenges the district court’s assessment of the U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(12) enhancement for maintaining a premises for the purpose of drug distribution, as well as the § 3Bl.l(c) enhan
Jesus Guzman v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-03-678-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI
Jesus Guzman v. Statepublic domain
NUMBER 13-03-678-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS <
Jose Jesus Guzman v. Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-03-00548-CR Jose Jesus GUZMAN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
Curipoma, Jesus Alberto Guzmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0159-22 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY Per curiam.
Order entered November 15, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01464-CV JMA PARTNERS, INC. D/B/A GUARDIAN PHARMACY SERVICES AND JACK R. MUNN, Appellants V. JESUS GUZMAN, Appellee
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed April 16, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01464-CV JMA PARTNERS, INC. D/B/A GUARDIAN PHARMACY SERVICES AND JACK R. MUNN, Appellants V. JESUS GUZMAN, Appellee On Appeal from the
CURIPOMA, JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0159-22 Ex parte JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee ON PETITION FROM THE KINNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY AND ON COURT’S OWN MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY PER CURIAM. YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion. SLAUGHTER, J., filed a concurring
The State of Texas v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipomapublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REMAND NO. 03-22-00032-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, Appellee FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-22-000058, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING
The State of Texas v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipomapublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2024 NO. 03-22-00032-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH
CURIPOMA, JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0159-22 EX PARTE JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee ON PETITION FROM THE KINNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY AND ON THE COURT’S OWN MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY SLAUGHTER, J., filed a concurring opinion in which RICHARDSON,
CURIPOMA, JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0159-22 Ex parte JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee ON PETITION FROM THE KINNEY COUNTY ATTORNEY AND ON COURT’S OWN MOTION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS TRAVIS COUNTY KELLER, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion in which HERVEY and KEEL
CURIPOMA, JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ No. PD-0159-22 ══════════ EX PARTE JESUS ALBERTO GUZMAN CURIPOMA, Appellee ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition from the Kinney County Attorney And on the Court’s Own Motion for Discretionary Review From the Third Court of Appeals Travi
the State of Texas v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipomapublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 25, 2022 NO. 03-22-00032-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH DISMISSED FO
Guzman, Jose Jesuspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1863-04 <
the State of Texas v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipomapublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00032-CR The State of Texas, Appellant v. Jesus Alberto Guzman Curipoma, Appellee FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-22-000058, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION
Guzman, Jose Jesuspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-1863-04
Guzman v. Statepublic domain
OPINION COCHRAN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined. Jose Jesus Guzman put a loaded semiautomatic gun to his ex-girlfriend’s head and pulled the trigger. The gun fired. She was seriously injured. He was indicted for attempted murder. At trial, appellant, who was sixteen at th
Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / Suttonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 39708 LUIS JESUS GUZMAN, individually, ) ) Plaintiff-Defendant-Respondent, ) ) v. ) ) Boise, December 2013 Term DALE PIERCY, individually,
United States v. Guzmanpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge Bernardo Contreras Guzman (“Guzman”) and Jesus Morales (“Morales”) (collectively, “Defendants”) each filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) seeking a two-level reduction of their sentences based on United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) Amendment 782. The United States opposes these motions, arguing that nei